Who says we have to give a first time poster & someone who can’t express themselves properly (yet comes here to complain about the board) that opportunity? You? Fine, your circus, your monkey… translate it.
No, its an indication that they can’t express themselves properly or effectively in the written language of English. Until they can, what they write is indistinguishable from nonsense.
I vote we start a new forum for playing Thread Games about Freely Ridiculing People involved in Current Events.
For me, I always think of the “Biggus Dickus” scene in Monty Python’s Life of Brian, since that’s the only place I’ve ever encountered that word. Then I start hearing everything I read in Pontius Pilate’s voice – which can be good or bad, depending on the circumstances.
That was fun! How is it done? Like, Javascript, or…? Anyway, fun!
The results are also fun! This is the sharpest collection of utter crap since Crank.Net. (I miss Crank.Net! It was such a jolly place to go for horseshit like ebuc76’s free-form, zero-content, stream-of-consciousness concept salad.)
I agree. I don’t know what crime he’s supposed to have committed, but with a name like Ridicule Forum, he’s suffered enough. Set the poor bastard free.
ecub is cube backwards. Maybe the Time Cube guy is on a new crusade?
Time Cube guy said (for pages and pages) that anybody who disagreed with him were evil liars. That was before he finally got to his point. ecub67 seems to think this is the proper way of selling his philosophy.
I know little about holistic science, but I am given to think that it advocates understanding a system as a whole rather than concentrating on its component parts. ecub67 wants to extend this to the whole universe, which is why he spells it “wholistic.” Moreover, he says our universe has to be finite, or we’d never be able to understand it holistically. Anybody who disagrees is supporting/encouraging unnecessary physic slapping of others in any ridiculistic manner that tickles their cruel intentions. “Evil liars” for short.
Does he understand what bias is? Does he understand that science uses empiricism to avoid bias? Maybe he wants to be the next Newton or Einstein, who stumbles across the unknown scientific principle that all the sudden changes everything. Those individuals still needed help to get their ideas across, and they didn’t get it with pre-emptive scoffing. Or with multicolored fonts.
Starting your incoherent, contextless posts without, at least, a fucking color key would get you a long way for starters.
Also, hey, bring some goddamn context to whatever the fuck you’re rambling on about before you start slathering on the retarded, repetitious, hubris, arrogance and intellectual superiority with a putty knife.
Here’s a clue, dickwad, you’re not as smart as you think you are, so when you can manage to stop sucking your own dick, maybe we can have a real discussion on physics and philosophy.