Males have environmental advantages that skew their representation at Harvard. The fact that these may be countered in part by affirmative action is irrelevant. If only two females applied to Harvard, that would not be evidence that males were discriminated against, it’d be powerful evidence to the contrary.
Hence the part of my post you’re still ignoring: whether discrimination in admissions is justified is a separate issue.
As an online discussion about a Democrat grows longer, the probability of a comparison to something completely irrelevant approaches 1.