I know there was a previous thread on this topic somewhere but this controversy has been brought back to the front pages with the recent debate.
Rather than rehash an older thread I’d like to get a fresh look.
The first words out of Browns mouth were:
[QUOTE=Scott Brown]
Professor Warren claimed that she was a Native American, a person of color, and as you can see, she’s not. When you are a U.S. senator, you have to pass a test and that’s one of character and honesty and truthfulness. I believe and others believe she’s failed that test.
[/QUOTE]
Western Massachusetts has a sizable native American population. I’ve met a number of people from mixed race backgrounds. Not everyone that can trace back their heritage to native Americans look native American.
I feel Scott Brown running his campaign on the bases of racism, claiming he knows better, just by looking at her, Warrens heritage.
Why is this acceptable in 2012? Is there some evidence Brown can present that shows Warren has no native American blood?
Is Browns Senate staff running around making war hoops going to attract a large enough racist base in Massachusetts to counter the votes of native Americans and those who find this presentation of racism abhorrent?