Long about March 28, I had a consultation with an orthopedic surgeon whose practice is part of Duke University Medical Center. His office took x-rays. Then they realized they x-rayed my foot instead of my ankle and took the correct x-rays. I talked to the doc, decided surgery wasn’t worth it, and went on my way.
In April I got a bill with three separate x-rays charged on it, one labeled “ankle,” and two labeled “foot.” I called and talked to Evan, who promised to send it to the Medical Auditor, who would review it and then send it to the Charge Correction Team. This process would take several weeks.
Today I got the same bill again. I called Billing at 2:15 and talked to Connie, who put me on hold and called some unnamed people at the doctor’s office. She came back and told me since the x-ray of my ankle included 3 views, the bill was correct. Given the wording of the bill, that didn’t make sense, so I asked for them to send a letter describing exactly what the bill meant, and she told me she couldn’t do that - I’d have to contact the doctor’s office.
At that point, I was half ready to just let them try to collect, but I didn’t want them to trash my credit, and if I was just not going to pay I wanted to send them a written request for an explanation of the bill, so I decided to call the doctor’s office.
2:45 - Attempt 1: Told I should contact Billing. When I explained they sent me here, I was put on hold to be connected with the doctor’s assistant, stuck in hold limbo for ages, hung up to try again.
Attempt 2: cross examined about who I talked to the first time, put through to Gelonda, who said 3 views shouldn’t be three separate charges. She did some searching to figure out who I should talk to, and finally gave me Sandra’s number, saying, “I *hope *this is the right number.”
3:00 - Called Sandra. She hunted around a bit and told me Gail would call me back.
3:07 - Called my insurance company to let them know what’s going on. They tell me in their records, the thing marked “ankle” was the fee for the radiologist, and the things marked “foot” were two views of my ankle (no info on where the third view disappeared to). Because when you want to charge for a radiologist’s consultation, it makes sense to call him an “ankle,” I suppose, and when you x-ray an ankle, it’s obvious you should refer to it as “foot.”
3:15 - Instead of Gail, Diana called me back. By this time I was about ready to just send them a nastygram and pursue damages under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, but Diana opened with, “I hear you’re getting the runaround.” And behold, she was competent, and had access to the records and the actual x-rays, and she determined that one charge was for the left ankle, and the two “foot” charges were for the mistaken x-rays of both my feet (I didn’t even remember they’d done both!). I was almost shocked when she said she’d issue a credit for the two foot x-rays.
Now, it’s no Verizon-charges-.02cents conversation, but it was pretty annoying. And pointless - what I suspected and told them about in April was exactly what happened!
:smack: