Milum has started this thread in GD, with the stated purpose of carrying on the “good discussion” from this thread. The topic? Why liberals hate Fox News. Milum has some ideas. I have chosen some of the more pugnacious examples and reproduced them below:
“Good discussion” my ass, Milum. This thread is shit. And the only reason you opened it was to stir up trouble. This is not a great debate. This is not a great anything. It’s shit. A steaming pile of useless, mindless, pointless shit. How do I know? Well, if you were serious about debating this, you wouldn’t have needed two posters to ask you to take a serious position on the topic. Here’s the final sentance from the “serious” proposition:
Are you fucking kidding me? Self-selected elite? Grand march towards socialism? What the hell are you smoking? When challanged on a point which appears to be presented with at least some amount of seriousness ("[A] shift in [the American people’s] prime source of information from traditional news to FOX…"), Milum responds by adding this challenge to a post which is no more than a summary of the thread up to that point, concluded with this zinger:
Poor baby. Can I help you with that cross, dipshit? Milum also gives a “response” to Soup_du_jour in the same post:
Soup’s post won’t be making any best-of threads anytime soon. But at least he gives a reason for hating Fox News. Which is what the OP asked for. But instead of responding to someone who answered the fucking question in his own damn OP, Milum dismisses the post with a sarcastic remark.
Finally, Chefguy and 'possum stalker arrive to inject some sense into this poor excuse for a debate:
You’re not doing yourself any favors with this one, Milum. What compelled you to post such a thread?