Yep, they’re definitely getting pretty funky on those wrappers. I wouldn’t like them either. (Bummer; I like Maoam.) I wouldn’t cause a scene at the store, but I wouldn’t buy them.
It wouldn’t have any bearing on whether I’d purchase them, but yes, the lime is ravishing the lemon. And those cherries are being treated like the tramps they are.
No outrage here but what the hell is going on with those wrappers?
What does the candy company explain it away as?
Is he really supposed to be humping the fruit?
I’ve seen this candy on pages before this for the exact reason stated. I have to ask why his child would associate it with sex. Did daddy and mommy do something like that in front of the minors?
The candy company is not portraying humping fruit as far as they are concerned.
I think the first time this was brought to my attention it was a page about how some people tend to see sex objects in daily items.
My children are all grown up, but if a five-year-old asked me what the fruit were doing I’d just say they were kissing or cuddling. The fruit don’t seem to have any genitalia, let along be doing anything with them, so I only think somebody with a really dirty mind would think they are “having sex”. But, as I think D.H. Lawrence once observed, it’s the people with dirty minds who want the censorship.