Feigenbaum Constants

I think I must have a mental block about the Feigenbaum constants. I’ve tried but just can’t seem to get what they’re supposed to be reflecting. In particular, I don’t understand how they relate to the so-called bifurcation diagram (AKA logistic map).

So let me ask, do either of the constants relate to the (relative) distance between successive bifurcations in the map (as depicted in the above link)? Or, perhaps, they play a role in the (relative) distance between the white areas (i.e. the white vertical areas seen in the link)? Any help, especially at an “intuitive level”, would be hugely appreciated.

Thanks!

One bifurcated bump!

Both of the Feigenbaum constants (delta and alpha) relate to the bifurcation approach to chaos: that is, they talk about the left part of the logistic-map image you linked to (r<3.57 or so). This image is a graph of the locations of stable orbit points (on the vertical axis) versus a parameter r. That is, choose the logistic parameter r and some arbitrary initial condition x0; apply the logistic map for long enough that it settles into a stable orbit; and plot the positions (r,x1),…,(r,xn) for the points (x1,…,xn) in the stable orbit. Then increment r and continue. (For a very simple algorithm you might, e.g., just apply the map a hundred times to let the transients die out, and then plot the next hundred points.)

In the period-doubling (bifurcation) approach to chaos you initially see a single stable point (i.e., f(x)=x); then as the parameter is varied you get a period-two orbit (f(x1)=x2, f(x2)=x1), a period-4 orbit, and so on. Eventually (r>~3.57 in the logistic map) you lose all periodicity and get a fully chaotic map; the Feigenbaum constants don’t talk about that.

In the logistic-map image, for r<3 there is a single stable point of the map (which is the single point in the vertical slice at a given r<3). At r>3 the formerly-stable point becomes unstable, and there is now a stable period-two orbit (the two points in a slice for 3<r<~3.45). At r~3.45 this period-two orbit becomes unstable, and there’s now a stable orbit of period 4, until r~3.54; and so on. The limit of the ratio between these “onsets of instability” is delta; so the first term in the sequence whose limit is delta is roughly (3.45-3.0)/(3.54-3.45).

The other constant, alpha, relates the height of one of these forks to the height of one of its “children”. The first fork has “tines” (the points where the period-two orbit becomes unstable) at r~3.45, x~0.45 and x~0.85, so its height is 0.85-0.45~0.4. Its wider child has tines at r~3.54, x~0.37 and x~0.53. So we have a ratio (0.85-0.45)/(0.53-0.37), as the first element in the sequence whose limit is alpha.

For the white regions at r>~3.57 (“islands of stability”) you can see the same bifurcations occurring; these are regions where there’s a brief return to finite-length periodic orbits before the chaos returns. You can compute delta and alpha for just these regions, and the universality of the constants implies that they should be the same.

Thank you so much.

I just saw your response now so haven’t even begun to think about it. I hope when I’m done (may be in a day or so 'cause I’m busy with other stuff just now), you’ll be patient enough to answer a question or two.

Thanks again!