Evolution....

[Ecmandu]

You could actually stop terrorism with this if you sent it out… not that terrorism is the largest problem here, I’m just saying…

Arranged marriages have been a bad idea and set a horrible example, primarily because people can end up with either abusive partners or partners with different sexual orientations.

Another thing to note is that men who notice that women show negative body language around sexual approach relative to men, and refuse to approach women because of this, can act out subconsciously to being approached by a woman because he is afraid of both showing attraction, which would be a form of flirting, and he’s afraid of sexual rejection (not being approached) for holding this space for both men and women, understanding the larger implications of their sexual rejection.

The intuition and sensitivity of a person can be gauged by who they are sexually drawn towards, and women tend to be less capable of the very thing they are claimed to have the most of, which is this intuition about sexual politics and why people do what they do and what their energy is like. This has been my personal observation of the situation.

When i said that i was the first person to actually deserve their sex in this species, it’s more about the magnitude and scope of my understanding, my discipline, and my ability to spread information, that if taken as reasonable advice, can actually solve a lot of conflict.

Unfortunately, this can be misconstrued by many as wanting to force myself upon people.

One of the tragic aspects of females being drawn towards aggressive sexual politics, is that the men who don’t act out, absorb a lot of suffering, so men will be motivated to act out to not feel so bad… I don’t actually care how bad I feel when it comes to this topic.

There is one more thing i want to clear up about these people who save sex for marriage (even though marriage itself is severely and extremely unethical), not everyone fits everyone. This lack of education is astounding… and I send this personal information to make the point…

My size is and 5 and 7/8th’s inches with average girth for that size… this is under the 20th percentile of penis size and not considered big at all by people who tend to consider these things. I have hit on women before, and one of them, with this size penis, I could not enter into. These abstinence junkies until marriage are idiots, people need real sex education, not stupid religious bullshit. I know it can seem like a strange thing to comment on your penis size, but it brings home a larger point, which is that these people contradict themselves when presented with the real fucking world. I actually took it upon myself to use meditation to hell all of my sexual memories as ill gotten gains, and I’ve probably had sex 15 times in my whole life between a few parters. You wouldn’t want a psychopath sitting there with euphoric recall about all their rapes and murders would you?

I entrust these e-mails to you to distribute well. I have a lot of enemies in this world and I’m trying to educate people on how to improve it. People so much want power instead of knowledge, they are corrupt, and I don’t think all of this goes to some heaven for these folks, I’ve had enough experience psychically to understand that there is a spiritual world of incredible magnitude. The atheist that believes there is nothing after death, cannot make a moral argument, because in this world, psychopaths enjoy their lives better than non-psychopaths, and most atheists are psychopaths by my reckoning. It’s not to say that there is a creator, I think it’s something even greater than these two ideas…

You can send me any religious text on earth and I’ll refute it. What’s important about this, is that cultures need to apologize for their religious texts, not defend them and not ignore the impact they’ve had on making the world a worse place to be in.

People are so glib about this stuff… the problem is, I’m not the only one they have to face down in judgement of themselves and all of us. The clues were there the whole time, and people plead, “But the creator made us this way.”, you were given freewill and moral judgement, and you sold out for sexual rivalry and shutting up about it too. There are a lot of people who have had tremendous integrity here that you’ll have to stand up to in some idea of cosmic court, people think they’re saved and free… There are some lines you don’t cross, and most people have crossed them without any remorse whatsoever. When reason comes to bear upon this earth, people will be astounded… the Bible says that the advocate cannot defend against God, that God has no moral foundation, and is wonton absolute power… there are many things God cannot do, or cannot do without severe consequence to god and/or everyone.

This is for those who believe such things. As I said earlier, I believe what’s occurring here is beyond atheism and God duality. Creator duality.

I know it sounds strange, but I needed to explain this.

The reason sexual neglect has such severe consequences is because neglect is the worst form of abuse, we all know 40 minutes in a deprivation talk can screw someone up way more than several tours of war. So when we’re talking about crimes of neglect, we’re in serious territory. Neglect of good behavior is the worst, because it causes just suffering, and when people talk the way they do about sexuality in the context of what’s really occurring in the real world, they just sound like a bunch of arrogant assholes, men and women.

The lack of sensitivity to this subject is appalling. This is not a matter of moral subjectivity when dealing with suicide rates which are the primary indicator of species health. The problem is the female denial system and how it’s sexual blackmail system works, even though men know this stuff is true, they’ll either shut up about it or become glib about what a reject someone is to even try to discuss this (they do it to get sex).

I actually walked around my city a couple years ago and just started asking men and women these questions “Do you think jerks or nice guys get more women?” or “Do you think jerks or nice girls get more men?”

The guys answered jerks for men and nice girls for women, about 300 of them… EXCEPT when a woman was next to them. When I asked women these questions they had one of two answers, “Why are you asking this?” and “That is totally inappropriate!”

Women know it’s true, they just don’t suffer the consequences of it, at least insomuch as they can’t abstract their own oppression from it, so they just avoid it, and start accusing the men of stalking them or trying to force sex on them. I have a very calm demeanor, and am not on the autism spectrum and know body language very well, the female response is simply inappropriate given the context unless there was another variable, sociopathy. Men are very candid about this topic until there’s a woman present.

Men often wonder why you shouldn’t be a psychopath, and often male psychopaths hate women, and I tell them quite candidly, don’t be like the women you hate, because they are psychopaths… if you really do hate them, be a good man.

I don’t think the women are just going to get away with this, not when we’re dealing with suffering of this magnitude for the kindest most astute males.

The thing about hell, that I like to tell people, is that the external “damnations” aren’t as bad as the internal ones, so just leave them alone… I think there will be a reckoning someday. As far as this planet is concerned, I wiped my hands of all of it… I may have to send everyone here to hell and just move to a new planet.

And I can do it by simply being kind. The problem with the “kill them with kindness” phrase, and women love this phrase for some reason, is that women being kindest to the assholes, is killing all the nice guys through suicide, against their own game theory of what works best for the species… so I suppose it’s who you are killing with kindness that counts.

The reason it’s so easy for my trial on war, is because there is no side that is fighting a just war, you can prove it with the wedding rungs and the sexual stratification and the hitting on women… flirting with them, these are EXTREMELY severe crimes against humanity… that women don’t reject these men is EXTREMELY severe. The blood is being spilled for nothing, just to get laid as assholes.

[Ecmandu]

Don’t get me wrong… if I saw someone trying to rape a woman and they attacked me, I’d fight them, and if they were trying to use lethal force so they could continue raping the woman, I’d be lucky to subdue, or if I couldn’t kill them.

I’m not a pacifist… I don’t just stand around when people are being abused.

But you have to understand, you can’t fight wars for no good reason… and getting sex from female psychopaths is not a good reason.

Obviously it’d be nice if we could all just get along, but I’ve pointed out some issues with this…

Now, to get people to look even deeper inside… if men are the ones causing all the war by simply going to it… you can actually blame female psychology for war.

How? People partner up… just like sexual stratification causes suicide, women have always had the ability to kill partners in their sleep if they spoke of going to war.

This could have been conquered in one generation with the female sexual blackmail system being inverted. Then you’d just be left with peaceful people, innovating in more peaceful ways… probably having cured more illness and other types of innovations with respect to energy and the like.

This is a fact.

So the question is… what do we do now?

I’ve tried to talk with lots of psychopaths in my life, very serious ones (I’m a telepath and a spirit talker), and their hatred of women makes them hate themselves for being psychopaths, once they realize how psychopathic women are. I try to explain to them… don’t be like the women… and suddenly it dawns on them why they were wrong to be that way, women are SO EVIL that all I have to say to someone like Ted Bundy to convert them, is don’t be like the women, and suddenly they cry and make vows not to harm.

Women are much more complicated and have a much deeper denial system than even male psychopaths… especially the broad category of sexual psychopathy that women exhibit as a gender, that keeps causing male suicide.

The biggest problem with religion is that it didn’t condemn rape in ancient times.

Many religions state the golden rule, however…

It is important to understand from a psychological and subliminal perspective why people act out… often it’s because of the golden rule, as in the case of someone breaking and entering because of offering sex, from their perspective, as long as the person would leave, they would happily have (mostly men) women just walk into their place to offer sex… the problem here is that men and women are different, and the golden rule doesn’t apply to differences like these. From the female perspective, this is acting out… and thus it is from the male perspective as well. But the subliminal mind can become confused by things like this. Flashing people follows a similar principle (mostly male offenders).

Stalking is often caused by someone trying to prevent a sexual crime or emotional crime, they believe they deserve the partner more or at least a little bit, and will consider it an act of justice to prevent this sexual crime from occurring, an extremely severe crime I might add… but the problem is that when you act out, you no longer deserve the sex or necessarily even the emotional intimacy the person believes they deserve.

These crimes weigh heavily on the male side because of many female signals and the way women distribute sex, but is not isolated only to men acting out against women.

The biggest mistake I think religion made was not to state that sexual stratification and the asshole problem causes increased agitation, stress and depression. Sexual stratification is the phenomenon on the male side where women basically only give 1% of men 80% of their sexual variety. This is why the difference in suicide rates every year between men and women is 20,000 women to 1,000,000 men. In fact, so many men commit suicide that it exceeds ALL deaths from war, homicide and female suicide combined. Those numbers may seem skewed if you do a bit of research, however suicidologists don’t measure the fact that most completed female suicides are actually failed suicide attempts to make it look good. It’s a very involved discussion.

The asshole problem is simply approaching a woman in any way and marriage and monoamory, aside from being a bullish person.

The problem with SYMBOLS of fidelity is that it’s not true. Symbols of fidelity can be sarcastic, they can be lies, they can be a lack of understanding, etc… I don’t like the term marriage because it’s more about weddings and such, rings and such, than the concept of fidelity to principles, which as we discover them actually work, or don’t contradict motives through debate. What’s actually important is that fidelity comes from the mind and the heart, not from external symbols, like flashing peace signs and such, and people who understand this simple truth, for the sheer sake of honesty about life process, refuse to use these symbols, the same can be said of ceremonies like baptisms and such.

The most peaceful species on earth is the Bonobo, which has very progressive sexual politics and no war or homicide… their cousins the chimpanzee across the river have sexuality more like human sexuality and they have homicide and war.

You would think if there was a good religion, it would have pointed out these things that everyone knows… men have been telling women since the beginning of speech that assholes get the most sex, but there is a female sexual, emotional and social blackmail system when it comes to pointing this out, so the men learn to shut up about it to get sex.

This is a very detailed topic and I just scratched the surface, but it suggests that this species was not divinely inspired to have rules that work… in fact most the rules given in religious texts actually make things worse.

If there is a creator… this is the best song a human being can sing to it in my opinion, it sums up the human plight perfectly with respect to this urge or idea…

“How Can I Be Sure” by the Young Rascals — youtube it.

Religion talks a lot about “family values”, and sexual politics tends to group us into families that actually divide community itself, and children are BEST raised by communities and not families.

Religion also has a tendency to make the loudest noises in a city by putting bells on churches, which is probably against the constitutional idea of separation of church and state… if they were placed in community centers or city squares, people would be more community oriented psychologically, and not be getting noise pollution from highly divisive ideologies that destroy community in the big picture.

I used to be a Montessori teacher, and I learned something very valuable from this, The girls never played with legos and the men always did, but the men would constantly play with the kitchenette and the dolls with women… what I learned from this is that men are more psychologically flexible than women are, they meet women more than women meet men, which is why the male suicide rate is so high.

I have been blacklisted from just about everything sigh

My biggest problem with Hollywood or the press in general is that they are propaganda systems… the Big bang Theory is supposedly a show about nice guys who can’t get laid, but they are all assholes!!!

One aspect of female sexuality is that they have rape fantasies at a rate of 64%. Heterosexual males don’t have these fantasies. It’s important to understand that heterosexual sexuality has the greatest impact on species dynamics since they are 95% of the population, actually the oppression of the LGTBA (asexual) community and their corresponding suicide rates occur not because of their sexuality, but because of the unjust oppression of minority groups that is part of the male mating ritual to draw in the most females.

Anyways, of this 64%, 45% have what are called “highly erotic” rape fantasies, 46% have erotic and averse rape fantasies and 9% have averse rape fantasies.

The nature of highly erotic rape fantasies was found not to be a simulation to prepare them for potential rape and their response, but rather, they used very ugly men who attacked them against their will and found it extremely pleasurable. The reason? Their sexual POWER was so great that a man could not help himself from crossing that line, and it gave them a great sense of POWER. This means that 30% of women have highly erotic rape fantasies, which comes out in their affect and body language and vocal tone and their behavior through subliminal messages, which is why rapists often think that rape is what when want when they are doing it to them. Even if one woman wants to be raped in this species, they can go to hell, because they are ruining it for every other woman in this species.

The subliminal doesn’t excuse the behavioral, and the moment a man crosses this line, he no longer deserves the sex.

The problem is that women draw in aggression. One way that women do this is that they become more angry at men for not being sexually jealous if the woman cheats on him, than if he cheats on her… she will be more likely to leave him for being polysexual, this causes men to get the sexual adaptation of being sexually possessive and jealous (it increases aggression) in order to secure a female sexual partner. Women look for these subtle clues to decide whether they will have sex with a man or not.

As I said earlier, the only way a man CAN get sex with a woman, is if he sells out.

But I will say something additionally… I believe in hell (I’ve been there) and an afterlife. I believe our consciousness signatures can be retrieved.

As a follow up, it felt really important to explain this part of human sexuality.

Because so few men receive such great sexual variety from women and women basically get all the sexual variety that they want from those few men, it causes men to be more “piggish” or “doggish”, and is a form of acting out, and these men don’t deserve the sex… however, it is what works best.

The basic subliminal message that women throw out to the world is that they want sexually what they complain about. Men do not send this subliminal message. But the subliminal doesn’t excuse the behavioral. Once a male has trained himself not to throw out psychology, symbols or body language, tone etc… that make the species worse, women will not have sex with them.

It is a blackmail system. Which is why men get so stressed out relative to women. It actually increases ones positive outlook on life to get as many sexual partners as you want, which is why the female suicide rate is so low compared to the male suicide rate.

Men have been complaining about this since before they could even speak, with their body language. There actually isn’t a game theory that defends female sexuality, I’ve heard them all from looking for aggression to secure their young etc… It actually decreases their security. I’ve heard women are considered a more valuable gender because they are the ones who get pregnant, and that’s why men protect them from going to war, for example… actually, if this species had 3.5 billion men and one fertile women, the entire species could reproduce.

The reason women are seen as more valuable is because they stratify their sex (and men as less valuable because women get the sex they generally want), which makes them more valuable because men want to have sex with them, it’s also why you have the industry of female alluridness, a market for prostitution so heavily on the female side and other variables, such as all those phone sex commercials on TV showing women and not men. It creates a resource to stratify sex.

Women get very angry when women try to reduce the value of this resource by sleeping with lots of men. In fact, the outlawing of nudity itself, well at this point involves several factors, but is basically, to protect female nudity as a commodity. Because men have become so deranged by female sexual distribution, it could also make them more likely to touch women inappropriately… so that’s another issue as well, although there are many celebrations of nudity where people act appropriately.

Female body language suggests that they don’t like to be sexually approached, definitely relative to men, this even includes flirting… the very astute “nice guy” decides that he will never hit on a woman or make any of the first moves, he holds open a space for women to approach what they don’t complain about and holds open the space for men to be approached. The more astute ones talk about the asshole problem and sexual stratification, to try to prevent the suicide rates in the world, war, environmental degradation (conspicuous consumption aggression), poverty (conspicuous consumption aggression) and things like sports, mass media and music which are propaganda systems for the female denial system.

The female tendency to distribute their sex highly when they are young and then tending to settle into monosexual pairings is actually affecting the stratification problem. Another one of the reasons the female suicide rate is lower is because men sleep around more throughout their lives, they don’t horde their sexuality when they make good connections with people.

[njtt]

Um, right, gotta go…

[Ecmandu]

Personal history…

I saw this before I hit puberty, the “asshole problem” where women are drawn to men who send the subliminal message that women want what they sexually complain about. But the first time it really hit me was when I became sexual through puberty… I was 11 years old and there was a girl I was interested in who gave a blowjob to a man who was a much greater “acter out” than I was or most people were… to make a long story short, by the time I reached high school, I understood the full magnitude of this problem that kept recurring, and I stopped doing homework because I knew all the books were lies about the female sexual blackmail system and it’s effect on global politics. If you accept the female sexual blackmail system and shut up about sexual stratification and the asshole problem (including jocks and most musicians), then you can end up having a pretty good life.

Those are the men who sell out. I ended up dropping out of high school with a panic disorder that lasted for ten years… let me put this to you so you can understand it. People who’ve had panic attacks can understand this…I had a 24/7 panic attack for 10 years… that’s WAY worse than a concentration camp, and that was the EASY part of my life.

People think they can judge me. I have have something else to add. I did act out just a little in my life to get women… I actually hit on them. I am attractive and charismatic… and I ended up using meditation to hell all of my memories to repent for receiving ill gotten gains… (and sending these essays out as a form of making amends, technically I have both atoned and repented.) which is having sex with a woman before you explain the sexual stratification and asshole problem without approaching them with it.

When I say that I am the only person ever born on this planet who actually deserved their sex… I’m not kidding. This is the only way you can approach a woman in this context and not cause war, suicide, and poverty.

I don’t have to wear the blood of the humans. I believe there are so many women in this cosmos, that when I send all of them to hell, I won’t even bother to look back. The women on this earth are in hell, if they join me, they can get out of it… but I highly doubt that they will, so I’ll take some men with me… hell all of your sexual encounters men with meditation, and you’ll realize that there is something higher than this shit plane with psychopathic women. Don’t hit on them, don’t attack them, don’t act out to get sex. Don’t ever make the first move on anything. They will fall on their own swords… there are more women in this cosmos than you can possibly comprehend… don’t fall for the human ones, they are psychopaths.

You know, one thing women could have been oriented towards, and this is really important, since there is diversity, is that whenever a man talked about going to war… and after sexual stratification occurs women do settle down with just about every man… they could have killed them in their sleep with a fricking piece of obsidian 40,000 years ago… and the female sexual blackmail system would be inverted, and NO MAN WOULD EVER WAR AGAIN. In fact… all war would stop today if women did this. That reduces the cycle of suffering, all those men would know why they were in hell, and this species would advance technologically and energetically beyond the scope that it is today. Of course, with the sexual stratification still in play, there would still be mass male suicides, which as i said before is suffering as bad if not worse than a concentration camp if you refuse to accept the female sexual, emotional and social blackmail system. This is actually genocide being done by women. 1 million deaths per year.

Like i said, I don’t have to wear the blood of the humans at all. I can hell this entire planet and never look back, including my incredibly sweet mother… it’s a REALLY big fucking cosmos. I needed to say that.

I was talking about this topic with someone and they quipped, “That’d be a pretty interesting religion… instead of someone dying on a cross to save us all, everyone gets crossed because one person was right.” I’m not sure what to make of any of that anyways, I’m here, this is what I know, and that’s all I know… I can only explain what I know.

To follow up on what i said about if Christ was living truth, then his virgin birth could have been replicated millions of times by nuns… and we’d have millions of Christ’s, male and female, all over the world teaching us great wisdom and healing us… it’s more community oriented and not so dramatic as “THE GREAT KING OF ALL”.

It’s important for people to understand that these books are very easy to refute.

Men… sign your peace contracts… seriously. Don’t believe the shit about Jeruselem being destroyed and the end of the world or any of that shit… these people are going to hell… I’m talking about people’s obsession with the book of revelations. Keep the city just as it is, let them live high… don’t attack each other, settle these disputes… this shit is going to gurt them more than you can possibly imagine… they need to atone for the Bible, and the Torah and all the extra-biblical commentary… I would NEVER want that hell… and don’t be stupid enough to join them in it. Islamists… I can destroy your holy books without even blinking or sweating, understand this… nature talks much louder than these books ever can.

Men act out to get sex, stop acting out to get sex, stop warring for it, just stop.

The women are seriously messed up and you’re just reacting to it… STOP reacting to it!!! If they change their ways they’ll be redeemed, but I can tell you for sure that acting out just to get sex will send you down with them. And let’s be perfectly clear here… that’s the ONLY reason you are acting out in this world.

It’s not for property, it’s not for money, it’s not for food… these things are plenty… all of these problems of wealth distribution and war come from what women want, do not “fall” for the women.

Marriage is about marking territory, and women like to be marked as sexual territory, and this makes men happy because they can secure a sexual resource, you shouldn’t mark people as your sexual territory… now to explain this deeper, if women had sex with nicer men all the time this species would be much more peaceful for both men and women… actually marrying a woman is a way of acting out to get sex. And I need to explain again, that the only reason people war is because women like to have sex with assholes. It’s why people stone people to death, it’s why vaginas are mutilated ALL OF IT!!! Understand this very clearly… this shit is not going to end well for any of these people.

You can end the terrorists with these e-mails. I can actually refute any religious text on earth, knowing that sexual stratification causes increased stress, depression, agitation and apathy is the best teaching the world could have ever received… “spit” on those stupid books about religion… because NONE of them said that.

I need to repeat. The ONLY reason men go to war is because they want to get laid.

It’s not even about reproduction, and there are some sexual selection theorists who understand exactly what I’m saying and know it’s true, we live in a species where emotional intimacy with sexuality for a species that has desirable orgasms and is social needs to distribute their sex better to make the world better.

It’s not even a theory, this is a fact about our world… and a psychologist can understand that people act out from the subliminal… however acting out from the subliminal doesn’t excuse the behavioral, because not everyone acts out from the subliminal.

Female killers are generally sexually shunned by men… this causes a behavioral situation where women are less likely to do this, if they do do this, it tends to be the evolutionary urge for money… social stratification is caused by the females having the most sex with the wealthy in money.

I need to explain something about money. It is not the root of all evil. It is a useful abstraction for when you cannot trade something someone else doesn’t want for what you want… it actually helps solve this problem. The problem with money is female sexuality, and males acting out to suppress females wages to get sex from women, because women send the subliminal message that they want sexually what they complain about. Different people handle money more responsibly than others do, so social stratification is always going to be an issue as long as this is true… and it is just in this instance. One of the bizarre propaganda statements is that prostitution is the oldest profession in the world… that’s not true… picking berries is the oldest profession in the world, but people are fucking morons and they think they are so fucking profound.

Some people also deserve more resources than others because of their contributions. Some shithead asshole deserves no sex, some really kind male who has excellent game theory and is extremely wise deserves LOTS of sex, consensual sex… everyone deserves consensual sex who has earned it, rape and sexual assault is unacceptable.

I go after Christianity because it’s the most common religion. I need to make some statements about this. A Virgin Birth sets an extremely bad example for the world.

If this were true, then that means any chaste nun who took these biblical vows seriously would be given virgin births to send a message to our species that this was truth incarnate.

It’s very important to understand, that if everyone stopped having sex, this species would be dead in 100 years… it’s the most anti-life message you can send to the world, being born as a king from a virgin on a planet like this. Even taking a vow of celibacy or chastity is extremely anti-life on this plane of existence… someone may transcend human sexuality on other planes, but they can always send out with their hearts sexuality that reduces aggression, and this is extremely important to understand. The Buddha was wrong to take a vow of celibacy on an earthly plane of existence. He fucking ate food. sigh Perhaps you can understand this.

Marriage is also about marking sexual territory, which women enjoy being marked as sexual territory and men are happy to oblige. This is one of the ways assholes get sex from women. Like i said before, a man MUST act out to get sex from a female in this species… so men so act out. Actually all war in the world is caused by sexual stratification and the asshole problem… it divides community and makes the world worse for everyone.

This is also why nice men go through suffering worse than a concentration camp, because they abstract the suffering of the entire cosmos from their sexual rejection.

These are actual intuitives, not the propaganda intuitives that women claim to be.

This suffering causes those million suicides every year… which is actually, genocide. Women are committing a genocide worse than a concentration camp with more deaths every year than all the deaths from war, homicide and female suicide combined. That’s a VERY serious crime!!!

The only reason I spend the most time talking about Christianity is because it is the worlds largest religion.

People need to get over this stuff and themselves.

War is caused because women want assholes… that’s the whole story of this species. The ENTIRE story of this species.

Let me explain something very simply… I don’t defend the soldiers of this country, because they are also assholes trying to get laid. I live in the US. It’s always been the case that words and psychology works better than guns and ammo if you can get the messages out. A man would have to be a complete moron to not know that they are subconsciously warring to get sex… and as long as there’s sexual stratification and as long as that stratification tips towards the assholes… all women are on trial for simply being a woman on this earth, every fucking one of them, or rather, they have a reckoning.

Sorry this was so intense.

One possibility is that some ET species that has evolved or at least grown for trillions of years could be handling all of this for us… not some species that experiments on us, they would be so wise that there’d be no point… it could even handle life after death for us.

The idea is that the cosmos in my mind is much more flexible than the consolidation of power, the God concept.

I am the least psychopathic person I know that’s ever been born on this earth, and I am also the best psychologist I know that’s ever been born on this earth…

I am not representing through the papers I sent you, my capacity to reach people where they are… Everyone is different, and from my perspective, everyone is really, really sick in the head. You simply cannot argue with the person who figured out that suicide and war is caused from female sexuality, when nobody said it before. I know many serial killers and homicidal people through the form of telepathy I have, and I have to explain, that if I could talk to everyone on this earth, one by one, I could settle them down, but I don’t have that option, these e-mails are a fraction of my wisdom.

Basically, everyone is reacting to female sexuality who acts out. That is the sum total of all wisdom for this species. I have something else to add… don’t act out because of it. I would take a bullet in the head for not defending our soldiers, or any soldier who has ever lived, and they will have to go through my hell times ten if they do it… I have no fear here.

Stop your wars because of the women, and when it hurts because they give the assholes the most sex… or don’t distribute their sex equitably don’t pity them, it’s a VERY big fucking cosmos.

Many religions have the idea of idolatry. One of the ironies of the Judaic tradition is that Satan was cast down for not bowing to Adam. The irony of this is that it contradicts their own theology. Bowing is an act of idolatry, Satan knows that God knows what’s in Satan’s heart, so actually the act of bowing is not acknowledging this basic fact of their very own religion… that God knows all things.

What’s interesting is that an atheist can figure out the exact same thing the religions figure out, except the atheist can figure out that symbols are illusions to what they know about themselves… they are used to try to control a world that looks like it’s completely random, and out of fear, they wear symbols to represent this control.

Peace is someone not attacking you… that speaks much louder than a peace symbol.

This is a very deep truth about our reality that can be discovered by anyone.

I know this is discussed in Islam, but the full details of shirk can even be understood as marriage itself… it is an illusion, a fear to try to control through symbolism, it is a lack of faith, it is the fear that we cannot always know what’s in someone’s heart, so we try to use symbols to control this fear, or to try to control them, but it is an illusion, we don’t have this kind of control… what matters from this perspective of an all seeing Allah is that Allah already knows your heart, so the symbols don’t matter, in fact, it’s a way of showing that you don’t even believe Allah knows all of this… it is the same concept in Judaism as idolatry.

Now I try to plead with men not to abuse men or women because of their subliminal minds… women like aggressive men, or they send mixed signals, and this causes men to act out aggressively… do not lose your composure because of how women act sexually… the problem with female sexual distribution is global, and every man has to decide whether he’s going to be violent to get sex or whether he’s going to stop acting out because of how women are.

I hope that made sense.

The main point here if you really look at the facts of our social species, is that we don’t war for territory or resources or our children (reproductive sex), or… if we do, it’s because of women, because we are exhaserbating, umm… intensifying our acting out to get sex… “acting out” is treating them poorly or treating others poorly. We do it to secure a sexual resource, either thinking that because we act out, the next life will give us women, or for all the women we get in this life… this is nonsense. When you abuse a woman, you will go to hell, when you act against the conscience of nice men, you will go to hell, and this hell will not be filled with women to have sex with, it probably won’t have a single person at all. STOP being stupid men, there is much more than the women of this species. Treat them with respect, no matter how much it hurts… they will fall on their own swords. Everyday I don’t get sex from a woman, that woman is sent to hell… the abuse is so severe that it will absorb the entire suffering of this species.

You are not supposed to take vows of celibacy and chastity on an earthly plane… it actually makes the abuse worse, because you are removing yourself from the sexual reward system, which you will eventually transcend to some degree… but it is important to understand, the only reason people do this, and they are cowards, is because in an animal species, when you take this vow, you are not seen as a sexual rival, and people are more likely to trust you and less likely to attack you… don’t attack these morons and hypocrites, they will have a reckoning as well. Also!!! Respect sexual orientations!!!

People will plead and plead and plead, and I will show them the whole world, and they will cry and cry and cry.

I need to explain something to the human species… the women are causing 1 million suicides every year in conditions often worse than concentration camps.

I know all about the female suicides and homicides and why they commit them…

When you stand in judgement before my life story, it will all become very apparent what is occurring here.

I have one thing to say to the men and women… men have been saying, since before they could even form words, that the assholes get them most sex, and you spat on them… men have even noticed sexual stratification, and you spat upon them.

So they started to act out to get a sexual resource. These men are judged severely. Men who rape women, or even act out to get them are helled. NEVER act out because of the women men… pay them equal wages, speak kindly to them and never flirt with them. There are men who think they love the women here… I have seen and heard it all, and let me explain to you, these women and men are in hell. But he moment you cross that line, you join it with them… and when you get there, there aren’t going to be any women for you. Hell is not paradise. STOP warring for the women. The women are already in hell. Don’t join them. I doesn’t matter what suffering befalls you here because earthly spirits won’t protect you because of the female sexual blackmail system. They are already in hell. Just be the nicest person you can be men. This is not what it seems… the monks and nuns are all in hell. They are not being raped, they are not being assaulted, they are in a hell even worse than that.

[Ecmandu]

I’m trying to deliver you from this plane, everything men do that is violent or acting out, even with speech, is to get women to have sex with them. STOP DOING IT!!!

You will never regret it.

Being the first person who’s actually earned the right to have sex on this earth, and saying that women should come up to me constantly, I actually don’t care about the sex, I care about the hearts… they will be in hell for walking past me and not approaching me, and when I explain this to them and they still refuse to have sex with me, the hell gets MUCH worse… this is like spitting in the Buddha’s face when she teaches the dharma to you.

The reason I’m a man is because the women rule the world, and the men are the oppressed ones. Anyone who cannot see this, is blind.

Just being a “cocky” person is one of the ways that men flirt with women, flirting is an extremely large category of behavior. Talking about sexuality in crass ways is another form of flirtation. As I said earlier, women are most statistically likely to have sex with what they complain most about, and the more a man trains himself to not act out, the statistical odds finally reach zero.

I understand the issues are complex because of the nuclear age in terms of the balances on earth, we still have a cold war here so long as we still have these weapons, and the magnitude of these weapons gives us excuses to not sign peaceful contracts, to have a military presence in the world… even when people sign peace treaties, with all of our guns and weapons, we will be in a cold war for a very long time before we give them up.

It’s just exceedingly important that men realize that they are acting out to get sex, and that this behavior is inexcusable. If they don’t believe this, they are still asleep in their subliminal minds, they have become the thing they hate… even if they see love all around them, the reckoning of that genocide of those 1 million men every year who suicide will give them intense self-hatred. They will realize that they weren’t really defending anything and the love was an illusion cast by females liking aggressive men.

Realistically, and people will think this sounds insane, we need to keep track of our sexual distributions, we need equal sexual stratification… and until women show as much comfort and joy for being approached as men do, women should always be the ones who approach men first. It wouldn’t hurt to have merit systems, and use our communities to make these judgements.

These problems are solvable if people will sit down and have serious discussions about it.

Relics and temples are also idolatry from a religious view, this is where atheists are smarter than the religious people, they don’t build grand temples to atheism, they build little buildings where they can meet and discuss ideas in open dialogue, not with some preacher doing all the talking and everyone just shutting up, without asking questions on the spot.

Basically, the religions cannot even get their most sacred doctrines right, if there is some great powerful omniscient creator… it doesn’t want a temple, it doesn’t want people to stake land as more sacred than other land, it already knows your heart, to use these symbols betrays your faith in this, and the creator knows this.

The atheist can easily grasp this concept who is pure, they realize that they know who they are… and that symbols and temples don’t change that… they don’t believe in some great over-seer other than the fact that they know themselves, and that not betraying this with symbols and temples lacks integrity.

Oddly enough, in many ways, the atheist understands and abides by religion better than the religious themselves.

To understand how silly temples and holy spots are… pray to a single leaf on a single tree and understand that this is your temple for the day, then, pray to the trail you are walking on, then pray to your clothing, then pray to your body… all of this is temple… I think more important than prayer is mental focus and earnestness, meditation… imagining a better world and doing what you must to make it that way, trying to understand the world and how we can use its lessons to better our situation here.

It is important to understand that everyone is different, there is no right way to eat or drink… everyone has different tastes, allergies and biochemistries… some people abuse substances and some people need to use them because they lack something. Some people die when they don’t eat meat, they become hyper-alkalynic because of their biochemistry. Don’t be too judgmental about these things, or too rigid.

When we have facts, we can bear down with judgement, when it is the opposite of a fact, we can bear down with judgement… if someone tells someone who needs alcohol to help them through life that they shouldn’t drink, we should judge them for it, they are projecting their problem with alcohol onto another and not tolerating the diversity of life here. When someone contradicts themselves, we can judge this, for they are hypocrites. To say not to judge is a sneaky way to try not be judged or to make everyone like you in a world where many people need to be told that they are wrong. Even tobacco can help certain people… it is a medicine that has side effects… it can feel abusive to some and not others. People need to understand their equilibriums and not try to make sweeping moral judgements about stuff that doesn’t cause homicide, suicide or rape.

I can’t do anything about the need to use force when people are being abusive… like I said, I don’t have to wear this blood… but it is important that people learn from my mistakes and the lessons I’ve learned here… anyone why fights a holy war can see through these essays and notes that I just sent you that they are hypocrites to themselves… and once they finally learn that they are just warring for just a sexual resource and not even a reproductive resource from women, I hope they can reach agreements about not reacting to them…

I watched a movie called “awake” last night… and all I could think of, besides factual problems with it, was… this movie should be called “Ignore the nice guy problem”… all those suicides, coming from female sexual distribution and also all the male acting out. It’s interesting to hear men saying things women want to hear in this movie, and women saying things that avoid the issue… It’s like this big “Go into a trance and forget this issue…”

I’m not sure who’s going down for all of this… but I really think people need to get together and explain why we even bother to fight and stratify our resources as badly as we do. It’s because men are trying to get laid. And even if a man lives an upright life… simply avoiding this discussion is acting out to get sex, he’s not actually trying to stop the war or hunger.

It’s very important to understand that. Even an atheist can understand everything I’ve told you, just as a matter of self interest…

What’s interesting about my interviews with women, my questions that i asked them about jerks and nice men and women… is that unlike the men, the women know it’s true and they know they’re already being accused just by being asked the question… so they get very defensive… “Why are you asking me this?”, or “That’s totally inappropriate.” I have actually had the full length of this discussion with many women and not one of them has had sex with me… so I actually think there is a serious sociopathy going on here, I’m not looking for pity, never have, I look for that urge to have sex with something that actually cares about the world being a better place in ways that are demonstrable, that excitement to have sex with someone who finally isn’t a psychopath…

But oddly enough, they’ll agree to disagree, even though they’ll admit that it’s true…

They are still asleep to this regard…

I know psychopathy is curable because I’ve done it inside myself… I acted out to get sex as well, and then I woke up and realized the magnitude of the problem, and trained myself with great discipline not to do these things again, because I fully understand the consequences of acting out to get sex from women.

Like i said, I believe in something after this, perhaps it’s re-incarnation or an afterlife… some alien species that has lived for trillions of years hopping through universe after universe could probably retrieve our consciousness signatures and manipulate planes of existence with just a fraction of their spiritual resources… who knows?

I just know that people need this education and I know that men will understand it better than women, and men are basically in charge of all the weapons here and land disputes. If they think not coming to agreements because they are still in their subconscious about women is going to improve this world, they are mistaken… don’t be the thing you hate.

I watch a show called American Ninja Warrior because it is an analogy for moving through life’s obstacles and the determination to move through them. However, many team sports I don’t enjoy whatsoever… I can enjoy things that show human capacity, because we are curious about these things. But when it comes to football, baseball, basketball, hockey and soccer and rugby etc… this is nothing but conspicuous consumption aggression, people just do this to get sex and nothing else, the pay is high because females prize conspicuous consumption aggression.

Teams get depressed when they lose because they’ll have less sexual choice, the same goes for fans of team sports… they may get one nights less sex with their wife even, because their team lost. It’s interesting when you get into things that are completely about conspicuous consumption aggression, even racecar driving… it has zero practical use and does nothing to reduce the homicide, suicide and rape rates of this world… in fact, their celebrations, if they were more aware of their surroundings are about working to increase them so they can get women to have sex with them. It’s really quite appalling to me.

There is the subject of dance. I don’t like to dance. This is an easy way to meet women, so already I get cautious… technically it is part of the “game”, and anything that works on women causes war… couples can dance after they’ve already had sex, because technically it’s flirting before sex. But even given this, I simply don’t like to dance, and I don’t consider this a moral argument. Some people don’t like any music at all, and there is some that I like… I don’t think these are moral arguments, I consider them akin to the necessary diversity of life… like people liking different foods. When it starts to become a moral argument is when you’re dealing with the suicide, homicide and rape rates, which is higher selection of conspicuous consumption aggression over non-conspicuous consumption aggression.

I need to explain why the sexual revolution didn’t work, why all the feminists who marched against marriage in the 70’s are all married now. It’s because of sexual stratification. People didn’t talk about this during the sexual revolution. Women also actually want to be marked as sexual territory. It even occurs in communes where people try to run intentional communities around sexuality, even nudist colonies. Sexual stratification is a VERY serious problem, sexual neglect of kindness is also a VERY severe problem.

I have a very good sense of the female intuition system… I can gauge it just by walking down the street.

I have to admit that compared to what I will become, I am still young in this world, I have made many mistakes in judgement in my past, because of my subconscious lashing out at masculinity and femininity. But most of what I am telling you will stand the test of time.

Men act out for sex, not for money (that’s for sex), not for fame (that’s for sex), not for land, (that’s for sex), not even for food in a socially stratified society (that also is for sex)… the reason we have all these problems is that women are sexually attracted to conspicuous consumption aggression. And men are sexually blackmailed by this, flirting with a woman to get sex is part of the sexual blackmail system.

Women flirt constantly, and flirting is a horrible thing to do… talking like adults is the real way to approach sex, women flirt because they want to gather many men in their circle as prospective mates, “boy toys” with fantasies, to increase their power. And women wonder why they are objectified so much.

Actually the second reason women are objectified so much is because of sexual neglect from sexual stratification… it makes them more desirable physically than psychologically or emotionally… because such a large percentage of men receive so little of the female sexual variety.

Since this objectification of women is what actually works to get sex, again, women want sexually what they complain about and cause.

I will repeat, men should not act out to get sex from women. The crime of sexual neglect is very severe… and the subconscious just wants equitable sexuality and it revenges upon the women in a multitude of ways because they give assholes most their sex and they stratify so much higher than males do to them. Don’t touch them, don’t flirt with them, and don’t worry about how much it hurts that they do this… men have been telling women that assholes get the most sex since before people could talk and women by pointing out the asshole behavior and it’s consequences and to this day women still treat them like shit, women actually have revenge sex by a.) not having sex with them, and b.) having sex with the asshole they pointed to.

This sends a message to all men through the female sexual blackmail system that you are NOT allowed to talk about this problem.

If all men are wonderful and kind and there is still sexual stratification… it will cause no war or homicide, but it will cause massive suicide… and before these men suicide, they will endure suffering worse than a concentration camp. Women need to realize how severe a crime this is… they think they can just blow it off like it’s nothing. My advice for community, not some great master off all things, but actual community, all being the masters of all things, not the drama of a king or queen above all, is to actually sit down and start communicating about sex and the problems we have with it and how to distribute it better.

If people don’t do this, they really are psychopaths. And let me explain something to you about justice. There was a man who killed people in LA because he thought that God was telling him to kill them to prevent an earthquake, and you know what the humans rightly did… they sent him to jail because he was a psychopath.

People think they can plead the insanity defense?

The reason it’s so traumatic for men subconsciously to deal with sexual stratification, is that it’s so hard to put words to it, and when they are very sensitive and kind, their subconscious realizes something, NOBODY said it before… which means, that there was no benevolent God, there was no all wise Jesus and there was no all wise Buddha… that it was a crock of shit. Atheists deal with this, who are less sensitive, by being blackmailed by the female sexual blackmail system, to cope… but it’s actually CRUSHINGLY hard on the men to work with this problem.

So much pressure is put on anyone who says the words I just spoke, and so much existential despair…

As I said earlier, taking vows of no sex on a plane where sex is a reward system and a planet where sexual rivalry causes the brutality of the mind, is a way of trying not to be seen a sexual rival so people will leave you alone, rather than actually setting a good example within the system and confronting it.

It is also important to understand that symbols, idols even Tibetan Prayer Flags (which try to spiritually patent colors and animals to their own ideology) is not a very smart way to reduce aggression… people don’t want colors or animals with spiritual patents… this is probably even worse than bells on churches.

But as I said before, this is no reason to act out upon them… acting out is just a way to abuse people because of how people have oriented themselves with the sickness of female sexual symbols and distribution.

I don’t think the hells are going to be populated with anyone but the person there… I don’t think people can learn very well from this and it’s counterproductive to the lesson that if you are going to be anti-social, than you don’t deserve the social, even if that social is violence, as many people imagine hell to be.

I can’t imagine the point of a hell if it doesn’t allow a person to take responsibility for their behavior in ways that allow them to grow without harming others.

It is also important to understand that every Buddha has walked and taught and eaten… these are very practical things, they are not amoral people… an amoral person makes themselves a punching bag as a forgiver of brutality towards them without consequence. People would always try to seek such a person out, and it would be very unwise to take this stance, it also causes others to be abused by sending the message that abuse doesn’t matter if you reach the highest attainment. Of course it matters, that’s why they try to teach people ways to live more in harmony with each other, to facilitate ways that more enlightened states of mind can be attained.

They call people who have sex amongst other things, and practice Buddhism, “Lay Monks”. If you can enable and disable attachments at will, it should be no problem to have a sexual life and then leave it behind you after you have set a good example… The question is whether someone has this discipline.

This probably seems very radical to a Buddhist… but it is my observation of the truth behind the teachings, to set a good example given our differences and to let go when we need to.

I hope you saved these and distributed them well.

We could have been the Bonobo, with progressive sexuality and no war or suicide as a sentient species… but we are more like chimpanzees. If we had evolved from Bonobo DNA, the very first words we would have spoken were “sexual politics if not handled properly causes war, environmental degradation, unjust social stratification, homicide and massive suicide.” And we would have all deserved our sex.

As it sits, the only person who has deserved sex is me, the first person who said this. That’s how screwed up this species was. The year 2014, some guy says this, EVERYONE should have said this and known it. Look into your sacred texts for that wisdom!!!

Now, I took responsibility, I decided I’d never use euphoric recall for some of my best memories in life because they were ill gotten gains… to not be a psychopath,

What this means, is that everyone who was ever born on this earth who never spoke these sentences, cannot use euphoric recall for any of the sex they had before i was born. I hate this, but it’s the truth. It’s not my fault, I’m not trying to send people to hell or be a downer… but for some stupid reason, nobody said this before me.

I’m sure as psychopaths, you won’t believe that you shouldn’t use euphoric recall for all of your sexual memories (euphoric recall just means a pleasant flashback), but coming from a non-psychopath… this is like a rapist-serial killer masturbating to their crimes. That goes for every human ever born before me. Do you have any idea how much it sucks to have to break this news to everyone?

I’m sure you’ll think I’m insane… but you can start over again, we all can, we don’t have to live in that past… we will be judged for it. I hate to break the bad news, and trust me, it really sucks to be me, but there is a way to start anew here.

There is a story of the prodigal son in the bible, where the child who acts out the most comes back to god and god celebrates with a feast that God never set for his good sons.

The problem with this story, and I’ll just use sexual selection facts, is that the assholes get the most sex, so when the son repents, god just gives them lots of sex, and the good sons get no sex.

The good sons commit suicide and God is an asshole.

(channelled some entity - it could be lying)

You’re not dealing with the son any more…

Everyone here is forgiven, but they will reap what they sow.

This whole world could end atomic cataclysm, and I will find the guilty. This world is nothing, but your souls are everything.

Love is more valuable than any material thing. Not love in the human sense, but love for your souls.

This is my final word.

(End of channelling)

I do happen to know that because we live in an unbound infinity that a being cannot be all knowing, because it would have to parallel process it’s own future which hasn’t expanded yet through infinity.

Now, it is possible that if you knew all the variables, you could predict the future, but this is not the same as omniscience…

What I mean, is that there are laws that were formed from the asymmetry, these laws are necessary for existence to exist, the more of these laws you know, the better you can understand cause and effect…

I actually don’t know the full scope of this phenomenon. I do know the law of sexual stratification and increased stress, depression, agitation and apathy in the stratified population… that is true of any species that has orgasms that is social.

Even if you were to make 80% of the sexually stratified population asexual, it would cause stress, depression, agitation and apathy for the other gender when they went to settle down with a primary partner after having stratified their sex.

This is a LAW.

Gravity can be defied on other planes, sometimes we see these planes in dreams… gravity is not a LAW, the sexual stratification LAW always holds for all possible universes.

The important thing to learn from the sexual stratification law is that you should not act out against others because of it. Obviously, you can defend others who are being acted out against, because to sit back is a form of neglect, and abetting the abuse.

When dealing with others, it is important to get them more out of their subliminal minds, and you can only do this through teaching, a weapon can never achieve this result… so spread the information I know, and wake people up to this degree, you might find they are more amiable to resolving their differences if they understand the controlling variables of their acting out.

A Darwinian theorist might say that men are just acting out to show their fitness as a potential mate… There are several problems with this. Firstly, war doesn’t increase species fitness… it actually decreases it, as I mentioned earlier, if women had simply killed every man in their sleep with even the most primitive cutting tools who said they were going to war, the female sexual blackmail system would be inverted and there’d never be any war. If they were psychologically oriented that way, to understand that this person just confessed to committing atrocities such as brutal war and rape… and then they just let them walk out the door.

I don’t believe that our technological innovations come from war, as some theorists have suggested… I believe our war innovations have come from war. People would still discover the scientific method and find out that disease is caused by small creatures and look for ways of curing them, given that they cannot just magically heal people, and people would also make communication innovations, since we are a social species, which means that the internet probably would have been invented as well.

I actually cannot find a reason from an evolutionary point of view when taking fitness into account, why we didn’t evolve like the Bonobo…

I also cannot understand from a theological perspective why nobody ever pointed out that sexual stratification is high on the male side and that this causes increased stress, depression, apathy and agitation for the men. Or talking about how people respond to the subconscious. Particularly, that women tend to want to be dominated with the cues they send out and men engage in this behavior to try to please the women, even though women complain about this. Women don’t seem to understand the implications of how severe a crime it is to actually flirt with anyone, and especially approach them in a manner that even suggests an attempt to get sex from them, even if it’s just the man who knows it.

[Ecmandu]

These things were very easy to observe in ancient times, and in very crude ways people have been saying this with language and body language since we started here. We have the phrase “nice guys finish last”, we have the phrase of the “game”, which is playing coy but really flirting at the same time, the game is a rather broad topic and players are generally referred to as the men and the game is generally referred to as the men playing it and not the women. This is because men know that women don’t need a game for sex… women don’t need to wear make-up, dress in any sort of way… not that these things are bad if women do do this, they just shouldn’t be under the illusion that there is such a thing as the female game.

Now Richard Dawkins came out with a video about reciprocal altruism called nice guys finish first, and what I find is that he’s actually just defending the female denial system to get sex, because the truth is… he never talked about the asshole problem, nor did he discuss sexual stratification and its effects on the mind.

As I said before… even if all the men stopped warring today, if the females continue to use a blackmail system of denial to let a man have sex with her and the sex is still stratified, this will cause men serious problems, unless the accept the female sexual blackmail system and defend women… basically, unless they are assholes.

This would cause a very high suicide rate in the male population, under very severe suffering… the suicide rate would be so high that it would basically be genocide, of all the non-assholes.

This is incomprehensible to me how people could be so stunningly shallow just to get laid.

We’re talking about a law that holds for all possible universes!!!

When I said that I don’t understand from a theological perspective who someone didn’t point this out before… I more accurately meant why EVERYONE didn’t point this out before. Why we just weren’t more like the Bonobo in the first place…

It’s very difficult to defend the concept of a moral creator of this species when some very basic advice wasn’t delivered to us about how this LAW of social species with orgasms works in all possible universes.

I’m actually, completely baffled why someone just didn’t give this advice who we consider highly revered in our history…

It’s almost like they just decided to avoid the issue, or perhaps they just didn’t know… maybe they became celibate or chaste because the subconscious understands that people find non-sexual rivals less aggressive and they were more interested in social power, and made this trade-off for security.

Either way, it baffles me.

When dealing with women, I am often charged with sexually blackmailing the gender that sexually blackmails an entire gender… Perhaps this is true. When I am told that female’s are turned off by being called psychopaths… oddly enough, a non-psychopath wouldn’t have this response, they wouldn’t get defensive, they’d say, “I’m not a psychopath, you are wrong, and I can prove it.” But this is not my experience with women. Women think that their “contracts” transcend the deeper truths of reality, this is part of their denial system, part of their sexual blackmail system.

[Ecmandu]

I said that you can bind structures by adding infinities.

Say…

0.999999….
0.00…01

The problem with this and the reason we have the asymmetry is because these never actually converge, so I made an error in saying you can sum infinities to fuse bound structures.

The reason the infinity is never bound is because it goes on forever… but something happens here… now these are just mathematical infinities and not referents, which also have infinities… what happens in a finite universe is that positives and negatives always cancel each other out, leaving no existence… but with an unbound infinity, even though they cancel each other out, they never stop canceling each other out. This is why it is absolutely necessary for infinity to be there in order for us to exist.

Because a bound infinity would cause the problem of either zero time for an event to occur (which means it didn’t occur) or infinite time to occur, which means it never occurs, we have an asymmetry from this lack of convergence which causes objects to cluster finitely, beginnings and endings, motion, encoding of information. This clustering allows for the continuity of consciousness, the same thing that allows us to remember ourselves, allows us to remember objects.

In the context of this asymmetry, you need variety, otherwise everything will be exactly the same and be nothing at all (which would be a convergence of the infinity)… this is why there is so much variety in life.

There are no such things as bound infinities, they are ordered infinities.

There are an infinite amount of ordered infinities, infinite lists infinite dimensions per list… etc…

To even start the entire unbound sequence you have to calculate a number horizontally in dimension 2 (infinite lists) that has no sequence… I still haven’t proven this yet, but it’s my intuition…

I know a lot about sequencing infinities because of mirroring techniques (the technique I used to count all the rationals).

I’ll get to the good part later, because I know you specifically study consciousness.

I call this the mirroring technique, I figured it out when I realized that you could take a mirror to all of the natural numbers and get all of the decimal outputs…

The way it works is that the first ten numbers are counted just as themselves and their negatives:

0,1, -1,2, -2,3, -3,4, -4,5, -5,6, -6,7, -7,8, -8,9, -9

Then after that you count 10 and then the next number is the mirror of 10, which is 01 and then you move the decimal point in once to get the 12th number being 0.1, then the thirteenth number (not counting the negatives which are numbered every other) is 0.(1 repeating). These steps continue until you reach three digit numbers and higher. Once you count 100, you then count the next number as 0.01, then 0.0(1 repeating) then 0.(01 repeating), then you count 101 and it’s mirror. If you keep marching in the decimal point when the number that’s about to be mirrored ends in zero it causes infinite overlap. The number 100 ends in a zero, so after you mirror it you only march the decimal in for one place to the right, if you march it two places to the right, you end up with 00.1, which is the same mirror that you get when the number 10 is mirrored, and will occur an infinite number of times as the zeros expand and you keep marching in the decimal point (which will give you infinite overlap as the sequence expands).

However, if the number doesn’t end in a zero, you keep marching in the decimal point, say the number 102. The next number is mirroring it, so it’s 2.01, then you do the repeating decimals by next counting 2.0(1 repeating) and then 2.(01 repeating), then you march the decimal point in once more to get 20.1, and then you do the repeating decimals by having 20.(1 repeating). (If you march the decimal in one more time, you get 201, and have infinite overlap as well.) Then you count the number 103 and then mirror it and do this forever.

Now the situation with consciousness, is that it comes from a paradox… the primary paradox being the overlap of I am That…

which carries with it, the base paradox of “Something needs to be something other than what it is.” and also subsumes itself with I am I and That is That, which is why we have these three concepts.

What this paradox does, is that it never quite converges because the infinity is unbound, so we see ourselves and other objects because of this lack of convergence. This is a necessary part of our reality. When infinities are bound, the capability to discern sequence itself ceases… this causes everything to be destroyed, but when everything including all referents are destroyed, you are still left with an unbound infinity of the destruction of everything forever, and since this infinity is unbound, you haven’t actually destroyed anything… This is a fancy way of saying that if existence converges and all infinities are counted it destroys existence, but all infinities cannot be counted, so we have existence, it’s not bound, it’s unbound, and an unbound infinity can neither be created nor destroyed it can only be discovered. This also means that a being cannot be omniscient or omnipotent, though there can be hierarchies of beings.

What happens when the infinity, which by definition never ends, cannot converge, is that we get something called asymmetry, which is a fancy way of saying, we exist instead of not existing and existence needs to exist instead of not existing. This asymmetry causes a birth and death process to comprehend itself, even though it is always there. To actually figure out where it all came from will force a convergence which will destroy existence, but existence isn’t ever destroyed (one of those proofs is that we exist – if it were destroyed, the past present and future would also be destroyed, including us).

Because if information flooding ( a lack of convergence and limited processing speed) we cannot actually know everything, and we’ll all be at least slightly different. Even if the same reality is copied an infinite number of times, there is still a listing process which makes them all slightly different, this was highlighted by my example of this infinite list…

1.) 1
2.) 1
3.) 1
4.) 1
5.) 1

etc….

This infinite list has a very specific process, you cannot actually add 1 to this infinity, it causes dimensional flooding because they are all ones, so you need to actually create a new list to add another 1, either a new string of all 1’s or a list that at least has 1, 1, in it.

When infinities converge as bound, we have a situation where sequence breaks down completely.

What this means, is that if say, my coffee cup was a bound infinity… I’d be processing forever or infinitely fast, which means it could never actually be there.

The problem that arises with several old paradoxes, is that people keep thinking you can actually process a bound infinity, think of zeno’s paradoxes, instead of being able to solve it as necessarily needing to destroy the scenario. What happens with these paradoxes as well is that we are not stepping on the same ground twice… and this goes to the concept of division. One of the ideas of a bound infinity is that you can divide something an infinite number of times… there are many problems with this, but the most glaring is that once you divide it even once, it ceases to be the same object, thus by contradiction, you cannot divide it anymore, it becomes a new object… and resolves paradoxes such as this. The asymmetry doesn’t let us process unbound infinities.

One way to imagine this is to understand that when infinities become bound, this means that all finite data equal zero exactly, which means that it cannot possibly occur. Another way to imagine this, is that if existence were ever destroyed, we would not be here, because the past present and future are destroyed. The only reason we see stuff is because the infinity never converges and it is not bound, this allows information to flow and an expansion process.

The confusion comes entirely from the concept that an infinity can actually be bound, and then applying concepts of time and space to them.

By definition of infinity, there is no highest order of infinity, and it is false that they cannot be counted… you can list any sequence with an algorithm… if the algorithm itself has infinite processing time, then there is no sequence. Cantor and Chaitin were wrong.

It’s considered a mathematical proof ala Cantor from over 140 years ago that all of the real numbers cannot be counted…

I use a techinique called 1 dimensional flooding to show that all of the reals cannot be counted in one list with one dimension, which is differnt than Cantors diagonalization argument.

use the lists…

012345678910…
123456789101…
234567891011…
345678910111…
456789101112…
567891011121…
678910111213…

etc…

To do one dimensional flooding, you simply add an infinite list to each place in the previous infinite list…

024681012151…
036912151821…
048121620242…
051015202530…

When the list converges at infinity, there is no way to begin counting…

12345678910…
13579111315…
14812162024…

Because you never pass the zero’s.

This is the proof that we cannot determine the limit of how much we can count.

Sorry forgot to add the disproof of Cantor’s diagonalization argument…

Once you do one dimensional flooding, you have to expand to another dimension to keep listing the sequences… diagonals can be subsumed by a third dimension, say list 1.1, or list 5.7 etc… or a 4th dimension 1…1, 5…7, etc…

It’s actually easy to absorb the diagonals by starting from the center and listing them from top to bottom in sequence using another dimension… what this means is that cantors proof that you cannot count all the reals is false. It also means that you cannot find the limit on what can be calculated!!! except that it cannot be everything!!!

I think you might be able to use infinite dimensional flooding for infinite dimensions which proves through the dimensional flooding technique that all the reals cannot be counted. Hmm… put another way, you wouldn’t be able to start the list if you counted all the reals.

I’ve basically proven it in my head I just haven’t expressed it yet. I did however disprove Cantors diagonalization argument as a disproof for this. You can tell from my technique that there is an unknown limit less than infinity but greater than nothing where knowledge cannot be absorbed by one being!!!

The solution to P / NP is that everything cannot be computed and that we cannot know the limit of what can be computed, there will be an infinite number polynomial, non-polynomial and polynomial/non-polynomial sequences.

Basically… in order to count an entire infinity at once it creates a soup that renders consciousness impossible, past present or future, any ability to be sentient or to detect motion or have a thought.

There are no bound infinities… this is mathematical hokum.

You can sum infinities, but these are just approximations… many infinities cannot even be summed.

Basically, the way you solve paradoxes is just to say that they cause unbound infinities… the base paradox is that “something is necessarily something other than what it is.” The way this actually computes, is not “true or false” it’s not an oscillating paradox either… what it does is open up an unbound infinity for all referents… the answer could be something, nothing, everything, zero, you, me, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5…, and since we know these never converge as bound we can eliminate the lack of sequence this causes… while still understanding that if we could solve the paradox by counting all the referents (a bound infinity), there’d be no sequence. This is a way of resolving the paradox by saying that we know something but not everything, and you don’t have to know everything to know this, just something… so it doesn’t cause a paradox to solve this paradox.

When dealing with infinities, the same thing occurs… we know that all the real numbers sum to zero, but it’s actually only an approximation because infinity by definition never ends…. it’s the same as saying .999… equal 1. There is no convergence here without summing the infinity… which uses the infinitessimal .0…1. It is this summing which converges the infinity, not the actual infinity itself.
Infinities aren’t bound by nature, but summing them can bind them into workable mathematical entities that converge to realistic scenarios.

The function of existence which uses paradox to make us aware of ourselves causes continuity of memory over time… this continuity allows us to group objects into clusters, even though it’s never the same object or cluster. I talked about this earlier with Zeno. The track in the Achilles and Tortoise changes every time, which ends the infinite regress problem. Division is fundamentally a problem of the continuity of memory over time in clusters, but cannot be actual bound infinities.

Now, since there is a constant expansion through unbound infinity, this constant expansion reflects back to us in the form of change and retaining and encoding information that never gets lost… technically, you could call this the process of creation, though I haven’t quite solved this entirely. You cannot create an unbound infinity and you cannot create the necessary asymmetry, but clearly we observe many creative processes occurring.

There should be an infinite number of what we would call finite realities, and this doesn’t allow for the capacity to know all of them. This is what actually makes time move. As I said earlier, if everything was finite, everything would cancel itself out into nothing at al and there’d be no existence, because infinity is unbound we have memories and the experience of existence which necessitates the perception of beginnings and endings. If there were perfect symmetry the big bang would never have occurred. It’s the asymmetry caused by unbound or non-convergent infinity which allows and necessitates existence to exist.

Another problem with the concept of a bound infinity is that no matter how large a finite sequence in the infinity is, when it is all counted, it becomes exactly zero, which means it never existed. The ONLY way something can exist is if there are no bound infinities.

Now, one of the major issues that divides community are particular forms of falsehoods, such as signs of authority or trying to spiritually patent colors or land, ceremonies, bows, saluted, certain hand gestures of fidelity, don’t promise anything, nor do symbols of fidelity (like a marriage or ring), because they don’t actually promise anything, people who are more honest simply don’t use them.

Honest discussion of these topics is the best way to get working with building a better world, as has always been the case.

It’s very easy to disprove the idea of the Bible on many levels, but the book throughout the old and new testament says that God is a man and that God sits on a throne… but it is known that sitting on thrones has a divisive element to community, just as putting a bell on a church divides community more than placing it at a public square or community center. Psychologically… it is a form of mental pollution when the loudest or biggest is used to denote status when it comes to objects or symbology, it’s actually probably against the constitution itself to have the loudest noise in a city (noise pollution) come from a particular ideology that is easy to disprove with reason as dividing community. The term they tried to use to describe this is idolatry, but this is a decidedly religious term.

One problem with omnipotence and omniscience comes up with what I call, an
omnisexual…. an omnisexual would have to take an infinite number of sticks
in a infinite number of sizes and and infinite number of combinations and
stick them up their rectum. This is impossible… thus there is no
omniscient, omnipotent being.

Either it has to do it infinitely fast, which in a bound infinite equals zero
time, which means they didn’t do anything at all, or they have to do it
forever, which means they never complete all of the sequences.

When i said a being cannot be omnipotent or omniscient because of not being able to stick an infinite number of sticks up its butt in an infinite number of ways, being a telepath, someone suggested that it could be done with an infinite number of assholes. I was stumped for about 5 minutes because I was thinking of it linearly, instead of with combinatory logic. The way to get around this argument is that it has to do every combination in each of the infinite assholes, which still leaves you with the one asshole problem. It doesn’t matter how many dimensions of rectums you use, it still solves the same.

The reason this argument is important and it’s very easy to imagine, is because a being not only cannot do this with infinite power, it clearly cannot know what it’s like to do this either. What’s important about this is that potence arguments and knowledge arguments cannot defy logic.

What’s more important about the larger paper I sent is that if the reality at large was finite, everything would cancel everything out into nothingness, it wouldn’t exist at all, which defeats the kalam argument that there are no infinities. In fact you can prove that the only way we can perceive time or motion or space or anything is if the infinities exist, which by definition are unbound, and being unbound, never converge and create asymmetry which is the necessary existence we are in.

If there were no infinities, everything would cancel each other out and there would be nothing at all… the only possible way that motion or expansion can even occur is if there’s an unbound infinity at the base of everything. What this means in terms of dimensions is that there are no higher or lower dimensions, there are most likely, simply an infinite number of them, though there seem to be in my experience, beings that possess greater power… the feedback from the lack of symmetry (because the unbound infinity never converges) causes what is the asymmetry of our experience. This asymmetry allows for discrete data to retain the continuity of consciousness and our moral and mathematical theorems and perfection… though perfection theory is margin of error theory.

The whole point of beginnings is that it’s impossible to hold an unbound infinity in consciousness, so in order to be conscious, we need beginnings, such as a big bang… though if it weren’t for the asymmetry, there’d have never been the expansion of time and space, even though these are both unbound themselves…

It’s a perceptual distortion caused by sentient perception, necessarily so.

I’ve been thinking about the evolution of decision theory in the context of
asymmetry from an unbound infinity, and my conclusion is that we can hold
multiple spaces at once and make decisions from being able to project
outcomes, given our equilibriums, which can also change with time.

There are hard limits on decision theory, say someone wants to destroy
existence, well, that’s impossible, and it’s easy to prove. So perhaps it’s
more like wanting to destroy a sequence of events that are undesirable in the
context of existence. This is part of the quantum aspect of existence, the I am that idea that develops the “I am that”, “I am I” and “that is that” aspects of existence.

Basically, in terms of your interest, my take on the mind body problem is
that there must be some type of corporeal essense for a mind, the reason I
think this is because, mind itself probably has some type of substance
through which the media is transmitted otherwise it wouldn’t exist.

The reason existence cannot be destroyed is actually because of infinity, if you destroyed it, you’d still have the unbound infinity of it’s destruction forever… what this means, is that you cannot destroy unbound infinity, it is the base of the cosmos.

Because unbound infinities never converge, we have what’s called asymmetry instead of nothing at all, if they do converge, we have no asymmetry and everything cancels itself out.

No matter how large a finite amount of time or referents in an infinite set you use, when an infinity is bound, all finite sequences equal exactly zero. The only way we can even detect finite motion is if infinities aren’t bound.

We are able to abstract infinities because we’re in one, we just can’t count them all, no sentient being can.

Counting an infinity causes a soup problem… it completely destroys the capacity to discern a sequence of any type whatsoever… the “last” number would be in every spot, every number would be in every spot… when dealing with referrents such as “Existence” “Consciousness” “trees” “Oblivion”, if you were to count the infinite number of referents it would yield the inability to form a referent, the being could not be sentient.

It’s important to understand that the base paradox is that something necessarily has to be other than what it necessarily is, which actually opens up all referents, and not just oscillation or true false. This fundamental paradox causes self awareness in the context of other objects. It is a fundamental aspect of reality.

We wouldn’t even be aware of infinity if we weren’t actually in one, and it’s important to understand that there are always positives and negatives for everything. In a finite reality, considering all referents, this is non-existence. However, as i said at the beginning… when dealing with infinities, even if they cancel each other out… they do so forever, so you’re still left with an existence.

You may want to take my suggestions about how to handle men a bit more seriously… I hope you didn’t delete those e-mails.

Sexual injustice causes people to suffer or act out. Acting out is unacceptable and sexual injustice is unacceptable.

[voltaire]

You might not realize it now, but you’d likely be much better off if you follow the labels on all your prescriptions. Consider doing that now, or wish you had and regret it later - your choice.

[Budget_Player_Cadet]

…What the hell am I even reading? I got a few paragraphs in before he lost me, and skimming I saw, among other things:

-“I am the most deserving in my species of sex”
-“0.0000…001”

One problem with omnipotence and omniscience comes up with what I call, an
omnisexual…. an omnisexual would have to take an infinite number of sticks
in a infinite number of sizes and and infinite number of combinations and
stick them up their rectum. This is impossible… thus there is no
omniscient, omnipotent being.

What even… I was just looking for a nice thread where I might be able to mess with some creationists. I think this thread gave me PTSD.

[running_coach]

MS Word says:
33 pages
15,856 words
90,640 characters including spaces
6 paragraphs
1,480 lines

Wow.

[Guinastasia]

Cool story, bro.

[RivkahChaya]

I see a thread getting closed by the time all the mods have had lunch tomorrow.

[Knorf]

TL;DR.

[tomndebb]

The Registration Agreement notes that one is not to use the SDMB as a way to promote one’s personal agenda.
Get a blog and stop cluttering up this board with your fantasies.
[ /Moderating ]