I didn’t keep track and don’t have time to go back and check what I claimed. Our wiki is out of date for links to games, so it’s not easy to find the game threads.
Why?
I did. That’s what happens when I catch up and respond to posts as I read them.
We still have nested quoting, you just have to do it the old fashioned way.
I simply cannot understand where you’re coming from. Players around here have bizarre attitudes regarding snippets of more or less useless information.
I explain myself every game. Believe my claim or not, the explanation is there.
If it is that important to you, you can look it up yourself. I even pointed to a nice list of the games I’ve played in.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I haven’t found anything worth voting for yet. I’ll have to do reread and vote later.
I’m at work, and something seems to be bogging down our access to the Internet here. I’ll complete this post when I’m home.
[spoiler]Pleo’s 10 recent games history (I’ve omitted malazan as it was quite a different style game)
Alien Taste 2
[ul]
[li]3rd party[/li][li]I found no day 1 claim[/li][/ul]Willow
[ul]
[li]Scum[/li][li]Claimed Town Power[/li][/ul]Mafia Games
[ul]
[li]Town Power[/li][li]Claimed Town Power[/li][/ul]Lord of the Rings
[ul]
[li]Town Power[/li][/ul]Castle of Crossed Destinies
[ul]
[li]Vanilla Town[/li][/ul]International Mafia
[ul]
[li]Vanilla Town[/li][/ul]Hotel of Heroes
[ul]
[li]Scum[/li][/ul]Glasnost
[ul]
[li]Scum[/li][/ul]Thundercats
[ul]
[li]Scum[/li][/ul][/spoiler]
For self-preservation reasons and the cases leveled against her by others, I’d like to Unvote Special Ed and vote Sister Coyote.
While at this point none of you can believe me, it’s for the best for town. Since I’m cop, and Sister Coyote has no claim so far, we’re much better off lynching her than me.
My unvote of Ed does not mean my suspicions on him have abated. Ed’s tenacious offense against me, where he seems driven to get me lynched and is making no particular effort to look at other cases, mirrors my own play as Scum in LOTR mafia where I did the exact same thing to him. I found him scummy, then less so, and now scummy again. I started thinking that scum wouldn’t keep going so obviously. But then I asked myself, what would town gain if they obsessed over one case to the exclusion of most else? So he’s looped back around to suspicious for me.
Gnarlie still strikes me as a little bit off. The Coyote case feels right to me, so it works out well that I need to switch to them for self-preservation, but Gnarlie is worth a further look. I’m gonna reread him a little later.
It tells me that the claim is really a null tell, he seems to do it whether he’s town or scum.
Pleo, he asked if there’s an easy way to preserve nested quotes. There is not, because people threw a shitfit over their own incompetence. Again, not bitter.
Ha. That’s horrible reasoning unless you believe that a player exists in some sort of quantum state before claiming. She has a role and that role, while unknown to us, could make her lynching worse or as bad as yours, especially given that several people simply don’t believe your claim so don’t go trying to make out like everyone knows you’re the cop because we don’t know. I would love however, for you to address Pede’s comment, which is, if you can detect whether someone is part of A:E or not, why are you described as a WEAK cop when your power seems pretty regular cop like?
I came to the same conclusion, but that’s really not the point. Ed’s been asking for this information since yesterday, and it was obviously important enough to him that he went and took time out of his busy day to go find it and summarize it. Ed’s got insights and opinions that are remarkably astute sometimes, and other times he’s nutty as a fruitcake. I was/am really curious as to what he gleaned from his research into this.
Is it really horrible reasoning? I know I’m cop, and I know that’s more worthwhile than somebody I don’t know anything about. Last I checked, I only have to justify my own reasoning for voting for somebody. If I know I’m a town role, isn’t it my job to keep myself alive as long as possible? I mean, the alternative is just letting myself die, right? Sure, if Sister Coyote claims, I’ll have to evaluate that claim.
Really? This again? I posted a discussion I had with Red Skeezix about that very thing. I pointed back to it when Pede asked about it. It’s been addressed. Maybe if I post it one more time, you’ll stop asking?
[QUOTE=Red Skeezix]
[QUOTE=Astral Rejection]
[QUOTE=Red Skeezix]
Name: R. Daneel Olivaw
Universe/Story: The Caves of Steel
Role: Weak Cop
Alignment: Consolidated Alliance of Raftdwelling Slumlords
Powers: Each night you may choose a player to investigate. You will learn whether or not that player is a member of the Associated League of Evil.
Wincondition: You win when all threats to the Consolidated Alliance of Raftdwelling Slumlords have been vanquished AND at least one member of the Consolidated Alliance of Raftdwelling Slumlords are alive.
[/QUOTE]
This sounds like “regular” cop. What are the limitations?
[/QUOTE]
You can only determine if a player is a member of the Associated League of Evil or not. A full cop investigates a player and determines their alignment.
[/QUOTE]
**Pleonast **is in the game, he’s a walking example of why scum might go out on a limb with an early claim. It’s not that uncommon a tactic, especially with a plausible but rare role in a closed game.
Heh, that’s why I think you’re likely to be 3rd-party survivor and angling to get the doc helping you out.
“Traditionally, night start was the default rule, with other possibilities considered to be variations.”
Granted, I don’t have any particular memory of how the Doper Mafia community plays in specific, but in general, Night Start is not uncommon enough to assume it’ll never happen.