I’ve been seeing lots of poo-pooing regarding Gore’s possible running again in 2004. But what exactly is the huge problem? He won the popular vote two years ago. He lost the race in a photo finish, but it’s worth noting that the camera that took the photo was out of focus, had a flat battery, the film was loaded backwards and the lens cap was still on.
Why do you think it wouldn’t be just as close in '04?
• He’d presumably get all the same votes he did before, plus a few thousand more from democratic couch potatoes who didn’t vote in '00, and are still kicking themselves for it.
• Maybe a few thousand Greenies would have 2nd thoughts and actually cast a vote to put GWB out of the oval office, rather than cast ‘conscience votes’ that would do nothing but keep Gore from getting in.
• A few thousand people in Miami-Dade county would make a real effort to actually look at the ballot to see who they cast their vote for, and that they actually punched a hole clear through the ballot so it won’t be rejected by a machine.
• Pat Buchanan won’t run again, so a few thousand people in Palm Beach (3,407), Hillsborough (845), Marlon (563) & Pinellas (1,010) counties won’t accidentally vote for him.
• A few thousand fence sitters who voted for Bush but have grown sour on his performance (and that of his cabinet) might swing the other way this time.
Add Bill Clinton to the campaign trail (whether Gore wants him or not), and suddenly we’ve got a decent chance at the White House again.
A snowball’s chance in hell? I say not. More like a snowball’s chance in North Dakota.