No, I wouldn’t. LIke I said, if you’ve got some evidence that the pol in question tried to legislate against having an adultery, let’s see it. Otherwise, my question stands. Does a politician’s personal life mater or not? Not seeing what SSM, gay adoption, birth control and creationism has to do with extra-marital sex.
And it would appear that the OP is too busy ranting about other things to bother coming back to her own thread for a follow-up, so it’s really nothing more than a drive-by.
What’s to follow up? I thought it was funny, and posted it to the pit because that’s where I knew it would end up anyway.
I’m not required to respond to every asinine thing you post, this isn’t GD.
For better or worse, the American public have apparently decided that infidelity is something they don’t want in their elected officials. Why is this so hard to understand?