http://www.straightdope.com/columns/021025.html
okay, was it just me or was the drawing with that really really weird?
most of all the fact it looks like the cecil turkey has smelly feet… plus the fact hes spitting it out of his mouth like that… not to mention the fact that the machine has a face…
that was a question that gave us some new and interesting insight into mr cecil!
Funny, I’ve noticed a lot of the Sig drawings to be pretty wierd but I almost started a thread on this one myself. Often the drawings have lots of hidden little goodies in the background.
I think this also may be the first Slug Signorino depiction of Mrs. Adams. She seems…um…satisfied.
And her breasts aren’t triangular, like most of Slug’s drawings of women.
That’s not smelly feet, you silly owl, that’s “Sig,” the beginning of Slug’s signature. And Cecil is rather obviously not spitting it out, he’s stripping it off from his beak; apparently, that’s how he pleasured the provider of the sample. Finally, I work in a laboratory, and I assure you that all sexual-secretion analyzers have faces; that’s just how it is (no, really).
Huh. Based on the “identafluid” label, I assumed that the machine had first analyzed the spooje around the berobed chiquita’s feet, and was now proceeding to the character of the snot being blown from Cecilbird’s beak. I never would have concluded that the stream had been sucked from the lady’s orifice and then retransferred beakily to the machine.
I’m just amused that the “Comments on Cecil’s Columns” link says underneath:
Say what you really think. Please, don’t gush.
But I thought gushing was precisely what we were talking about here.
I was actually surprised that both the questionner and Cecil claimed to have been doused in female ejaculate at some point. Neither I nor any of my friends have experienced a female cumshot. I always thought it was pretty rare, not more than 10% of women.
In the er, uh, interest of science, I contribute that it occurred in 0 out of 14 samples.
So your ten percent, Adam sounds believable.
(emphasis added)
Is Cecil drawing a conclusion from a sample size of just one individual, or were multiple women sampled for this particular finding?
I had noted that drawing, as well, and the putative Mrs. Adams does, in fact, look well-pleased with her lot in life. On the other hand, we have Cecil’s rather uncharacteristic comment that he would rather not go into details. I mean, since when does Cecil hold back on details? I sincerely hope that his reluctance is not traceable to any current difficulties in the romance department.
lmfao…i was thinking the same thing…