No, it means what it says but has no relevance to his point.
If you were given the power to eliminate Hell, would you do so?
What I will tell you is that Romans 2 does not contradict anything I believe or have said thus nullifying by exclusion any point he was trying to make.:smack:
You think Atheists and Jews don’t love or like god? Equally or is this ‘dislike’ or “not love” different? How are Jews and Atheists different here?
(we’ll get into the nonsense of your statement AFTER you answer that question).
You can say it all you want, but you have yet to refute it in any meaningful way.
I would not accept that power therefore I wouldn’t even entertain that thought.
If it bears no meaning against what I’ve said or what I believe then what is left to refute?
Plenty of Jews love God but first you should look into the nonsense of your question about atheists loving and liking God:smack:
Do you think Atheists “do not like” or “love” god?
If Jews love God, why do they deserve hell ?
I would accept that power gladly and use it (assuming for the purposes of this discussion that Hell and souls that can be damned to Hell actually exist). That makes me more moral than your god, since I don’t wish eternal suffering to exist and, if given the power to stop it, I would stop it.
By the way, you’ve said several times what your point is not, how about telling us what it is?
You keep stating it, but you have yet to give a single reason why - you haven’t “explained” it, if you will - simply stating that it doesn’t apply does not make it not apply.
Maybe you could get all the pedophiles out and they could stay at your place:smack:
What do you want me to explain exactly? I bet you don’t even know?:smack:
watch the video
I want you to explain why it does not apply, or even possibly what it means - maybe you don’t know.
You keep using that icon :smack: … I don’t think it means what you think it means …
no - explain it - use your words.
Can you tell us what you think Hell actually is and what actually goes on there? I hadn’t pictured it as some kind of cosmic flophouse, myself.
I think he’s implying Leviticus 24:20.
Yeah, I got three minutes in, stopped when Jesus was assumed to be 33 ⅓ years old at the crucifixion and the author then used that number as the premise of later assumptions. That’s not how logic works, though - you can’t reliably use an unproven premise to prove other premises.