naita If I can be so bold, I’ll try to add some info while Dex greases the wheels so that the SDMB train keeps running. <grin>
Barry Popik, who is usually referred to on these boards and elsewhere as an “indefatigable researcher,” offers a cite from 1828(which pre-dates Dex’ original date, but hey, Dex writes well and WE find dates!) which he posted to the American Dialectic Society List. It is as follows:
THE COOK AND HOUSEWIFE'S MANUAL
by Mrs. Margaret Dods
The Third Edition
Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, and Bell and Bradfute
1828
"Pg. 220: The French fry sliced potatoes in goose-dripping, (Pg. 221–ed.) which has a very high relish; and before serving, drain them on a towel before the fire.
(FWIW for “french fried potatoes”–ed.)
This is certainly one of the earlier cites of a method of cooking potatoes which came from the French(or Belgians, if you want some controversy).
It is almost certainly where the modern “french fry” originates.
I’m afraid that the term “french fry” to indicate what is known today as the long, slender multi-quartered potato which is then deep fried, appears about 1915 or so, the way the MW says.
Now, about “to french.” [no, not the kiss, you perverts].
Dex says the OED cites that manner of “whatever” from 1895. It does. But it doesn’t mean what you think it means(to quote Mandy Patinkin?).
Here’s the cite: 1895 Standard Dict., French v. To prepare, as a chop, by partially cutting the meat from the shank and leaving bare the bone so as to fit it for convenient handling
How’s that for “bustin’ your chops?”
I’m off now to fix dinner for my kids, who were home sick today. I’ll try to find some more info for you tonight.