My previous post, Terr, was to dispute the assertion that the parents said the voice didn’t belong to their son. According to them they never said that. Take it or leave it. I’m assuming you’ll leave it.
On the other hand, linking to pictures of some kid in a t-shirt has me totally convinced. Does that mean we can dismiss everyone who dislikes Obama because of “re-nig” stickers?
The father made that statement to the police - that it wasn’t his son’s voice. That’s what the police reported. I am sure the police recorded that statement at some point and have the father’s signature on it - that’s standard police procedure. What the father says weeks after in the middle of national controversy is another matter.
It’s overbroad, offensive, inflammatory, and demagogic. It characterizes everyone who is outraged by the killing of an unarmed youth as enjoying a kind of sexual pleasure (orgasm) in what might reasonably considered justifiable anger. And, I might add, it sounds pretty racist.
Thank you for your opinion.
So you simply aren’t reading anything that people are posting?
Why should anyone listen to what you’re saying when you refuse to address what has been presented?
don’t feed him.
his basic stance is that we should believe the cops, so much so that we can now ignore eyewitness testimony if the cops say it conflicts with that their report. never mind the fact the witnesses say the cops REFUSED to take their FULL statement and only wrote down the parts that corroborated Zim’s bits–
the fundamental clause he’s basing his argument on is that the cops were beyond reproach and what they say is the way it i was. but when you pin him down, he refuses to admit he even believes the cops did a good job.
classic. he’ll bait you and demand details to support your cause, yet won’t even express his basic beliefs on the subject.
this is a waste of everyone’s time.
I think business representatives in Florida are now being confronted by citizens who seem to justify their altercations with the Stand the Ground law. I’m thinking about the Doordash driver who was raped this week and the Instacart driver who was confronted by the resident where the resident shot the Instacart driver’s car and the resident’s foot got injured.
I could see how Doordash and Instacart could maybe potentially sue Florida in federal court over the Stand Your Ground law. But I don’t have a JD and don’t know about law much at all.
It’s weird how all of the 'Stand Your Ground or Duty to Retreat into Home laws are different from my personal circumstance. I’ve been randomly confronted by crazily aggressive people at work and where I live at times. Even though I’ve always owned property and worked at a job where I’m legally responsible for my subordinates, my first thought is always to leave, to move like a squirrel that ate some meth.