[QUOTE=even sven]
Once again the attitude persists that having a minimum wage job is some sort of character flaw and anyone that is working one surely deserves whatever bad stuff they get. How many of you would be bitching if your office job made you work Christmas? Honestly? You are going to tell me if your company decided to make you work on Christmas at the risk of losing your job because they thought they could make a few more dollars that you would be totally completely cool with it? No pit thread? And if your son or daughter’s job did that…cool? I honestly don’t think so.
I used to quit my job around the holidays and hope to get rehired for the new year. Bosses did not give a choice if you work or not. Since I lived four hours from my family, working would mean missing all of christmas. Not cool. Especially not for a job that A. wasn’t paying me enough to make a living and B. offered me no oppertunity for advancement. Being a store clerk is not at all equivelent to being a nurse. One, you are investing in a career. The other you are praying to get out of that career.
Minimum wage or not, the rent is due. It’s a crappy way to make a living and we don’t always have the option to hop right out and “find another job”. We are talking “lose house” and “tell kids it’s ramen for the next few weeks”. Those arn’t options.
Companies should make a commitment to their workers, minimum wage or not, and that should include giving them the option to spend the holidays with their families. Consumers should support companies that treat ALL of their workers well.
[/QUOTE]
I think employers should work with employees to allow days-off for their holiday of choice, giving preference to those who volunteer to work during peak holidays, like Christmas.
But I don’t think its fair to employers to accomodate everyone on the same holiday, unless the employer made promises to everyone that they’d get that day off. Maybe the pursuit of money is a bad thing in itself, but usually people working minimum-wage jobs need it more than anyone else, and I think employers should be able to generate wealth from all the vacationing consumers filled with the yule-tide spirit. That’s just smart business practice. As long as workers get some vacation time (unpaid or not), I don’t see a problem with a boss requiring them to work on a certain day.
As Seven wisely pointed out, not just “essential” employees are expected to work. We would all be pissed if internet service was not available, or there was no TV to watch. The airport still has to be open, and if you’re waiting for a plane, don’t you expect someone to sell you a cup of coffee or clean the public toliet? We’re spoiled brats, the lot of us, but my point is that we ALL are. If people who go to the movies on Christmas are assholes, so is the OP. So are you.
Holidays mean different things to different people. Christmas is a fun time and I would be sad if I had to miss it, but I also know that there a myriad of ways of making any day Christmas. If a day is really sacred to an individual and missing it WOULD be the end of the world for them, it would do them well to shop for jobs based on this criterion, or let employers know WAY ahead of time that it’s a day that cannot be missed. I know this is easier said than done, but it’s the only realistic advice I have.