I report to a UK based organization. I really don’t need Putin’s man whore ironically misspelling words reported in the BBC. I am now being cyber-bullied by my boss and colleagues thanks to this walking orange embarrassment.
You may be glad to know that I have developed a defense: “In 4 years we get a chance to be rid of him. Brexit is forever, bitches!”
It doesn’t help that about 6 months ago I insisted that there was no way Trump could win the presidency. They like to remind me of that.
I hope the Brits will hurry up and do something stupid so that I can hide behind it.
Eichenwald is a lying, dishonest prick and in a more moral era would be an embarrassment to his publishers. Witness his ridiculous behavior on Tucker Carlson’s show when called on his claim that Trump was hospitalized in 1990 for a nervous breakdown. Time and time again when asked by Carlson to state yes or no as to whether Trump had indeed been so hospitalized, Eichenwald refused to answer by claiming Carlson wouldn’t allow him to answer it. Repeatedly Carlson then would say go ahead and answer, and Eichenwald’s response yet again would be to claim he wasn’t being allowed to answer. He was phony, dishonest and dissembling the whole way through.
Plus so far as I know there’s no reason for him to stay off Twitter. The strobe (whose posting I don’t agree with) was in the form of a GIF, which you have to click to get it to animate. It’s not like simply opening the site is going to suddenly inundate you with flashing strobe lights. Perhaps if he weren’t such a lying, obfuscating and obnoxious twit he wouldn’t inspire people to do things like that to him.
Somebody tried to do that to me they’d be in for a serious asskicking. I’d make sure that person would regret it.
(Mind you, flashing lights don’t bother me – I don’t have photosensitive epilepsy. I’d still be seriously fucking pissed)
Good thing I haven’t advocated such a sentiment then, huh?
I clearly stated that I didn’t agree with the posting of the strobe light. But actions have consequences, and whether a person deserves the results he gets from his actions or not, he certainly bears responsibility for them. It’s like the old saw about how a person deserves to be able to walk down a dark alley in expensive clothes and jewelry with money hanging out of his pockets and not be disturbed, but the reality is that anyone stupid and foolish enough to do so is very likely to get results he would have avoided if he’d behaved in a more intelligent fashion.
You know, it’s okay to say “Eichenwald’s an ass, but being an ass doesn’t make one deserve epileptic assaults (or death threats, or rape threats, or whatever), and those such should be condemned” or similar. You don’t have to defend the actions of every conservative asshole. Certain things are beyond the pale, and not the fault of the victim.
This is the second time this has happened to Eichenwald. The first time was back in September in repsonse to this article in Newsweek entitled “How The Trump Organization’s Foreign Business Ties Could Upend National Security”. That attack did not trigger a seizure.
Perhaps conservatives could tell me what in this article that is lying and obfuscating and an embarassment to his publishers and would justify not only a physical assault but also threats against his children. And while they are at it, could they also tell me how “actions have consequences” also applies to the threats and harassment received by the following from Trump supporters: Katy Tur, Charles Blow, Jeffrey Goldberg, Julia Ioffe, Megyn Kelly, Bethany Mandel, Erik Erikson, Jonathan Weisman, Sopan Deb, Chuck Jones, Dana Schwartz, and Michelle Fields (among others)?