We’ll reply however we please, within the rules of the forum. Now, please read the linked threads; if you find anything to dispute after that you are welcome to do so.
I’ll make a point I’ve made in a previous thread on the subject. If some rogue element was going to simulate a terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, would it not have been far simpler to go ahead and hijack the planes rather than concoct some absurdly complex scheme to fake the effects of planes crashing into them?
Have you read through the other thread yet? The one with page after page after page after page of refutations of these stupid conspiracy theories? How about you read through all that so we don’t have to repeat ourselves? And after you’ve read all that, how about you come back and tell us that you’re convinced, and ask for this thread to be locked?
And this is covered over and over again in the previous threads.
What exactly is the POINT of hijacking these planes and crashing them into buildings you’ve already got wired for demolition?
If your conspiracy can wire the buildings for demolition, then hijacking planes and crashing them into the buildings is stupid and counterproductive.
If your consipiracy can hijack planes and crash them into buildings, then wiring them for demolition is stupid and counterproductive.
Minotaurus…if that IS your real name…do you believe that planes crashed into the World Trade Center? If so, what possible purpose could be served by the conspirators wiring the buildings with explosives, even assuming you could do such a thing without the thousands of people in the building noticing?
When will you come back and admit that you made a mistake opening this thread?