I saw a clip on Discovery Canada last night featuring Jearl Walker, a science educator who wrote The Flying Circus of Physics. He attributed the downward flow of the tiny nitrogen bubbles to the attachment of organic molecules as they moved upward through the Guinness (central and not seen because of the colour/thickness of Guinness) and not just due to the turbulent flow characteristics. Any ideas?
Jearl Walker’s book The Flying Circus of hysics was and still is a great repository of oddball physics, but he hasn’t revised it since it came out 30 years ago, and there’s been a lot of work since. His website has been up and down with revamps.
Walker usually draws his stuff from the work of others. A search using Google Scholar turmns up a number of interesting papers on beer bubble flow (there was one several years ago on this topic that I sent to Dave Barry, but I can’t find it now). Here are a few:
TI: Bubble Growth and Dissolution on Ascent in Water: Applications to Bubbles in Beer and Methane Bubble Dissolution in a Water Column
AU: * Zhang, Y
EM: youxue@umich.edu
AF: The University of Michigan, Dept. of Geological Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1063 United States
AU: Xu, Z
EM: zhengjiu@umich.edu
They seem to think the small bubbles are easily pulled down by the flow, from the abstract. No mention of proteins.
**Food and Bioproducts Processing
Print ISSN: 0960-3085 | Electronic ISSN: 1744-3571
Volume: 79 | Issue: C1
Cover date: March 2001
Page(s): 13-20
Characterizing Gas Bubble Dispersions in Beer
Author(s): N. J. Hepworth 1 | J. Varley 2 | A. Hind 3
CITATION] Gas entrainment by plunging jets
AK Bin - Chem Eng Sci, 1993
The Physics of Fizz
P Weiss - Science News, 2000 - JSTOR
… Fletcher says that the new bubbles, with diameters smaller … buoyancy and momentum
to resist the downward currents and so … sim- ulations only apply to beer in the …
. . . and the column under discussion would seem to be Why do the bubbles in Guinness Stout float down? Dunno if any observed effects in the published studies would be different for nitrogen as opposed to carbon dioxide, as Cecil implies, but I’m also not sure what exactly “the attachment of organic molecules as they moved upward through the Guinness” means, either. At any rate, there seems to be agreement the interior movement of the bubbles is masked by the stout’s opacity, and the downward movement observed at the outskirts is a corollary effect (that is, not all the bubbles are flowing downward).
I can think of other double-tap nitrogen beers that have a similar “surging” effect. Belhaven and Boddington’s are good examples. This leads me to believe that the nitrogen has to have some effect.