Forgive me. It’s apparently your writing skills that are the problem, not your attitude to fiscal responsibility.
The post from which i quoted contained three paragraphs. The first one dealt exclusively with the issue of membership and its relationship to people’s other financial commitments. The second paragraph, however, dealt exclusively with the ways in which the content of this message board would (in your opinion) improve after the subscription service kicks in.
Where in that post did you place your sentence about looking “forward to a smaller group of people who are a bit more fiscally responsible”? Not in the first paragraph, where you were dealing with the issue of balancing financial obligations. No, you plunked it right at the beginning of the second paragraph dealing with Board content, suggesting that this sentence was the topic sentence for that particular paragraph.
When you start a paragraph with a sentence saying that you “look forward to a smaller group of people who are a bit more fiscally responsible,” and then continue that paragraph with a set of claims about how the content of the boards might improve, is it not logical for us to make a direct connection between the two statements?
I agree with you that some people who are worried about the $5 might need to examine their overall financial situation more closely. But, to me at least, your post strongly implied a connection between people’s “fiscal responsibility” on the one hand, and the quality of their contributions to this message board on the other. And i just don’t see the correlation.
YMMV.