Jois:
(It occasionally looks more like Jackson Pollock.)
I am not going to produce what I attempted. There are substantial sections (e.g., most of Deuteronomy) which are attributed to a single author and in looking over my schematic, I figured that I could type in the more fragmented parts with simply a bit more effort.
However, This is what I came up with for simply the first 15 chapters of Genesis:
P: Gn 1:1 - 2:4a
J: Gn 2:4b - 4:26
P: Gn 5:1 - 5:28
J: Gn 5:29
P: Gn 5:30 - 5:32
J: Gn 6:1 - 6:8
P: Gn 6:9 - 6:22
J: Gn 7:1 - 7:5
P: Gn 7:6 -
J: Gn 7:7 - 7:10
P: Gn 7:11
J: Gn 7:12
P: Gn 7:13 - 7:16a
J: Gn 7:16b
P: Gn 7:17a
J: Gn 7:17b
P: Gn 7:18 - 7:21
J: Gn 7:22 - 7:23
P: Gn 7:24 - 8:2a
J: Gn 8:2b - 8:3a
P: Gn 8:3b - 8:5
J: Gn 8:6 - 8:12
P: Gn 8:13a
J: Gn 8:13b
P: Gn 8:14 - 8:19
J: Gn 8:20 - 8:22
P: Gn 9:1 - 9:17
J: Gn 9:18 - 9:27
P: Gn 9:28 - 10:7
J: Gn 10:8 - 10:19
P: Gn 10:20
J: Gn 10:21
P: Gn 10:22 - 10:23
J: Gn 10:24 - 10:30
P: Gn 10:31 - 10:32
J: Gn 11:1 - 11:9
P: Gn 11:10 - 11:27
J: Gn 11:28 - 11:30
P: Gn 11:31 - 11:32
J: Gn 12:1 - 12:4a
P: Gn 12:4b - 12:5
J: Gn 12:6 - 13:5
P: Gn 13:6
J: Gn 13:7 - 13:11a
P: Gn 13:11b - 13:12a
J: Gn 13:12b - 13:18
*: Gn 14:1 - 14:24 (special insertion of older material)
E/J: Gn 15:1 - 15:26 (mixed reviews as to E or J as the source)
I’m afraid that I do not have the energy to complete even Genesis, much less the remaining five books.
I am continuing to look for an on-line presentation of this material. Unfortunately, 95% of the sites that address the issue are fundy cranks that are attacking this literary reconstruction.
([rant]The “fundy crank” comment refers to the specific sites I have found. I have no problem with or disdain for a Christian or Jew who takes the position that the Mosaic authorship is established in tradition and that any discrepancies that are found are simply misperceptions or minor adjustments to the text that we cannot understand at this distant remove. I do not agree with that position, but the position may be valid. My problem with the “fundy cranks” is that every one of them claims that the “higher criticism” approach is merely an attempt to remove God and Divine Revelation from the bible, perpetrated by unbelievers. That calumny is simply not true. If you run the list of names in the citation that Moriah provided, you cannot find an unbeliever among them. These were men who truly believed that they were studying the Word of God, but discovered questions in it regarding how it came to be organized in the way that we find it, today.[/rant])
Until I can find an actual on-line schema, you can try the Encyclopædia Britannica:
http://www.britannica.com/bcom/eb/article/4/0,5716,119704+1,00.html
(If the link fails, search for “pentateuch” or search for “biblical literature” then select “Old Testament Literature” from the index on that article.)
The EB’s article is fairly detailed while remaining (mostly) clear and it does present a broader outline of the sources and applications of J, E, P, and D (plus H!).
My schematic is found in The Men and the Message of the Old Testament by Peter F. Ellis.
The resource I rely on most heavily is Introduction to the Old Testament by Otto Eissfeldt.
The resource that I have seen most frequently referenced by other people is The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, Metzger, Bruce M. ed.
The source that Moriah posted is a pretty good synopsis of the road we took to get to our current understanding. (As any attempt to sketch a complex subject, briefly, it may fail to give enough detail in some areas while assuming too much knowledge on the part of the reader on the other–do you want it brief or complete? There is no brief and complete.)
I am going to continue to try to find an online schematic of the JEPD outline. I don’t know how much luck I will have.
Tom~