I guess that assumes that:
A) You’re a guy
and
B) You’re the one calling the shots once you’re in the room.
(B) is where I’m going with the “your own terms”, which could probably have been said better. A woman, alone in a room with a guy that she doesn’t know, doing pretty much what he wants, which might not necessarily be what she’d prefer to be doing at the time.
Let’s say - for example - you take $100 from a woman to go into a hotel room with her and have sex. Ok, goodie, right?
Now let’s say once you’re there, she, being bigger and stronger than you, decides she wants something clearly NOT on your list of “fun things to do during sex”. You say no, she says yes, and reminds you, perhaps by force who is the customer and who is the hooker here.
Let’s assume for the sake or argument, that you actually do get paid instead of being, oh I don’t know…robbed or beaten?
Granted, from a men’s POV, getting paid to have sex sounds like a sweet American Gigolo kind of gig.
All I’m saying is that for the risk, the uncertainty, the probably good deal of time that would have to go into actually being IN the business, when it comes down to it, $700 a week is pretty small time, and sure as hell wouldn’t be worth it if you could do something that didn’t entail all those problems, not to mention that like it or not, it can still get you busted.