My sentiments exactly. The more posts I read by pro-gun people the more I realize most are bloodthirsty and unstable hopefuls: hoping a situation arises when they get to blow someone away.
Unless the chief can point to actual data why would you consider his word more reliable than a random youtube link?
So because some people can’t properly store and use their firearms those who can should be prevented access to effective means of defense? Is this a numbers game where the only goal is to minimize deaths at all costs?
The more posts I read by anti-gun people the more I realize most are sheltered authoritarians hoping an opportunity arises to strip others of their ability to protect the well-being of both themselves and their loved ones.