Why is it that girls pants come in sizes of even number and are “short”, “average”, or “long” and guys get to have the wondeful variety of mixing and matching their pant needs in inch measurments?..
aaaaand…why is it that girls always have buttons on the right side and guys have buttons on the left side?
I can answer the latter…
Of course, it’s all tradition: all real ladies are dressed by a maid, who does the zips and buttons up, hence right-over-left for the wearer.
Men do it all themselves, so it’s left-over-right.
They really only have 3 or 4 men length sizes at most places. 30,32,34, and sometimes 36. Occasionally I will see a 28, but in the whole time I worked at farily large a jean section at a large retail store we only received three or four of them by accident. So even though it seems like we have a huge section of pant sizes you could really just call them short, medium, long and sometimes extra long if you wanted to.
I dunno about that. I used to wear 28s back when I was a young and skinny fellow, and from there I went to a 29 (admittedly the odds are a bit harder to find, but not spectacularly so). I’ve since pudged up to a 34 but at various times I’ve had 31s, 32s, 33s, a couple 35s… and I’ve seen 40s on the racks sometimes. And this is just jeans at mainstream shops, btw.
Guys or girls, who couldn’t use fan pants ?
Well, me, for one.
RR
Women wear shoes with different heel heights, so sometimes she might be a short, sometimes a medium, and sometimes a long (although those would have to be some mighty high heels!). I think that’s the reason. I almost always wear heels, so I wear a medium length. But if I’m in tennis shoes, I’m tripping over my pants.
40 inch inseam? That’s a long pair of pants!
My daughter has a 28-inch inseam. That’s even shorter than most petites. In a store with an exceptionally broad inventory she can sometimes find the right size, but lately she’s been getting capri pants and wearing them as full length.
I think it’s specifically to drive us insane.
FYI, I don’t think there’s a pair of platform shoes tall enough for me to fit into most “regular length” women’s jeans. They are usually 4-5 inches too long (and I wear them crumpled up and bruching the ground). Apparently, pants designers think it’s really “regular” for a woman wearing size 6 (29" waist) to be 5’7". And, at most retailers of casual-type clothing, they don’t even bother offering a “short” and “tall” version for many of their trendier styles. But I’m not bitter, oh, no.
However, I have heard that women “don’t like” true sizing. I have no idea how “they” know this, since it has not, to my knowledge, been tested by any retailer.
I think it’s that no woman wants to say she wears a “29”.
Same reason we don’t use the metric system for measurements, at least in the USA. No woman wants to say she’s 91cm-61cm-91cm (36"-24"-36").
I have the opposite problem, 6’2" with a 36" inseam, high street shops rarely/never have jeans or trousers long enough. I get my clothes online from Long Tall Sally, who do 34", 36" and occassionally 38" inseams.
Hey, now, they don’t look all bad. They seem perfect for someone with no ass and needs to fake one.
I was talking about length not width.
The best incentive I’ve found is that I cannot ever find trousers to fit me in my more-generous frame - 38" waist, 30" leg. 36/30 was hard enough.
Still haven’t lost any weight, though :rolleyes:
According to the Imponderables series, nope. There is evidence that plenty of men were dressed by servants as well.
Men’s jeans usually have the range of waists and inseams to which the OP refers, but dressier trousers often offer very little choice for a given waist. Sometimes it seems like they only come in one length, assuming, in my case, that every man with a 32" waist is 6" tall. And it’s not like I’m fat, either. So after I have them hemmed and put them on, they fit me as they would a scarecrow.
Few topics get my temper burning faster than pants sizes. I wear 34-36 and they are next to impossible to find. Once I called Levi Strauss customer service to ask them if it was possible to get pants in 36 inch length. I wanted to know if there was a way I could order them because I was having a difficult time finding that size. She said they don’t make that size anymore. Bastards.
Now I wear Carhart Jeans . I’m a Carhart man from now on. They look better on me anyway.
The wacky thing that I’ve found about men’s pants is that it’s apparently easier to find short lengths to fit if you have a huge waist. I’m a 32 waist and 29/30 inch inseam and I’ll often have trouble finding 32 inch waists with short lengths. But there will be dozens of 40 inch waists with 30 inch inseams on the rack. I don’t get it.
Who wears a 36" inseam? I’m 6 feet tall and I wear a 32!
I love Carhartts. They’re comfortable, too. The only problem I’ve had with them is that the crotch hangs a bit low. I wear them onstage with my band - one night I lifted my leg to climb up onto the stage… and the crotch ripped right out of my pants! I was glad I was wearing a long shirt…