What exactly is the point of this pitting?
Is it the cardboard tube thing again, surely that has been done to death by this stage?
He thinks that liberals are like children, friendly enough, good enough, but need to be guided by their Conservative brethren, gently, but firmly.
Sometimes I wonder if this is also what Bricker thinks. And lots of other conservatives. That is not really such an awful thing to think, however, just condescending as hell.
That being said, the bit with the paper towel tube was pretty disgusting. I don’t think that means he is a pedophile, though. I just think he was enjoying the argument, to be honest, and taking a contrary position for the sake of it.
I’m not accusing him of trolling, just that he does feel the need to defend to death every assertion he’s made, like someone else said.
I am forced to agree. And however loathesome I find SA, I’m certainly not seeing him defend pedophilia in that specific thread.
And I think this thread is just to reaffirm that the majority of us don’t like the guy very much. It’s either this or we pit Bricker again (has it been three months yet)?
Again, that’s just how things work around here. 
Not everybody reads every thread.
No, but the paper towel tube jokes have definitely not been restricted to only a few threads.
Although I was initially biased towards agreeing with you on some limited points overall, I think your post really misrepresents things so badly that it is ultimately too much bullshit.
First, in the particular thread being linked to, SA did not simply post facts and make corrections. He introduced a dumbass observation as if it was compelling (“Didn’t Obama say that there was no widespread evidence of the ACA hurting jobs?”). Then, when presented with the fact that the statement is true and there is no widespread evidence of such, he fell back to a position of “Well, I was just making an observation. Not every post is an assertion or grounds for an argument!”. Then later, he comes back to whine “Why is everyone ignoring the problem!” It’s thus a useless, nonsensical, illogical contribution to a thread.
Second, SAs argument in the Sandusky thread cannot be, in any honest fashion, reduced down to the equivalence of arguing that a tall man could not have stabbed the victim of a homicide. He categorically and vociferously asserted that he had PROVEN Sandusky couldn’t have done this. He used PHYSICS to prove all of the stupid liberals wrong. His argumentation cannot be divorced from the lurid and disgusting elements – he exhorted us to get paper towel tubes and hold them at the height of a young boy’s anus and stick our dicks in them. He wanted us to squat thrust to prove that adult men could not get low enough to anally penetrate a boy. He wanted us to engage in thought experiments like “Imagine lining up 100 young boys” and asking them about anal sex. He knew that penetrative sex couldn’t have occurred because of the reported expression on the boy’s face! He knew better about the Pennsylvania rules about mandated reporting than a child psychologist working in Pennsylvania.
It was a fucking tour de force of delusional, illogical, nonsensical, overwrought and highly sexualized argumentation. His conclusions were iron clad and he brooked no disagreement.
Finally, he simply never, ever, ever contributes usefully to threads – at least, to political threads. He has literally asserted that all bad things that have happened in American society are the direct fault of liberals. Liberals allowed minority citizens to enjoy civil rights “too rapidly,” as if being fully free would be like a diver getting a case of the bends. His posts are typically walls of text, and he is immune to counterargument, to acknowledging empirical evidence to the contrary, or to simple reflection.
In short, he is the worst kind of poster one could imagine. He brings all the value of a troll; the only difference is that he really appears to mean what he says. So generally, I would agree that it’s unfair to tar current posts of his with his prior bad acts, but in reality there’s no upside to this guy.
I didn’t get it until someone explained it in this thread.
Or enough toilet paper.
And at least a third of the 20th.
He’s even told us exactly when - the country went to hell starting in 1968.
Damn women’s libbers …
[Moderating]
Please do not wish death on other posters.
No warning issued.
[/Modering]
(I didn’t dig for it, it was the first link for a google search “die of shame”)
I did not know it was possible to literally die of shame. I’ll remember that this turn of phrase is not allowed.
Is wishing for an itchy rash of shame OK, then?
OK, its time for someone to say something nice about Starkers. Somebody really should.
The cameras on To Catch a Predator really captured his good side.
Well, he is a nice punching bag. Nice training to get information to use in the real world when dunderheads like him start with their unsupported crap points.
“How shall we fuck off, O lord?”