We’re in the Pit, which by the way wouldn’t exist if we could only insult people we knew. On this board you have to be judged by your posts alone and your post came across as harsh and unfeeling. Also dumb: what the hell does female genital mutilation in some African states have to do with this? That came across as oh we can’t criticize the Saudis because some Christian countries have barbaric practices too.
I’m sorry that facts bother you so much. There is a misconception that female genital mutilation happens only in Muslim countries, otherwise Politifact wouldn’t have created a page about it.
Criticize all you want, that’s not going to help that poor Saudi woman, and I doubt TrumpCo is going to do anything since he’s a big fan of Shariah law.
I’ve never treated you with disrespect. In fact, I have not treated anyone on this forum with disrespect. Normally I treat others with the same respect they’ve shown me. But lately I’m in no mood to be ugly, so you’ve just won a spot on my ignore.
Just like any other culture huh. Just like those cultures where they “honor kill” rape victims, or practice forced female circumcision (mutilation) or any other abomination.
OK, if you say so.
Maybe if those assholes weren’t backward fucked up scumbags, doing horrible shit, we wouldn’t hear about it???
just to ask jayne a question south Africa practiced apartheid until the us artistic community(among others ) got involved in helping to eliminate it and free mandela … should everyone have rolled over and said … well that’s just how they do things… ?
It’s not a matter of whose culture is right: it is a matter of the fact that cultures are different and you have NO RIGHT to dictate what someone else’s culture should be like. You have no right to dictate customs, values, and morals in another culture. If you think you do, then you are deeply wrong.
Female genital mutilation is not common in most modern day Arab cultures. The vision most Americans and Westerners have of Islamic culture is very skewed by bigotry, ignorance, and lack of critical thinking skills.
For example: most modern day Christians do not abide by the primitive tenets of Christianity, like stoning adulterers. Most modern day Islamic cultures also do not abide by the primitive tenets of Islam. Those with full sharia law, such as Saudi, generally do, but most do not. Also keep in mind that Saudi is a small country with a small population. Compared to the total number of Muslims on Earth, only a very tiny minority live in Saudi, in the whole of the ME as a matter of fact.
You all assume that all Muslims do things that only sharia law countries do. That’s like saying all of America is exactly the same as Wyoming, which is the least populated US state. In fact, most of the country is very different from
Wyoming.
Saudi has a population of 29 million. The world population of Muslims is 1.6 billion.
You are making a false analogy. Sharia law is the law of Islam, the original law, and the law, therefore, of Muslims, who are more than 99% of the population of Saudi Arabia.
Apartheid was a law of the European imperialist government, of the invaders and oppressors over the indigenous people. Totally different thing.
And keep in mind that in the West, up through Victorian times, which ended early in the 20th century, women where the property of men. Women were ‘chattle’. The term chattel comes from a Middle English word meaning “property.” It is commonly used to refer to degraded or enslaved people; those seen as property.
It is only within the past 100 years that women in the West have gained such freedoms as they have nowadays. Islamic culture and religion are many hundreds of years younger than Western culture. In the ME, most of these countries were primitive cultures up until oil was discovered in the mid-20th century.
I am surprised that people on this board seem to have a world view with such a limited perspective.
How so? The Afrikaners had been there since the 1700s. How many generations of local ancestors does one have to have before one can participate in the country’s government?
So the difference is that Sharia law is a system of savagery and bigotry that is 1000 years older than apartheid. And therefore even more fucked-up and removed from modern reality. Who could argue with that? In fact, I think I would like to subscribe to your newsletter, The Trolling Bigot, for more delightful insights like that.
actually no the original religion of the middle east was a mix of Judaism, byzantine orthodox and what became the catholic church
Islam was a rebuttal to what Mohamad considered the spiritual corruption of said byzantine empire and how they treated the parts of the middle east they conquered (sources said used the mideast as their version of Bangkok and treated the natives worse than dirt )
but in the house of saud’s case when they were trying ot take over no one but an almost dead obscure branch of Islam was the only support they could get and they cut a deal …