Defender of pedofiles and champion of pederasts. Defiler of truth. Wearer of the finest, most sheer veils that barely covers the ass of your bigotry. Go to the nearest insane asylum and give yourself to science. Surely they can come up with a cure for your pecular mental illness – Nostalgiaheimer’s: Where the mind tricks itself into believing Pleasantville was a documentary depicting the fall of the perfect United States at the hands of the women and the blacks.
The Perfect US where men could fuck whoever they wanted, yet all the girls were virgins and pre-marital sex was practically unheard of. Where there was no crime at all because of the code of White Man Chivalry precluded it. Where blacks were second class citizens and liked it.
You are a vile little man. Take your pseudo-politeness and crawl back under the rock of embarrasment shame that you recently came from.
Because I have to say that seems like kinda a fail, insofar as being a pedophile goes.
Or is this one of those, “Hey, Woody Allen is bad, so any accusation made against him, regardless of accuracy, must be applauded and not rebutted, or else!”
I make no comment on Woody Allen and his fucking of his girlfriend’s 22 year old daughter. All I’m saying is that Starving Artist is a vile man who should go back to hiding in shame.
TBF that post #54 and the next twelve or so posts read to me like an argument about a defense of plain old creepyness NOT of pedophilia. I would not censure SA over that.
For blindered nostalgia for a genteel time that was ruined by them damn dirty hippies, hell, sure. If only for giving the hippies all the damn credit.
And I, in turn, make no comment about Starving Artist’s vileness or lack thereof. All I’m saying is Woody Allen may be a pretentious and insensitive jerk for fucking his girlfriend’s 20 year old daughter, but there’s no hint of pedophilia in that story.
Short version : back during the Penn. State pedophilia hullaballooh, **Starving **was adamantly convinced of Joe Paterno’s innocence and asserted that it was physically impossible for a grown man such as Jerry Sanduski to buttfuck a kid in the showers, because the angles would be all wrong, you see ?
He then enjoined other posters to try and see for themselves, using a paper towel tube in lieu of a 10 year old.
Last I know, he was still utterly convinced Paterno didn’t spy Sandusky molesting a kid, but “innocent horseplay” between a naked adult and a naked kid. As is totally fine and not weird at all (another of his creepy as fuck assertions in that magnificent trainwreck).
Really? I should have thought by now that’s standard board lore. Way back when people were upset about the Penn State pedophilia, SA had some sort of explanation as to how it wouldn’t be possible for an adult to have sex with a kid standing up and it involved paper towel tubes. To be honest I didn’t pay much attention because it’s SA and there are a lot more productive things I could be doing than listening to him, like eating lead paint.
I was just trying to save people the bother of reading the preceding 13 posts unnecessarily. I make no judgment about whether SA is defending paedophilia again or kickstarting the paper towel tube industry or whatever.
It’s given me a better understanding of his tormented psyche.
His distaste of non-whites, non-Christians, non-males, and non-conservatives is well known.
So, it was educational for me to learn that SA values the intrinsic right of men (whether or not they’re liberal Jews) to fuck whatever they please over whether or not they have the right religion or political affiliation.
Basically, no matter what else a man is or does, as long as he fucks something in a manner most people consider grotesque or illicit (young boys, his girlfriend’s decades younger daughter, horses, etc), none of the rest matter.
