I will include my response to Rysto here for posterity:
I would encourage all players to consider that the other players ARE thinking about their actions. In Cecil Pond I was the whistleblower on the masons outing themselves. I thought about the pros and cons for quite a while before pointing that out thank-you-very-much.
- The Mason voting spree was obvious. That scum were lazy is incidental.
- I was in the set of possible masons. In other words, I knew that if there was another mason in the isolated set, there was also a non-mason (me). Pretending to be ‘mad’ at being outed was a play at protecting the last mason.
Just because things work out a certain way doesn’t mean people aren’t being careful and thoughtful of their actions.
On the balance Rysto’s comments boil down to “think about your actions” which is always true.
Trying to explain when Town should reveal information and when they shouldn’t is a tricky venture. There is no “rule” or easy guide. It’s too easy to point out after the fact what someone should have done. Everyone has to play with the information and situation at hand and just do their best. Sometimes hiding information is best; sometimes revealing it is best; sometimes there is hidden information that flips what is best.