Hi Markxxx. I don’t mean to get snippy about your post, which was full of good and relevant comments, but I want to take issue with this one assertion. It’s become a pet peeve of mine over the years.
As I said earlier, I broke away from the 9-to-5 wage slave life, and started my own business. I’ve now been going for ten years. People ask me about this a lot, either because they’ve lost their job, or they hate the job they’ve got. I try to be as encouraging as I can, within reason. My general view is that being self-employed isn’t for everyone, but many, many more people should try it than ever actually do.
Anyway, this ‘95% fail within 12 months’ stat keeps coming up, and I do tend to get a bit annoyed by it. First of all, I don’t know where this figure comes from and I’ve never seen any cite to back it up. It seems to be just one of those urban memes that gets quoted everywhere. But, let’s suppose that it’s a perfectly valid stat. The point I want to make is that it’s not a useful statistic because it doesn’t discriminate. My version goes like this.
If you consider ill-advised business ventures, that people rushed into without due thought or preparation, without having saved up any capital, without any clear idea what they’re doing, with no realistic basis whatsoever for thinking it might work, and involving massive financial outlay up front… then sure, 95% of those ventures will fail within a year, and this shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.
If you consider smart people who decided to proceed cautiously, who started businesses that required very little money up front, and who had taken the time to think things through and to make sensible plans, about 80% of those businesses will survive beyond their first year, and even the ones that fail won’t have catastrophic consequences.
It’s no good just lumping them all together and saying ‘95% will fail’.