Ignorance fought. Thank you.
Even if Martin threw some punches there’s documented evidence he was scared by Zimmerman’s creepy threatening stalking through the night. It doesn’t fucking matter if Zimmerman was punched. He was a clear threat to Martin.
Some creep stalks you through the night despite your attempts to get away, and approaches you with a gun, ignoring your questions, wouldn’t you feel threatened?
Bottom line, even if Martin beat the crap out of Zimmerman he was justified in self defense.
Zimmerman had zero right to murder a child trying to defend himself.
Martin was suspended for having trace amounts of weed. Zimmerman is the gun toting thug with a history of police violence and random/racist harassment/shootings. I’d trust a pot smoker over a gun smoker any day of the fucking week.
At least one of those photos being send around are of a different kid.
That said, who gives a shit? I also don’t care if there are pictures of George Zimmerman slinging gang signs at a camera. Young men and teenagers put on a show for the camera, big deal.
What the two did immediately prior to the incident could matter.
Martin was suspended because he was found with an empty baggie in his backpack.
I’m shocked! Shocked! A 17-year-old who smoked pot!
I certainly didn’t know anyone who smoked pot in high school!
Sarcasm aside, in my experience not only is experimenting with pot fairly normal, I’ve never seen any compelling evidence linking pot and violence. If anything, just the opposite is true.
I didn’t see anyone drawing any conclusions from the fact that he might have smoked pot. I suppose you could draw some from the allegation that he was selling it, per jtgain’s source, if it were true.
“John”. And he certainly gave his name to the police when he gave them the testimony. I can see how due to the black ragegasm about this he would not want his name publicly known.
But of course. It wouldn’t be advantageous in any way for the father to tell the truth now that the black rage campaign is in full swing.
Your hood is showing.
[sips tea]The lads and I were at the country club yesterday, having a conversation about this, “black ragism” that has infused the hoi polloi these days. [/sips tea]
Dreadful business, that.
[MODERATING]
This isn’t the Pit. Please bear that in mind. This is not a forum for personal insults, trolling, or race baiting. I’m not singling anyone out but things are on the verge.
Thanks,
RickJay
Moderator
I will single some people out. Terr and dontbesojumpy, do not accuse any other poster of trolling in any forum except The BBQ Pit. Period, no exceptions.
“Black rageism”?:dubious:
Anyway I think it’s amusing that after demanding that DNJ “name them” Terr still won’t admit he can’t “name” the witness who confirms his world view.
“Ragegasm”. Of this kind. And yes, I named the witness.
In addition to being offensively racist, this comment is jaw-droppingly stupid.
You didn’t “name” the witness, because the news report specifically didn’t say what his full name was.
Again, it’s quite hysterical how Terr refuses to admit that he can’t do what he repeatedly demanded that DNJ do.
The media only knows the pseudonym under which the witness presented himself to the media. But the witness was interrogated by the police, who have his full name.
And yes, as I said, due to the widespread black ragegasm, of whch this is just an example, it is quite understandable that the witness doesn’t want to reveal his full name to the media.
Using that word repeatedly is not helping your case.
It’s an accurate description. The “Pussy Ass Cracker” tshirts featuring Zimmerman. The call by Black Panthers for “5000 black men” to commit a kidnapping (for which they can get up to life in prison in Florida). It’s an accurate description.