As a strike four would get the ump thrown out of the game by the others, I can see only the right wing echo chamber now grasping at straws.
So basically we’re falling back on rogue employees in the counsel’s office now. Acting alone.
Employees of the counsel’s office can’t give orders to Carter Hull. Unless they are speaking for Wilkins.
So basically you have no evidence for it, only what the blobiators at the right wing media are giving you, as the case against the dreamers demonstrated, not everything what the right media reports is golden, far from it, the racist agenda showed and never once you wondered if it was a good idea to continue to carry water for them.
In this case, while the faults of the IRS are already acknowledged and the responsible were sacked or named, what the right wing is expecting now is exaggerated like what the promised results on the case against the dreamers. And the dumb part is to expect that a lot will happen now, after other respected media is reporting that there is no evidence of White House involvement.
You cant be serious. So far three high level IRS managers have “testified” before congress. Each one took the fifth amendment and refused to answer anything.
Are there no limits to what you Marxists will do to defend government corruption?
That is no evidence, and that is only what a fascist would consider to be evidence proudly.
BTW I´m on the record of condemning Marxists, so even there you only show to all that you are deluded.
Gigo, if we had all the evidence, the investigation would be over. That’s why it’s still going on.
Thus my statement that now that we know Carter Hull wasn’t acting on his own, we have to keep going up until we find out who ordered the targeting.
Now if Wilkins was supposedly unaware, we have to find out which employee in his office decided he had authority he didn’t have. That’s a pretty serious offense, an employee with no authority vested in himself taking it upon himself to order the IRS to target Tea Party groups.
Of course, that’s if you believe that the answer to every scandal is a rogue employee.
Yea sure. You trying to defend an out of control government agency who can seize your assets without a trial, yet none of their people will testify? And you’re calling me names?
You can claim whatever you wish. Your defense of these corrupt policies is evidence enough. If you don’t have the stones to defend your political ideology, don’t come crying to me.
Well, you know how those Marxists are! I don’t, myself, because even though I’ve been on the conservative wing of the extreme left most of my adult life, I don’t actually know any. Except for Giggles. He’s the only one I know, and that’s just because you say so.
Does anyone see the irony of someone demanding evidence before convicting the IRS, an organization that doesn’t need evidence to go after you? Expecting the IRS to prove its innocence is merely what the IRS expects of the citizenry.
Oh, well, that’s just liberal hypocrisy, we’re lousy with it. Part of why it annoys us so much when a paragon of honesty and candor like yourself shows up, and rubs our noses in it. I mean, isn’t one of you guys enough?
Besides, relax! The investigation is ongoing, just as you say. That smoking gub is gonna hit the news any minute now! Hours. OK, maybe a couple of days, a week. Or so. Someday.
We’ll see what Lerner has to say when she’s given immunity.
What’s the holdup? According to the “Hon.” Mr. Issa, she waived her fifth amendment rights a month ago.
Nah, only workers that thought it was clever to investigate by keyword. It was bad as I also pointed out elsewhere and I thought the punishment so far was fair, except that, just like the acorn case, the investigation later showed a lot of exculpatory evidence.
And they have that right, only a fascist will insist that is evidence enough.
Nope, this is the moment to notice you are a **certifiable **dolt for believing that that that is Marxism.
And no, I’m not crying but laughing, as I pointed before Liberals do love when extremists like you are so “helpful” to your cause. Moderate republicans need to constantly learn what is the Republican party nowadays.
Yea right. We don’t need evidence. We’ll simply confiscate your property without cause.
And you would call it what? Due process?
Like I said, what do you call it?
They don’t know if they need her yet. If they don’t need her testimony, then they want to reserve the right to prosecute her. If they can’t get anywhere, then they’ll make a deal with her.
Workers didn’t do anything except but what they were told to do. You’re sticking to an old story that has long since been discredited. Not a single worker has been demonstrated to have acted in a ‘rogue’ manner. All of them followed instructions exactly as given to them by management.
No you repeated dolt offender, I was referring to the right to take the fifth.
Yes, and as the saying goes, one should not blame malice when incompetence will do. The point I am making is that simply the right wing propaganda machine is right now overreaching on what to get from this, and I am only pointing out that with this ¨silly¨ item of presumed innocence it is more reasonable to expect very little else and one should demand the sources of information one has to gain some perspective.
Otherwise, as in the ACORN case, the rotten behavior of your sources of information is ignored as it is the exculpatory evidence of the ones that were sacked thanks to people like Issa or FOX news.
Who is this “they” with prosecutorial power?
CMC fnord!