That seems a bit of a leap. We are talking about a banking institution after all. I found it’s use a little annoying but no less so than “Drumpf” which can quite easily be seen as mocking Trump’s German heritage.
It was specifically directed towards a Jewish man.
And from the mods’ posts, Pearl Clutching Provocateur had already been told in previous days to knock it off.
It plays on the stereotype of the money grubbing Jew who pulls the financial markets strings. Goldman is a characteristically Jewish name so mocking it by splitting it into Gold Man references that stereotype.
It’s kind of like when Ellen Degenerse came out as gay on her TV show and people mocked her name by calling her Ellen Degenerate to reference the stereotype that gays were morally corrupt. That one was more obvious but it’s in the same vein.
Specifically directed towards a jewish man? PCP has been using that phrase all over the place and once a Jewish doper pops in to the conversation we call it an ethnic slur? Kinda lame.
No, it doesn’t change my opinion [replying to CarnalK], because he’s playing up the Jewish stereotype. Criticize the actions of that organization/person specifically without alluding to an offensive and well worn stereotype.
FWIW, the warning was for ignoring mod instructions. He was told to knock it off initially in a mod note.
It’s Goldman Sacks; no space between “Gold” and “Man”. You honestly don’t see a difference between “Goldman” a fairly common, Jewish last name and “Gold Man”, which is a purposely mangled version of “Goldman” to emphasize “money”?
The “ignoring mod instructions” is clear, but the basis for the note— that it’s an ethnic slur— seems shaky, unless PCP has a history (in his long tenure here since January) of making anti-Semitic comments that I’m not aware of. To me it’s a testicle joke, not a greedy Jew joke.
Has he made any disparaging nicknames for Blankfien or Chelsea’s husband or has he reserved it solely for a massive financial institution? Has he used “gold man” or “sacks” when referring to the descendants of the founders?
I am trying to explain to you that is an overly sensitive stance. It’s a banker stereotype that’s being played on while talking about a bank. Sometimes you don’t need to go dog whistle hunting. How does the “Sacks” part play into your explanation?
Eta: It’s just that this strikes me as similar to criticizing Israeli policy=anti-semitism which I find annoying.