It’s kind of a 3D satellite client for Google Maps, with a ton more cool features. Zooming, tilting, superimposed markers for bars, schools, restaurants, ATMs, whatever.
Larger cities have 3D models of buildings, so you can re-create cityscapes, or see them from different angles.
Part of me thinks Google is actually trying to take over the entire internet, and another part of me thinks that really wouldn’t be so bad.
Very awesome, except I wish they’d use the USGS maps when they’re better…the resolution in my hometown is craptastic, and Terraserver does a much better job with that particular area.
That said, combining google’s search functionality with satellite maps is awesome.
So are these current images? I ask because this morning I left our SUV parked at an angle, half way down the drive way…and that’s how it is showing up on the image. (I never park the car like this).
Give 'em a coupla months.
GOOD:
Yes, it’s cool, fun, and has lots of neat tricks. Great to be liberated from north orientation, and the tilt is good. I like the drawing pin thingy.
BAD:
The photographic library can’t live up to the tech. Tilting a 2-D photo looks just weird. My house ends up as a roof sitting on the lawn. The 3-D cities look cheesy.
The maps that it downloads seem to be identical to the ones used in the satellite portion of maps.google.com
However, the program provides more functionality: it allows you to overlay layers of things (roads, water features, landmarks, retail establishments, etc.; it allows you to search for directions and then follow the actual roads used in a smooth fashion, turning with the road and such; it allows you to easily tag maps with locations and notes (something I don’t think you can do with the online version). There’s probably more, but that’s what I recognized as different.