Last year my son was a second grader. He had a number of assignments throughout the year that included the phrase: “…and no Pokemon!” He was asked to read and do brief reports on several chapter books, for example. He had to do a poster on some subject he liked. he had to do a project that illustrated math concepts. For each of these, his teacher included an instruction on the assignment sheet that said he couldn’t use anything Pokemon-themed. I assume she did this after experience in being deluged with Pokemon related stuff.
So this fall, my son comes to me. “Papito,” he says, “I think Ms. S----- was wrong to not let us use Pokemon. For example, we had to learn about probabilities and estimating.” (They had a circle divided up into eight pie pieces, with four red, two blue, one white, one green, and had to answer questions like, “Is it very likely that a spinner would land on green, or very unlikely?”)
"In Pokemon, I made this chart to see how rare certain Pokemon in such-and-so region are. See? Every time I encountered a Starly, I made a mark here, Every time I encountered a Ponyta, I made a mark on this line. After about a hundred, I got 42 Starlys and only 6 Ponytas, so i know Starly is pretty common and Ponyta is pretty rare.
“So I was thinking, even though she’s not my teacher any more, I could give her this chart and maybe she’d let this year’s class use some Pokemon in their work, because it really does teach things.”
This is a no-brainer, right? Of course he should do that. What’s the harm?
Is there any chance this might seem challenging or disrespectful? He may have that same teacher again for fourth grade as the school is contemplating switching teachers around.