I just read the Bagavad Gita 18:6 “But even these works should be done in the freedom of pure offering, and without expectation of a reward. This is my final word.”
There is a very fundamental problem with this passage, which is that Krishna is the creator and sustainer of the cosmos… being the creator, Krishna expects that when Krishna creates happiness that happiness will be created, and since expectation sends someone to hell realms, anytime someone creates happiness within the context of a cosmic consciousness (Krishna, or particularly the Godhead which always expects their creations to manifest), they will be sent to a hell realm… which means that nobody is allowed to create happiness.
I personally think this points to a problem about the buddhist idea of scorning non-entitlement. I’ll show you a problem that is caused by a severe injustice, and how this severe injustice, and the justified entitlement from observing it has direct consequences on the human species…
Sent to Geoffrey Miller and Steven Pinker and David Buss and David Schmitt and the administrations Global Development Council,
There are points of distribution of sexual variety that I haven’t considered before, which is that they MAY? be more equitable than I had previously considered… because of the heavy prostitution on the female side, and I’ll just leave it at that for the time being.
However, I have considered some type of utopic ideal where everyone is well adjusted and reasonable healthy and there is an inequitable distribution of sexual variety, and my thinking is that the gender with less sexual variety will experience more stress and depression, and being well adjusted would move, instead of acting out, to a more suicidal place.
I have considered many angles, such as… perhaps the other gender DESIRES there to be high stratification for the other gender, so that it doesn’t depress them, but then I realized that this desire would be equitably distributed as well, so it wouldn’t solve the depression and stress problem.
Let’s assume there are STD’s. One of the issues here is that sexual variety that’s more equitably distributed increases the odds that STD’s are transmitted through the population. The problem here is that this would mean there would be a higher ration of STD’s amongst both the highly stratified gender and that more equitable gender, which isn’t actually true, so I think it might not actually as clear cut to this regard.
I am completely revamping many of the concepts around the lines of thinking I have worked with before, and thank you for taking these into consideration.
When I sent an e-mail before, I discussed some idea of a nonviolence in the context of inter-human relationship and discussed how sexual stratification would increase stress and depression on the side being sexually stratified. I have also pondered a society where everyone basically gets beaten up by everyone in ways where their wounds recover, yet the same sexual stratification occurs… which would also cause increase stress and depression on the sexually stratified side. The question, is that it is in my opinion, very certain that this causes increased stress and depression. The question that we perhaps ponder is whether and why this stress turns inwards or outwards and which is the best coping mechanism or best rational way to approach this, given that I actually think such stress is a healthy orientation to the situation.
Does sexual distribution theory account for most if not all of our problems, or perhaps narrower ones.
It does seem like more equitable distribution builds community, which may very well be able to bring people closer together, rather than agitate them or make them extremely flat and perhaps hopeless.
One of the issues of the impact of sexual distribution theory is it’s impact on religion, because the idea is so profound and simple and extremely common if not unspoken knowledge and it is so completely absent from our religious texts of all the great enlightened masters that it questions the very concept of a source having actually come to this planet to give us some of the best possible advice.
In my opinion, more equitable distribution of sexual variety would build richer social bonds in terms of community.
There is one possibility, which might solve this, which is that the gender that is being highly stratified has a very large, if not “perfect” asexual population… which would not make them depressed at all, but that leads to some situations that I have yet to even begin to meditate upon.
It has occurred to me that when one takes prostitution into account, perhaps just loosely defined as the exchange of sex for money or resources that exclude the totality of the beings psychological state or perhaps even physical appearance, that it is my intuition that prostitutes tend not to have many people in their circles, even though there are alot of them on the female side. So it’s possible the sexual stratification is still higher on the male side. Also, it has occurred to me that female prostitution may be a result of the sexual stratification… by hoarding the resource, they can subsequently create conditions where it is highly commodified. I’m sure it is much more complex than this, but I wanted to throw the idea out there. In fact the irony of the mental health system itself being mostly run by women may itself be a commodity caused by their sexual stratification, which, males not getting sex, would cause repeated PTSD and keep the system running to keep them employed. It has occurred to me that sexual surrogacy doesn’t solve the stratification of sexual variety!!!
So, during the course of several interviews on the causal link between increased stress and depression and sexual stratification… pointing out that the suicide ratio is 30:1 or higher on the male side because of female sexual stratification, and pointing out that it cannot be testosterone because the male attempt rate would also be higher, I have found three women and one man come to a particular defense to try to deny the impact of this argument, to “defend the women”. They say, “I could just live the rest of my life without sex.” In fact the man said, "I wouldn’t want to have sex with someone who didn’t want to have sex with me, (which I agree with from a rape stance), however, I would use the analogy of food… let’s say nobody wanted to let you eat food (it’s come to my attention that “spirits” can simply not let you eat food… so I need people to understand this from a different perspective than the ordinary one of just being able to STEAL food.) You would DEBATE your capacity to deserve food… the interesting thing about these people is that they SHUN the social activism. In fact, they often might even say, that it’s not even causal at all. It’s a complete denial system, perhaps put there by women and their sexual and social blackmail system.
Anyhow, I keep pondering these ideas. Thanks for reading them and taking them into consideration.
I realized that when you look up the suicide ratio you will find numbers between 4-5:1, and I listed a number of 30:1 or greater (maybe as high as 50:1). More men commit suicide every year than all the deaths from war, homicide and female suicide combined. The reason for this is that most completed suicides for females are actually failed suicide attempts to make it look good to get more affection, men tend to rescue depression with intimacy more than women do. Women tend to, and this is a delicate and more complex topic, rescue bullishness and then proceed to try to turn this into the perfect man from there, a softer man who doesn’t berate others as much. This is why the female suicide attempt rate is higher, because of this causation, and it is why it is WAY higher than what is published by scientific journals, because in reality, most female suicide completions, while still completions, are actually failed suicide attempts, and men don’t tend to fail suicides, they also don’t tend to report depression as much as women, which is giving social scientists the impression that women are more depressed than men are… women report it, because they tend to get rescued for it. There is some stability for suicide completion in asexual and homosexual populations as well, and part of this is sexual discrimination because of the fact that the bullishness (picking on minorities in an unjustified manner) has high sexual selection value for men. Anyways, I could go on and on about this stuff… just wanted to clarify.
Part of the reason the black suicide rate is lower than the white population is because “game playing” is more prevalant in this culture (perhaps just on european continents), white males tend to try to be very kind people to get sex from women, which generally includes not approaching them, because of other complex topics. Part of the reason certain people don’t approach women is because they notice that men like to be approached more than women, although the topic is more complex than this.
Anyhow, I could go on and on about this stuff…
I thank you for reading this and taking it into consideration.
Hmm… part of what I could go on about is that sexual stratification forces men into marriage ceremonies because females in polysexual relationships get way more partners which emotionally hurts men (they get more partners because of the stratification of sexual variety), so they seek out monosexuality in order to avoid this… which also has to do with the very unprogressive march down the aisles, and wearing of rings etc… but these things would take some time to explain.
I have interviewed several people who are exceptionally happy being long time virgins as men “waiting for the right one”. I often explain to them that this is unrealistic because often a male can meet a woman who’s vagina is too small for penetration, and they often complain that the only downside to this stance about marriage and abstinence is that they can’t have sex. It is actually more layers of ignorance than this, but I tend to hold my tongue. I think vows of celibacy and chastity are caused by trying to fit in socially, because of aspects of human sexuality.
I actually have some really good game theory about decreasing violence with sexual distribution, but this world we live in now is a bit more complex. As Steven Pinker notes, violence is decreasing and the brutality of it is decreasing… and as I note, the male suicides in particular keep climbing.
I believe in an atonement process, and an atonement process involves preventing something that you may have caused… so all of the acting out I did and my subsequent behavioral modification to back when I was who I was 20 some years ago has effectively repaired the damage I may have done and turned things towards a more positive state. On the downside, I realized that almost everyone on earth is a psychopath.
I also have a philosophy of war… which is that even the plants war against viruses, bugs, molds, bacteria, fungus etc… constantly, to give us the beauty of them and the air that we breathe… this continual war brings us our beauty, it can bring peace, and it is possible that war can bring beauty and peace… I say this, of course, having the inclination towards non-violence in our species.
It will not be war that will be the major issue of our future in my estimation, it will be the intense suffering that rots someones soul into suicide from female sexual psychopathy. Technically, they are all serial killers. People do not live on a planet when they find out that over half the population is psychopathic and almost the entire other half is sexually and socially blackmailed by them to not speak up.
The problem is a bit more severe than say, war, because there is zero justification for this form of psychopathy, part of the problem being, everyone throughout history has known it, and it is crazy-making on an unfathomnable scale.
Everyone knows sexual stratification is high on the male side, everyone knows this increases stress and depression, everyone knows men like to be approached more than women do, yet women hardly approach men, unless the observe bullishness or evidence that they have approached other women in the past, this is part of how the female sexual blackmail system works.
Men have been telling women for 100’s of thousands of years that bullishness gets the most sex, and women, just simply ignoring them, get to the top of the mountain and declare that all men are bullish. Sexual stratification is so incredibly high, that women are always complaining about men wanting to have sex with lots of them and calling them pigs for it (even though women get as much sexual variety as they want), they create the very state of deprivation they complain about and then hypocritically accuse men for wanting what they have.
Equitable sexual distribution is a matter of morality not sexual orientation… there has never been a justified biological evolutionary reason for the high sexual stratification as long as this species has been on earth.
One of male and females favorite catch-phrases for this phenomenon is that we just agree to disagree.
From a purely game theory point of view it actually makes a female more secure from violence to give the larger numbers of kinder men more sex so they will gang up on the bullies in numbers larger than the bullies can fight off. This has to do with why there is no war or homicide in the bonobo.
I could really go on and on about this, but I thought you might be interested.
Female lives are not more valuable than male lives in terms of reproduction… if there were 3.5 billion men and one fertile woman, this species would still survive. In fact, if women committed as much suicide as men did, it wouldn’t even make a dent in the species. The fact of the matter is, women don’t care about men who want to make everyones future on this planet better… the only reason men don’t send women to war, is because they want more sexual variety, it’s also the same reason men hate rape and murder so much, not because of some birth myth about women being more valuable than men are. Women don’t give a shit about men getting sexual variety, so men are just stupid non-hypocritical pieces of shit who deserve to die for having a little bit of human depth.
Welcome to the suicide part. So progressive. The only reason women are paid less is because assholes get more sex than nice guys… but fuck, they’re all blowing their brains off. Enjoy your fucking world.
The distribution at 1:50 which is probably what it is, is 20,000 female suicides every year compared to 1,000,000 male suicides every year. Sexual stratification causes more suicide than RAPE and war trauma! And I fucking hate rape with all my heart. It actually causes MORE suffering to sexually stratify than to rape at a rate of 1:5.
I had to atone for fucking hitting on a few women in my life, because it fucking causes male suicide.
Welcome to the real world.
It’s very interesting to hear all the female rhetorical devices as they comfort each other with their gossip about men feeling bad for being sexually rejected, and how they seek someone who has more financial security and friendship than they do…
The main point is that war will eventually dissolve, but then we’re still left with female psychopathy killing millions of men every year by rotting their kind souls into unimaginable hells until they blow their brains out… I’m looking into the future here.
To sum up. The stratification of sexual variety has it so 1-20 of males get 99-80% of the female sexual partner variety and this very small percentage of men give women basically all the sexual variety they want in life. This injustice is causing mass suicides, and because this is causal (non-psychopaths don’t spend time in a world filled with psychopaths) they are actually serial killers.