I used to think this way, but as I’ve gotten older I’ve come to realise that famous nakedness is no better than non-famous nakedness, and sometimes it can be quite disappointing.
I actually have come to prefer famous, casual, almost-nakedness, like short shorts, t-shirts, bikinis, and stuff like that.
UFC, baby. My SO rented this from Netflix a while ago and he groused that I was watching it for all the same reasons. Naked, sweaty, hot men? Rolling around on the ground?
Ditto.
The first ones that popped into my mind were Ryan Reynolds and Jake Gyllenhaal. I also wouldn’t mind Sean Patrick Flanery and Norman Reedus circa 1999.
The one on the left is computer-enhanced, and the one on the right is completely fake. Your Tina Fey is completely fake as well. This is about nudity. I think most of us know how to find non-nude pics that are already out there.
BTW, Michelle has posed in a see-through dress: link Lightened for boobage: link She also showed her ass in a movie, but from so far away that you can barely see anything. For her non-nude, I prefer this: Michelle For Tina Fey: Tina
That Emma Watson one looks Photoshopped to me. Her face seems much too young for the body. Truth be told, it makes me a little uncomfortable looking at that.
Get real. Nudity isn’t allowed here and not every celebrity has done something resembling nudity. Flattering pictures are much easier to come by. Did you read my post at all? The point was to show the body of people we want to see the rest of.
Your other point is worthless also. If you know how to find non-nude pictures, you can find nude pictures, thus eliminating any requirement for people linking at all. I just did more legwork in that post than you will for your next ten. Just trying to give people a little somethin’ nice to look at without having to go hunt it down themselves.
Yeah I know, same here.
My quality of the pictures I was accepting towards the end started to slip because I had a freaking huge headache by that point and just wanted to get it finished.