[QUOTE=Gadarene]
What do you want me to say, tirial? You got the result you wanted regardless. How would it have changed if I had done random.org on Saturday following the tie vote and your name had come up?
I’m sorry. Bad, bad me. Incompetence doesn’t equal bias.
(By the way, I’ve clearly learned my lesson about putting information, however cryptic, into the forbidden thread. But I will say that the last Day or so has, to a careful observer, been interesting to watch for reasons beyond the obvious ones.)
[/QUOTE]
No, but incompetance can have the same effect as bias.
What I object to is the town losing a 50% chance of still having a Doctor block tonight. If my name had come up in random that’s one thing. To have the GM deliberately give the town more time purely to destroy the tie, is insulting.
Frankly Gad, who on earth do you think you are to ignore the players’ vote[Sup]1[/Sup]? You don’t think anyone would like a tie? Well, maybe Cookies did when she voted to create it. Maybe I’d played my a*** off to create it. Maybe nesta had a reason not to break it. Maybe Hal and Diggit weren’t going to unvote me under any circumstances, so the only way for it to be broken is for me to get lynched - sorry to point out the bleeding obvious, but you do seem to have completely overlooked this rather important point.
I told you when I found out about Idle that I was seriously annoyed with both of you, but a last minute rules change is so far beyond that, that its not even funny.
[Sup]1[/Sup](Not even refs using the red-pen-rule pull this one. Sorry. )