We were just thinking the same thing of you.
It must be interesting when FXMastermind get’s his final grades…
Test Scores:
65
82
44
63
58
Oooh, I got a B!
Oh please. You lie!
And you’re daft, mad, cracked, loony, insane, doltish, unbalanced, and warped.
And while we’re on the subject, you’re a rotten cook, as well.
Let me guess, he failed at the iron chef with his overcooked and crummy processed quotes uh? 
Congratulations, you’ve managed to convince me that you’re right! Especially with that last part there, which I overlooked in my extensive FXMastermind research of “seeing colossal threads that are 33+% FXMastermind and not noticing him anywhere else.” Yes, now I figure there is a 0% chance of you being a shill.
So instead of being regular dumb and being paid to act extra dumb, I guess you’re just extra dumb in the first place. Good luck with that!
Protip: I still don’t give a fuck. About your lame flames, your opinions, your stupid insults, and especially your penchant for talking about your delusions, rather than any science, or about Fukushima.
Protip? Are you living in 2002?
Fukushima tuna safe to eat – study | Environment | The Guardian
http://www.infowars.com/california-tuna-have-high-levels-of-radioactive-cesium/
Forbes say nothing to worry about.
Now here’s a realistic site about radiation in sea life
Hahah
oh Fukushima, the disaster that never stops giving
One of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn’t belong.
I tried to read the story in that link, but it was cut off at the end. It said…
By what?
ETA: One also notes the solecism “thirty times less,” a sloppy way of putting it. This is generally interpreted to mean “one thirtieth the amount.” Newswriters ought to swear off this clumsy construction.
Probably a banana. Or maybe uranium. Those are both used to compare to radioactive cesium 134 and 137.
Which is one of those clever little scientific frauds people use to try and play down any risk from radiation from reactor meltdowns, melt through and a constant leaking into the Pacific ocean. They compare cesium, which emits gamma rays, to natural radioactive substances. Neither of which radiate gamma.
It’s just one of the many ways to say, “Move along folks, nothing to see here”.
So, like I said, it’s probably Potassium (40K) they are ‘comparing’ with.
Yeah, they should be totally raising a stink about this fish that is in no way more dangerous to anyone than any other tuna. Damn the man for totally burying this vital information! Damn him!
And once again, it’s somehow impossible to actually fucking measure what is in the steam. Like, if there is radiation leaking into the atmosphere.
They are like, “What could it be?”. Just like when it was steaming away for weeks after the explosion that blew the reactor containment building to a mangled wreck.
Dump water on it. That seems to be the last resort when reactor goes tits up.
Oh, and happy new year.
Looks like the thread title is spot on.
How many people have died due to Fukushima? Has it passed the death toll of a single oil tanker explosion that killed 47?
Heck, this thread must have a pretty high death toll by now.