Explain to me why I should watch the X-files

As I understand it, from the episodes I would skim when it was on broadcast TV, every week Mulder and Scully are called out to investigate a supernatural phenomenon. None of these phenomenon are subtle, they are usually glaringly obvious to be deviations from known laws of physics or advanced alien technology or ghosts. Every week, they fail to gather any evidence that would convince anyone else of their findings, or the evidence is conveniently disappeared before they can make copies of it. They are considered to be uncredible scumbags by their parent agency, and their reports are all ignored or disappeared by an omnipotent conspiracy that covers up all the evidence.

I just hate it. Any rational person who observed the things they saw in X-files would make every effort to collect evidence and let others know that our understanding of the world is deeply flawed. If “ghost ships”, people who can be supernaturally lucky, alien roach robots, invisible people, etc are all real, everyone else has a deeply flawed understanding of what reality even is. Imagine the advances we could make if the truth were well known and these kinds of phenomena could be studied. By incompetently failing to gather any proof, I feel that X-files agents commit a crime against humanity itself each and every week. (and if the first attempts to collect proof fail, the next time they should work a heck of a lot harder. Videotape everything. Make many copies. Don’t leave evidence unattended. And so forth)

In a show like Fringe, the supernatural phenomena are clearly real, lots of people know they are real, they stem from a single rational cause (parallel universe bleedover), and they frequently collect samples of the phenomenon of the week and sometimes use the device or agent in later episodes.

You shouldn’t watch The X-Files.

Also, given the title there is a disappointing lack of nudity.

If they were to make headway exposing all that stuff then the world of the show starts to be something we don’t recognize

It’s true. If you demand a rational explanation for everything, or that a pseudoscientific front end be slapped on something irrational, then it’s definitely not your show. The X-Files actually revels in the mystery and in the tension it creates between the two main characters, and that’s a lot of the fun.

Also, if you demand internal coherency, expect continuity between episodes, expect that the overarching story actually make sense, and that the writers have a plan and aren’t just making it up as they go along, then it is definitely not your show.

JAQ, 9 year X-Files sufferer (and owner of the DVD set)

Oh, yeah, that part. Skully remains “skeptical” despite personally seeing most of the stuff here.

Well, there we go. Apparently the folks who suggested that you probably shouldn’t watch it have a point! :wink:

I guess what you’re really asking is why others enjoy it. I actually dislike the vast majority of TV and watch very little, but I quite enjoyed the X-Files when it was on. I thought it was inventive and atmospheric and I was never bothered by overthinking it. I have a book somewhere with summaries of the episodes of some number of seasons that is quite lavishly illustrated and it’s hard to page through it without coming away with the impression that there was lots of eerie creativity there.

Well, way back in the DAY, when the show was new, it was passed off as based on actual unsolved case files from the FBI’s records. Which I guess was true, in that our two main characters were FBI agents, and they never seemed to solve much of anything. Chris Carter himself described the show as being based off of the old “Kolchak: Night Stalker” TV show, which was a monster of the week kind of thing. But it fooled me long enough to get me hooked on the characters and the monsters of the week… which led into aliens and Secret Govvamint Conspiracies…

X-Files was similar to Kolchak, except that it claimed to be based on truth (for the first season, anyway) and that instead of all these monsters showing up right around the corner from Kolchak, our protagonists were sent all over the country, investigating them, and usually not having anything concrete to report afterwards, which really made me wonder about their performance reviews. But the show was pretty good, at least until David Duchovny decided he was the new Cary Grant.

As to why anyone would want to watch new episodes of it… well… I dunno. Supernatural’s got the Monster Of The Week down, but it’s been showing its age pretty badly lately. But if you need a werewolves or alien fix, you could usually count on Mulder and Scully…

This is probably one of the most consistently inaccurate criticisms I’ve ever seen of a popular TV show.

Scully did not remain skeptical past about the second or third act of the pilot. By the end of the first episode, she was pretty much firmly on board with the idea that there was clearly something weird going on in the world at large, and that didn’t really change much for the rest of the show. What would usually happen was, she and Mulder would get called into a strange case, Mulder would immediately leap to the most fantastical explanation imaginable, while Scully would counter with a mundane explanation. Then they’d investigate, and the actual evidence would usually invalidate both their original ideas and end up with some other weirdness. Scully was skeptical, in as much as the fact that it was aliens last week, doesn’t mean she automatically accepts it’s aliens this week, until there’s proof that it’s aliens. But she doesn’t spend the entire series running around saying things like, “Aliens don’t exist!” after being beamed up by the Mothership in the last episode.

And they actually made some effort into mixing this up by showing episodes where what appeared to be a supernatural/extraterrestrial event ended up having a mundane explanation after all. The “lake monster” that was eating people turned out to be an escaped crocodile. The “hungry ghosts” that were eating people’s internal organs turned out to be a cover for a black market organ harvesting operation. Even the “robot cockroaches” you mentioned in your OP turned out to be a case of mass hysteria caused by a few odd (but perfectly rational) deaths. Plus there’s a handfull of episodes where Scully is the first person to go for the supernatural explanation, while Mulder demures.

Part of the concept of the show is the idea of seeing monsters/aliens/etc. in our world, which is to some extent inherently limiting. If too much knowledge about this stuff gets out, it stops looking like "our"world pretty quickly, killing part of the shows premise. Personally, I’d really like to see an X-File/Buffy/Supernatural show where you actually see how growing knowledge of the supernatural alters the world, but X-Files wasn’t that show. C’est la vie, but I felt X-Files actually did a pretty good job of justifying that lack of change. For one thing, part of the overarching plot is that there’s a large and powerful cabal of people who are deliberately suppressing information about aliens, so it’s not just that people won’t listen, it’s that there’s people deliberately obfuscating the truth. And when the Conspiracy wasn’t part of a particular episode, they were reasonably clever about resolving things in a way that there’s no hard evidence left behind. And even then, they’d occasionally subvert it - there’s one episode where they find a Frankenstein’s Monster sort of guy, the result of genetic manipulation that created a hideously deformed, but intelligent and well-meaning person. That episode ended with Scully and Mulder convincing him to go public, and culminates with a hilarious montage of him becoming a minor celebrity, getting interviewed by Sally Jesse Raphael, and going out clubbing.

Of course, it was a long running show worked on by many different writers, and in some episodes the reset just don’t make sense. But that’s a problem with the medium as much as the show in particular.

For my money, where the show really fell down was in the “mythology” episodes, the (relatively, particularly for the time) continuity-heavy episodes that explained the over-arching conspiracy behind the show’s events. Famously, Chris Carter said he was making all that up as he went along, and it really, really shows. Nothing is ever resolved in these episodes, and what few explanations we got along the way were often contradicted by later episodes, leaving the whole thing a confusing, dispiriting mess. But the stand-alone, “monster of the week” episodes were often among the best things ever put on TV, even today, and are well worth watching.

Are you sure? The third or fourth episode is a ripoff of The Thing, so I don’t think the producers were too concerned with basing the cases on real life.

I said that we, the audience, were led to believe, in promotions for the show and interviews in magazines, that this was “real.”

I figured out partway into the first season that this was hogwash, particularly when they went with a Monster of the Week format.

Nevertheless, the promos and so forth said it was “based on true stories.” I’m assuming they meant “well, yeah, sometimes FBI agents fly out to places and can’t figure out what’s going on,” as opposed to “yeah, they see flying saucers and werewolves and stretchy men who eat livers and stuff.”

Early X-Files were really good. Then they just got plain silly.

Within the past couple months I binge-watched the entire series. I found it sporadic and random in terms of entertainment value, but I don’t regret the binge. The one thing I did gain from watching it was a greater appreciation of Breaking Bad’s Vince Gilligan and how he has become one of the stronger voices in current TV writing.

If you want to follow the same path check his credits at Vince Gilligan - IMDb under Writer.

Other than that, if it’s your cup of tea, enjoy. Otherwise, it’s not on par with other older series, IMHO.

It’s a whole lot of fun, but I’d use Wikipedia’s list and avoid the “story arch” episodes.

Some stand-alones are lame, but the effort was really there and a lot are a bunch of fun.

It’s also all in HD on Netflix now, which is neat. It looks great.

And I’m asking, are you sure? Because this part of “we, the audience” does not remember that at all. I know you want to believe, but the truth is in here and it does not agree with you:

I don’t remember it ever pretending to be real or based off truths. I remember that Leonard Nimoy show, though.

Back then we had a paper bold enough to tell the real truth.

So what if Mulder and Scully manage to raise their game in the realm of obtaining evidence? They post their authentic, can’t-miss, smoking-gun footage of the Monster of the Week on YouTube … and it gets ignored amidst the avalanche of cat videos, makeup tutorials and terrible acoustic renditions of popular songs. Or it’s mistaken for a hoax. There are plenty of people trying to perpetrate hoaxes out there; I see no reason why their footage wouldn’t be lumped in with that lot. This is how hard it would be to convince people of the truth even without, as it’s already been mentioned, a vast conspiracy with the means and the will to keep this weird stuff under wraps.

I watched X-Files from the beginning and remember no promotion that hinted the show was “real.” It was entertaining contemporary speculative fiction–with “real” explanations for some of the mysteries. Mulder & Scully made a great team & there was quite a bit of dry wit.

That first year, The Adventures of Brisco County Jr ran first. (I liked that show, too.) It was not billed as True Adentures in The Old West.

“Now, I think you might like this next show, The X-Files. I always thought it was some kind of porno, on account of the title, but turns out it’s all about two young people who don’t have sex. Now, that’s entertainment!”

-Hank Hill