That’s foreskin moderators.
Will all the rhetoric and BS around here, it looks like we’re going to have to take things one at a time.
How do you explain away the fact that Abraham Lincoln, JFK - two assassinated US presidents - plus Andrew Jackson, who was the target of a failed assassination attempt - all ran afoul of international money handlers and that this fact very likely contributed to the actions taken against them??
Was this all a coincidence? Did some villain fabricate this situation as a tool to commit slander against bankers? Is it not written about in history books?
You know, it’s funny. I’ve been hearing for years about how everything is run by Zionists and/or Jews, but no one’s ever stopped at my house and said, “So, Malleus, who do you think we should conspire to ‘elect’ this year? BWAHAHA!” Have I been doing the wrong secret handshake or something?
EDIT: Also: detour, just clap your hands and say, “I do believe in elections! I do!” Then [del]Tinkerbell[/del] American democracy will come back to life. Clap your hands!
You forgot Derrick Mason. He’s the key to it all. Washed up wide receivers control the international bankers through subliminal messages encoded into their shoelaces.
I was unaware of this. Perhaps you could provide us with a clear and detailed outline of why you believe this to be so, along with credible citations that back up you assertion. I’d especially like to see evidence of the links between all of these assassinations that I’m sure must exist.
After reading your reply I’m sure we’ll all be better equipped to discuss the topic.
You realize that out of 44 presidents, 8 have had attempted assassinations, right?
Look, you guys. My landlord is Jewish. Maybe we should hear this guy out. There really is no telling how far up this goes… probably all the way :eek:
How did Lincoln do that? Or JFK?
Right. You’d have to first show that they did and were. Lincoln was the target of a group of southern sympathizers upset that the Confederacy lost who intended to throw the government into disarray by killing the President and his cabinet, Kennedy was the target of a mentally unstable Communist who was trying to get revenge for Kennedy’s participation in the Bay of Pigs, and Jackson was shot at by a paranoid schizophrenic who thought that he was an English king who had been dead for 350 years and that Jackson was a servant of his who had stolen his money. And as far as I know, none of them “ran afoul of international money handlers”.
Is it even possible to be president and not piss off an international money handler at some point? Seriously, you’re not going to be able to please all the international money handlers all the time, right?
Well, Jackson killed the Second Bank of the United States.
As I’ve pointed out before, this is part of why part of why there are problems with Walt and Mearsheimer’s ‘perfect storm’ of sloppy, myopic, monocausal pseudoscholarship, coupled with the dogwhistling about “conflicts of interest” (since dual loyalty is now recognized as a distasteful canard by most folks).
Our OP, who would otherwise just be an idiot racist babbling about how the Jews are out to get him, now has something that’s ostensibly scholarly to point to. True, even the fig leaf offered by The Israel Lobby Is Under Your Bed doesn’t rehabilitate the argument… but there are real dangers that such agenda-driven, shitty scholarship poses. Not the least of which is that people who are simply ignorant and/or stupid can be taken in by the Gish Gallop. One subject that does not need more ignorance-based, overly simplistic bullshit is the complicated question of the geopolitical implications, context, ramifications and causes which have been unfolding in the Middle East for roughly the last century.
To detour: you are cordially invited to jam at least one and potentially more (angry and, optionally, rabid) porcupines directly up your ass. The key is to really rile the porcupine(s) up first. I mean, really, go nuts. Porcupines fucking hate it when you jab them in the eyes with qtips covered in jalapeno juice. I suggest you start there and just see what works best.
Lincoln began printing the Greenback to finance the war. Although the Federal Reserve Act wasn’t passed in 1913, the Greenback was outside the system of debt-based currency at that time.
JFK printed the United States Note - also outside the (Federal Reserve) debt-based currency system. The Federal Reserve Note is what we use today. We pay a vast fortune in interest on this currency that is backed by nothing. The Federal Reserve, neither a federal agency nor a reserve, is a conglomeration of international banks which charge the people interest on the money that the US Treasury should be printing interest-free.
Andrew Jackson vetoed a congressional bill which would have extended the charter of the international bankers.
Is it only me who sees a relationship here?
Have you tried poking the porcupine(s) with hot embers?
The key, you see, is to really get 'em wriggling.
The porcupine(s), not the embers. That’d just be silly.
That’s what I love about school holidays: juvenile racist jackasses who’ve just discovered the magic of little letters appearing on a screen when they jabbed their fingers on a keyboard. Sadly, the juvenile racists sods haven’t figured out that just because words appear does not mean they appear to make sense. Case in poiint: Post #38 in this thread.
Friend of mine is Jewish and he was Mater Counselor of our DeMolay chapter. That means that, regardless of who it is controlling everything, the Masons or the Jews, he was on the right team. And I, non-Jew that I am, was there by his side. Guess that means I’d get at least some of the crust of that there pie.
That should be Master Counselor, not Mater Counselor, in post #76.
I also forgot to ask something of the OP: Are you proud of being as stupid as you are? I mean, you very well may not have any control over your lack of intelligence; however, your decision to display said lack isn’t exactly even a lobotomized person would make lightly.
Why is this Jewish Conspiracy only after American Presidents? Why not Chinese or Indians?
Obviously, you’re not Jewish enough.
Well, I know this one girl…