Thank you, KellyM – that explanation helps, I think.
First, I don’t want to call you delusional. I may not understand always what you’re saying, but you seem to be very self-aware on this issue, and I’m dead certain that you’re more aware of your own mind than I am of your mind. It would be sheerest arrogance for me to call you delusional, and I won’t do that.
I do wonder what the difference is between “adopting a ‘feminine male’ role” and “accept[ing] that I really am female and act[ing] accordingly.” This is an honest question, not an attempt to suggest you’re lying or being inconsistent; I’m sure there is a difference, but it’s hard for me to see it.
Does the difference have a non-mental component – that is, is it a difference that a non-psychic third party could possibly detect? If so, what would that third party see to differentiate between the two?
If it was a purely mental reason, I guess it gets back to the original question: when you accepted that you really are female, to what does the word “female” refer? In some ways, it comes across to me as a symbol without a referent, something ineffable.
Currently your explanation makes sense to me along this level:
I spent my whole life assuming people were telling me the truth when they said I was galumphious. I tried pretending to be a fleepy galumph, but that didn’t help. It was only when I actually accepted that I was a fleep and acted accordingly that I found self-peace.
As I said before, I don’t really need to know what you mean by fleep or galumph in order to be happy that you’ve found self-peace; it’s curiosity that drives me to ask. And I’m willing to accept that you may be unable to define the terms (in fact, I think you may have said as much in your last post), and if that’s the case, that’s fine – I don’t need to understand what you mean to accept that you do mean something by it.
But if it’s possible to answer the question above, I’m curious.
Daniel