Could the universe have been designed by an intelligent entity?
The answer to the above question is not definately yes, and it isn’t definately no. Instead we are forced to concede to a maybe if we are going to be intellectually honest. The fact that this has not been ruled out should be presented to students.
Surpringly (to most of the Southern Baptists I went to high school with anyway) the existence of evolution does not rule out intelligent design. Equally, the possibility of intelligent design does not mean that Christianity (or any other religion) is on the right track. It is entirely possiblie that the universe was designed by an intelligent being, and that all religions of the world are false. It is possible (perhaps even likely) that such a creator would never communicate with us. It is also possible that such a creator (were it to exist) would communicate with us. Since none of these things can be ruled out, an objective discussion of the nature of reality should allow for these posssiblities.
What is important is that the children learn how to ask questions in a way that leads them to answers which are based in truth and knowledge (i.e. the scientific method). If they are taught to dismiss out of hand the potential for a creator they are not living up to the method. They need to be objective.
Then they need to learn to separate and recognize the difference between evidence and faith. One is grounded in fact and the other in the absence of fact. Evidence can get you things like the internet and space shuttles, and faith can get you nothing tangible and is based in heresay. The kids need to explore both. They need to find what facts, the pursuit of knowledge, and the scientific method can teach them. They also need to learn where the limits of science are. Then when they grow up they can try to push those limits.
They may turn to faith to answer those questions science hasn’t answered yet, but they should know that beliefs based in no evidence are not equal to those based in testable data. Just because there is not yet enough evidence to disprove something (creationism), does not mean that evidence which suggests something else (no creator) should be abandoned. Science is cumulative and only by standing on the shoulders of giants can we see as far as we can these days. Answers come, but it takes time.
The children need to be taught of the possibilities, the methods, and the way to make conclusions. To leave out part of this (namely the possibilities) is to go against what we are trying to teach them in the first place. Be objective, look for evidence, and revise your best guess based on evidence. Then test your best guess in a way which is repeatable. If they have decided the answer before they go looking for evidence then they are not being scientific, whether they are sure of a creator or sure of no creator.
If it’s a scientific attitude we want from them, then creationism should be discussed. What would we expect from a universe which was designed? What should we expect from a universe which was not designed? How does the universe compare to these expectations when tested? This is the line of thought that they should be exposed too. If we teach them that the universe wasn’t created when we don’t really know, we are just being hypocritical.
DaLovin’ Dj