To me, the worst part of it wasn’t just what he said, but the clear fact that he fostered an environment where criticism of the administration was the rule of the day and openly practiced by his people. At this point, not only does he need to go, but a huge chunk of his administrative team needs to have their tickets punched.
Look, if Ford Motors decided to open a new branch in Europe, and shipped off a bunch of people there, and then three years later those people were quoted in the media as acting in the same manner toward their bosses back at Ford, their careers would be over right there. It isn’t quite the same here only in that, as Military Leaders, their behavior is WORSE in doing the same things. I have no doubt that it would NEVER enter their minds to say the same things about their superiors in the MILITARY chain of command. And yet here we had one of our top military leaders openly fostering and tolerating an attitude of contept towards the civilian administration they report to. Not Acceptable. Not Professional. Not Done.
A good point. This wasn’t just Stanley McCrystal speaking off-the-cuff to some reporter about how he felt about his bosses back in Washington. This is a general mocking his superiors in front of his staff and encouraging them to join in.
I’ve already seen two names suggested; Lt Gen David Rodriguez (McChrystal’s second-in-command and the guy in charge of day-to-day operations in Afghanistan) and Lt Gen William Caldwell (the head of the operation that’s training the Afghani military).
Whoa. I wonder where THAT came from. You’re like the master of the mixed message here. You start by giving me a link to address my confusion, then you follow it up with a dose of hostility to evidently discourage me from opening it.
This is about the mean things I’ve been saying about the Designated Hitter rule, isn’t it?
PROTIP: if you’ve got someone on ignore, don’t respond directly to them, even if someone you don’t have on ignore quotes one of their posts.
Oh, and since you’re not going to see this (nobody would be so churlish as to quote it just so he does, would they? Naaahhh.): :p:smack::dubious::p:smack::dubious:
Obama’s statement about welcoming debate but not tolerating division was right on the mark. What a stupid way to end his Army career. The downside is that we’ll probably see him run for office. I’m wondering if the floggings will continue down the chain of command for all involved.
I’m curious what happens to him now. Is he going to be unemployed? On guard duty in Nome? Does he end up with a cushy desk job? Does he get discharged with a fat pension? (Do generals even get discharged, or are they just put on inactive duty? I never see anyone described as a “former general.”)
A true American Hero. A man who stood up for what he believed in. A latter day John Wayne, willing to sacrifice for the greater good and American values.
There will be airports named after him, space stations, a movie of his story. We Shall Never Forget.
He may walk the halls at the Pentagon for awhile, but his power has been taken away and he’s tendered his resignation, so I suspect he’ll go to private life. Nobody is going to court martial a 4-star for this sort of offense and he could probably stick around, but he’s looking at at least two years and maybe six years before a president will look at him for that sort of position again.