I’ve just seen this clip. An interviewer talks to a politician about an oil tanker spill. The increasingly sarcastic politician assures the interviewer that it’s very rare for this to happen.
http://www.hutton-web-design.co.uk/tanker.html
What’s the story on this? Some of the comments I’ve seen on it say it’s a real political interview while others say its taken from a comedy show.
When you have seen John Clarke doing his thing for a couple of decades its hard to imagine anyone thinking this was anything other than a comedy sketch. But I guess the lack of a laugh track and the absolutely dead pan style that is Clarke’s trademark, with no mugging, no pauses for applause or laughter etc do differentiate what he does from most comedy sketches.
This is like the third thread I’ve read in various places asking this exact question. I’m simply astounded that it is not completely and utterly obvious that this is comedy from start to finish, although (equally obviously) based on a real event. Is it too subtle?
Where exactly have you seen comments that it’s real?
I think you could watch ten or twenty seconds of it and be in doubt, but not the whole thing. When he starts talking about cardboard, it’s as obvious as can possibly be.
The folks you’ve encountered who are saying it might be real are either winding you up, or have never encountered deadpan comedy before.
I know the guys that salved the vessel and investigated its state (with a view to determining why the front fell off). It was a disaster waiting to happen. I don’t know about cardboard, but certainly I remember one of the marine surveyors who went on board saying that when he went around the deck wacking things with a hammer looking for serious corrosion (standard marine surveying technique) he found more than a few instances of air vents and so on with rust holes bodged up with some sort of filler. Probably not papier mache (ie cardboard) but close.
The blogger at that link posted it as a sincere example of how Australian journalists are better than American journalists at asking hard questions of evasive politicians.
Yes, obviously, because only professional comedians are capable of sarcastic humour or deadpan wit. It is utterly inconceivable that someone making a witty response to a seemingly stupid question might actually be a real politician. No politician that ever lived has been capable of sardonic wit. I see it all now.
I’ll say it again. I watched the clip and initially thought it was comedy. Then I saw comments from various people claiming it’s real. And ONLY after seeing these comments did I question my original opinion.
If it’s young Americans making the comments, it’s likely that they’re thrown off by the utter lack of profanity in the sketch. I mean, everybody knows that comedians are supposed to cuss a lot.
One show that Clarke and Dawe worked together in was The Games, made before the 2000 Olympic Games, where they played the parts of two people working for SOCOG (the Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games). It’s a brilliant mockumentary, worth seeing if you can get it on DVD. One episode that I particularly liked had a builder who’d just finished building the 100-metre track, but it was 13 metres short, and they explored the consequences, such as a new Olympic record for the 87-metre sprint.