How slick are your powers of observation?
12/16 here…I demand a recount!
14/16 
I got fooled by the blond who looked like she was having something unpleasant done to her anal, and the one on the upper right who just looks like a girl.
11/16. You’d think that as a woman I’d be able to tell a little better than that.
14/16, I missed the bottom two
13 of 16.
12/16
3 of them I thought were women but were actually men, and one of them was a woman but I thought she was a man.
13/16
But those wrong 3 will worry me next time I’m on a date!
8/16. I’m a pushover. 
13/16
Personally, I find the whole thing offensive. As far as I can tell, all of them are female; none of them are men. The author is making the double error of assuming that all transgenders are “shemales” and that shemales are “men”. Neither statement is true. This site spreads ignorance, rather than combating it.
Ok, just how did y’all get a score? I only saw a reset button. (And I tried Netscape, Mozilla and IE5)
Which is why I posted it (like the Mueller Invitational thread by Jack Batty) in MPSIMS.
Apologies if anyone was offended though…
Nevermind, I retried it in IE and it worked.
6/16
Given that I’m not overly fond of the premise myself, I don’t mind that score at all.
9/16
Yikes!!! I’ll never trust another woman unless she shows me the goods (all of them)!!! 
Hmm, 14 out of 16. I think Jerry Springer has had better ones than that… my hit rate on those episodes were much lower.
Kelly, “The author is making the double error of assuming that all transgenders are ‘shemales’ and that shemales are ‘men’. Neither statement is true. This site spreads ignorance, rather than combating it.” Eh. I think you are making the same mistake in the other direction. There are certianly a lot of men who simply dress up like women. We cannot tell which are which by inspection, so there is really no way we can avoid being ignorant here. But if you find it offensive, well, nothing to argue about that (not saying I do, just syaing: what can I say?).
Heh, I took it a second time and corrected one of my errors, but the blond who looks like she’s getting it doggie fooled me again. Maybe I should ask her out on a date.
I find this post odd, considering that the same poster posted the following in this thread
Once again–very odd. Color me 
Quix
Men who “simply dress up like women” are not shemales. The term shemale is derogatory and refers to a preoperative transsexual who participates in either prostitution or pornography. The term is on a par with “whore” and is, standing along, very offensive. Using the term “shemale” to refer generically to transgenders is extremely offensive and is akin to calling all women “bitches”.
See what I mean about spreading ignorance?
Oh, and quixotic: my use of “retard” in that other thread was intended to be deliberately offensive. Do not confuse rhetorical purpose with casual insult.
13/16.
For some reason, I can usually tell by the eyes. I can’t describe it, but women’s eyes are different.
15/16. I beat alla y’all so far.
I shudder to think of the implications, Geobabe.