Let’s see how close we can keep the views to the actual post count of this thread. I bet it will deviate fairly quickly but those people are just spoil sports and we don’t love them anymore anyway. 
HUGS!
Sqrl
I tried not to open it. I really did. I said to myself, “Self, don’t play SqrlCub’s game. Don’t get drawn in. Let his post sink into oblivion.”
But I am weak. :: hangs head in shame ::
Hey,happy to do my part (and pad the count)
There you go. I read it and felt morally compelled to reply. 10 more bits wasted. Another needy person deprived of the right to shoot off his mouth in cyberspace all because of me.
Wow…there’s another ten billion electrons zapped into oblivion.
Here’s my contribution to the cause. Glad to help out!
morally compelled, my ass. I just wanted to make the remark that someone should caluclate “post rates” such that
post rate = posts/views
and do some sort of expository study.
My quick views (I’ve been doing this for some time - can’t help it; I’m a statistician!) indicates that a majority of threads have a post rate between .05 and.10 or 5 to 50% of the readers post. What artificially skews this value downward, however, is the the inevitable “How’s my thread doing?” monitoring done by the OP.
Will someone help me write this into a grant? maybe we can get funding.
I absolute refuse to participate in this blatant attempt at post padding.
Hmm. I have nothing to add.
I’d consider playing the game if I understood the rules…
One post closer to 1000. 
I like peanut butter.
Me too. The crunchy kind.
So, are you coming to the Lunch Bunch tomorrow, Sqrl?
Ok, I’m here. Now, someone do something entertaining.
I don’t know what sort of entertainment you like.
One more closer to 300! Whoooooo!!
Oh, and I like cake. 
I have one thing to say …
This thread is like butter on a bald monkey.
(Don’t ask me how. I just like the phrase.)
One more closer to 10! (Is that the lint anniversary??) 
.