First, they came for the morons, and I said nothing.
The End.
Shorter Bricker: Hmm. I could actually bother to educate myself on what I’m talking about, or I could instead make douchebag personal aspersions that flow from my partisan nature.
I guess I’ll go with Option B and be a douchebag.
If only someone had posted a succinct summary with quotes and links somewhere in this thread!
Ok, that’s fair. In my defense, that thread is …not short. But ok, fair point. Let me read the thread.
Good God, man, no! No! You’ve done nothing to deserve such a sentence, you are not old enough to be Mengele, and besides, he’s dead!
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=16743183&postcount=97
Please see this post from Kimstu in this thread, the link to her post in the other thread, and the summary she presents. Now, if you just read those, you’ll get the intellectual concerns about SAs argumentation. You won’t fully appreciate the visceral disgust that comes from his thought experiments, suggested physical experiments, and general manner of envisioning the whole sickening incident unless you read what he posted.
You know I don’t hold you in particularly high regard, but even so I cringe at the idea of you working through that mess in one sitting. I commend you for your integrity.
IOW, what elucidator said!
Actually I hope he does read the entire thread so he’ll see the incredible hysteria, mob mentality and obstinacy regarding the facts it contains so as to have a better understanding of the need for cardboard tube thought experiment in the first place. You have only yourselves to blame that it’s there.
That doesn’t sound good
I say this with utmost confidence and conviction: there has never been, and will never be, an exigency for a cardboard-tube boy’s rectum thought experiment.
We’ve had our run-ins in the past. But I implore you not to go through with this misguided plan. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy, and also some of SA’s posts in there will probably make you want to hurl. Trust us. Please.
As I’ve explained many a time it was never a surrogate little boy’s rectum. It was a guarantor, knowing the dishonest nature of the people I was dealing with, that they actually attempt the required movements in the required position rather that simply squatting and calling it good.
It’s amusing watching you people scramble trying to dissuade Bricker from reading that thread. I agree that it’s laden with scum and villainy but none of it is mine and I welcome a full reading of it so he can what I was up against in all its glory.
Cite??? And NOT a quote from Woody Allen.
You stated in two threads, in February and in October, that Woody didn’t meet Soon-Yi until she was an adult. You were corrected in February, yet made the same exact statement in October.
You also stated in February that Soon-Yi was not Satchel, Dylan and Moses’s sister (after all, they were only all Mia’s biological or adopted children), and that Mia brought the whole mess to public attention, though actually it was WOODY ALLEN who held a press conference after filing for custody of “his” three children. The papers he filed stated that Satchel was born in September (no, it was December, but who would expect Woody Allen to know the birthdate of his only biological child?), that Mia had accused him of molesting Satchel )a false allegation that Allen quickly dropped), and that Mia had filed an application to adopt two more children (not at that time).
In short, Starving Artist does have something in common with Woody Allen: He makes up facts as he goes along.
And if Bricker ends up wading through the 40 acres of bullshit opinion you posted to that thread, and doesn’t happen to agree with your assessment of the case, what then?
Win-win. 
Holy crap! I didn’t know Celine Dion was a pedophile.
You still don’t.
I’m surprised. It was all over the news.
I heard she may even be a francophone, which is even worse! *Mon Dieu! *
Goes back to her days with The Belmonts.
She’s a big fan of James Franco? Who isn’t?