And I’m not out $2K because I have to keep chasing the dragon.
Note: bragging about comped rooms doesn’t mean anything if you’re just staying at the casino and losing more money. I can get a “comped room” at my own house. Unless you don’t have a place of your own and only rely on the kindness of casinos.
Some of you all are looking at this from a pilot’s perspective. You need to get into the weeds. Fancy math isn’t needed. Get out and play and get the feel.
With me, it’s “trial and error”. There are dozens of games that can be “AP’d”. Deciding at which point a game is +EV depends entirely on the specific game title and which casino it’s located.
Let’s use the Green Machine Bingo for example. Let’s say I’m betting $1 and the four balls add up $5, no free space. I’ll play that about 10 times (or watch someone else), if I win more money than I put into the machine about 7 or 8 times, I’ll consider it APable. But that isn’t APable. But I found out that betting $1 with the balls adding up to $10 is APable, especially with a free space. Again using a sample of 10 tries.
When I lost my ass Friday night, that was a game I ran NO trials and errors. My first time I ever played it. Whenever I went about $300 deep, I let my emotions get the best of me and went crazy. I was already in a bad mood that night. Was I in my right mind, I should’ve experimented with lower bets and watched other people play.
No, this is the exact fallacy the OP is falling to. That is not a “strategy”. It is a way that you can sometimes walk out of a casino with more money than you when you walked in. But you are still more likely to walk out with $0.
The time you walked away after hitting 33 at roulette - was that the only time you’ve ever gambled? How much did you lose other times? If you repeated that strategy tomorrow, would you expect to come out ahead or behind?
Are you saying that I’m pouring THOUSANDS of dollars per week to get comped rooms? Man, if I were in that bracket of having THOUSANDS of dollars per week to donate to the casino…I would never be fucking around in casinos in the first place. Gambling just to be gambling is stupid and boring. If I want to risk my money I would play the stock market. If I wanted to game, I would get a damn playstation.
Would you be willing to share the spreadsheets where you’ve tracked the odds and winnings under these different conditions? I assume you must have data to feel this confident, not just a “gut feel” based on imperfect memory and confirmation bias.
If they did factor them in, they might put something on the slot machine that looks like it’s about to cash out, to appeal to wannabe vultures, but actually moves much slower than the vultures anticipate, preying on the vultures’ impulsivity and contempt for mathematical analysis. If they did factor in advantage play, I bet they could easily get a couple grand out of the advantage player.
You’re thinking one step ahead of them. They’re thinking three steps ahead of you.
For you, it’s a side hustle. For them, it’s a multi-billion-dollar industry that employs brilliant mathematicians and psychologists.
Of course they factor in advantage play. Why would they leave your money on the table? Your OP is a perfect story about how they’ve factored it in.
If I were operating under confirmation bias. Reality would’ve hit me a looooooong time ago. Empty wallets. Car repossessions. Pay day loans. Selling gold chains at train stops. “Busking” (pretending to play the violin but along with a stereo) in Walmart parking lots. Stealing change from my daughter’s piggy bank (yeah some dude did that). Rice and beans. Selling jars of my flatulence on Only Fans.
The non-AP winning streaks only last so long.
Got dammit, no wonder employers don’t like to hire people straight out of college. Learning theories will only take you so far. There needs to be practice and experience. This thread would not have 132 replies had some people ever experimented with these games. There would be no debate.
I consider a strategy as distinct from a system. For me strategy at blackjack is playing the best system and money management whereas my system is to press a winning bet twice and take it all down at once then start over.
In roulette my strategy was either win big or lose $50 and play for a short-term win whereas a system (which I don’t play) would be the Martingale or the Fibonacci system or that new one of covering high/red/3rd colum with proportional bets. I showed that mathematically it doesn’t create any difference just more volatility.
I think I’m done with this thread. It is like talking to a CTer. Saying this in all seriousness, the OP needs help that we cannot provide and when I see
I’m typically not a take a chance person. I would never play those. I don’t play carnival games either. No roulette, no blackjack (that can be APed too, but I don’t have the patience), no baccarat, no lotto. Lotto is yet another game that can be APed, but I don’t have to bankroll and I don’t want to Feds knocking on my door. Before someone calls “bullshit”, here’s a link to a story on a couple who beat the Michigan lotto. How A Couple Won $26 Million Using A Lottery Loophole They Found In Minutes (msn.com)
Here’s some more interesting stuff. This stuff isn’t “AP”, but these folks were able to exploit games for their benefit. Don’t try these at home, kids. You’ll like go to jail or something huh huh huh. Just wanted to demonstrate that games can have flaws in their design. They’re designed by human beings, humans make mistakes.