Harry Knowles and his creepy "Ain't It Cool News" site.

Generally, I have no problem with extreme nerdiness. To some degree, I am one–I frequent comic book message boards and other card-carrying nerd activities. But this AICN site, which I’ve been looking at recently, completely creeps me out. You can almost smell the Dungeons & Dragons-marathon smell rising from your computer screen–a distinct blend of B.O., cheese doodles, and suburban rec-room fake wood panelling.

I find the popularity of this site interesting. Certainly, no one can honestly say that they read the idiotic, digression-prone reviews for their critical analysis, which is almost always juvenile and absurd. They’re often unintentionally funny, with their numerous typos and malapropisms–“The title FULL FRONTAL is purely allegorical!”[sic]. Knowles himself writes in the dot-dot-dot style of the mid-nineties internet: “Saw TRON for the 400th time…It made me wet down there…”. He also employs a creepy nerd-speak that almost always has something to do with pissing or coming all over yourself: “THE MATRIX RELOADED was so good I squirted a load onto the screen.” I just made that one up, but it has that clammy, sexually frustrated AICN feel to it. You really can’t pin down Knowles’ taste because he seems to like everything–which of course is just another way of saying that he has no taste at all. The completely unwatchable DAREDEVIL movie? “Perfect”. The crappy ATTACK OF THE
CLONES? “Beautiful”.

Knowles strikes me as a perfect example of a particular type that has emerged recently: the sub-literate, fat, 30-something virgin, who, as he’s said, “watches movies 24 hours a day”, and derives his entire world-outlook from crappy Hollywood spectacle. Jesus Christ, if I watched movies 24 hours a day I would blow my brains out. Actually, one could speculate that Knowles, like his pasty-faced followers in the “talk-back” forum, probably watches movies so compulsively to AVOID blowing his brains out. But there was something interesting revealed recently in one of his reviews, something that, from a psychoanalytic persepctive, revealed alot about him. Apparently, his first exposure to film was through his mother, who obsessively watched old-starlet movies like Jean Harlow’s over and over and encouraged little Harry to do the same. One could say that Knowles, with his compulsive viewing-repetition, his embrace of movies for the sake of movies, regardless of how shitty they are, is still feeding from the maternal breast, still the same little boy who needs his mommy in the displaced form of “watching movies 24 hours a day.” Then again, that analysis might be bullshit, but who knows?

Another problem is that a site like AICN is feeding the ever increasing shittiness of Hollywood movies. Crappy, bloated nerdfests like the last two MATRIX movies (I loved the first one) could only have been created in the over-hyped, spectacle-for-the-sake-of-spectacle atmosphere of contemporary Hollywood, an atmosphere that AICN contributes to. Exreme nerd culture of the AICN type is also responsible for the dissapointing new STAR WARS movies which, as they become less fun, less like the originals, and more hermetically nerdy and obscure (when the word “medi-chlorines” was used in Ep 1 you could feel half the audience tuning out) are clearly responding to 25 years of STAR WARS nerd culture, with their eternal debates about Boba Fett’s origin and other bullshit.

Why don’t you tell us how you REALLY feel.

I don’t like the site either, but as a happy and relatively normal nerd I take some offense to the way you’ve chosen to state it.

FWIW, most nerds that I know hated “midichlorians” as much as I guess you did. Perhaps your brush was a little overly broad.

HATE SPEECH! HATE SPEECH!! LOCK THE THREAD!!!

I used to enjoy Knowles site and still visit it from time to time.
But I have to disagree that he is “feeding the…shittiness of Hollywood movies.” The stuff I’ve read has been very pro-originality and very anti-formula in terms of movies. I don’t think the ‘nerd-culture’ embraced or encouraged the crappiness of the Star Wars prequels at all. I think they were quite upset with it as a whole. The crappiness of the prequels was solely due to George Lucas and his mis-artistry of story and eye-candy, and also his ‘new-age’ bias (e.g. midichlorians).

I agree that his grammar and language as a movie reviewer is juvenile and speaks to a very, very narrow audience. In this his site is a debasement of culture. Also, my annoyance goes up every time he starts talking about his trip to the theater, who he was with, what they ate, etc. Who gives a shit about his dull life? Just review the friggin movie.

The sexual-frustration tint to everything is certainly obvious. I would agree that a lot of it is sexual ‘acting-out’, due to a stunted sexual maturity for whatever reason.

The excitement of the site when it first started was all the scoops and inside info on movies way before they hit the screen. It’s left that behind and is now pretty mundane.

I think part of the problem (or charm) of Harry’s reviews is that the story is only part of the cinema experience for him. Harry loves films so much that bad plotlines or poor acting can be easily excused as long as there another aspect of the film he can be excited about. In his Attack of the Clones review, he only used “beautiful” once in reference to the film and that was referring to the digital film making process. The man loves films and loves to be excited about films. Nothing wrong with that IMHO.

Creepy? Not compared to some of the slash fanfic out there.

I fundamentally disagree with your position and find your tone offensive.

Is Knowles overweight? Big Time - he acknowledges it all the time. Is he a film geek? Oh yeah - obviously.

Does he contribute to the output of bad Hollywood films? Sorry - no way. If anything, quite the opposite - did you read about his site’s concerns about the recent JJ Abrams’-penned Superman script? (AICN revealed that the script had huge differences between known Superman history and generated a big fan-boy backlash - it was discussed here at the SDMB) How about his meeting with/and review of John McTiernan’s Thunderball remake (AICN loves McT, but went on to trash the movie - deservedly so - which led to editing changes)? And how about tons of support for the LOTK trilogy - Harry and AICN have done a ton to create buzz for the first movie and keep it going over the past couple of years.

Bottom line? Harry is a fanboy and a film geek, with too much time on his hands, and therefore has explored many, many different genres of film, and has opinions on most of them. And - he has figured out a way to make a living from that. Does he come across as a clammy-handed fanboy? Sure, a bit - but his passion comes through, and for the most part, I tend to agree with a lot of positions he and AICN take regarding how a movie should look and feel.

You seem to have a issue with the site that goes beyond just not liking it. YMMV, but I find the site informative, and I can handle the writing style - not great, but I get the info I need and I like their analysis…

my $.02

Did you happen to see this over at Something Awful? Ain’t It Cool News was also the Awful Link of the Day over there a few days ago. Vicious, but funny.

I can never get past the first page because the interface is so terrible.

I go there regularly and read the reviews, despite disagreeing with most of the regular writers there. You are completely wrong about the Nerd Culture feeding the corporate movie scene. If anything, Nerd Culture helps prevent every movie from becoming Scooby Doo by viciously attacking such things. If you bothered to read the talkbacks (which i honestly don’t blame you for, they have the biggest trolls in the universe) you’d see gigantic backlash against the Matrix’s all visual no substance sequals. Plus reading illiterate 35 year old parents’ basement dwellers insult each other is comedy gold.
There is a lot of sucking up going on, and Harry’s reviews are worthless except for the WTF factor, and the colors are horrid, and they don’t update news as often as they should, but they are a pioneering site and not deserved of the criticism you heaped.

Yeah - what Tars Tarkas said!

And cuauhtemoc - that lampoon site was really funny.

So it isn’t the slickest site, but not deserving of that slams you gave it in the OP…

The AICN site makes the SDMB look like it’s moving on rocket skates, and that’s using a DSL connection. Christ almighty, that site is sloooooooooooooow. It’s amazing that the typical AICN visitor has the patience to wait for the screens to load.

Still, for what it does, I guess it does it well enough. I visit once or twice a week, and TalkBack occasionally. I still think of “Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back” every time I do, though, and that’s what keeps me from getting involved too much.

I wonder how many studio execs lurk at that page looking for “geek feedback” on their ideas.

Harry only gets credit for giving Undead a good review, otherwise http://hollywoodbitchslap.com/feature.php?feature=724

I agree. It’s like he just learned HTML.

I read Aint-it-cool daily. There is much to hate. But there is also much to like, if you can get past the shitty design and the borderline unintelligible writing.

Harry may very well be a socially maladjusted freak, and his writing may suck, but he loves film, and he is damn knowledgeable. He may spooje about a new bit of coolness like the Matrix trilogy (which I’ll agree should have stopped after the first one), but he also knows more than any other movie-site operator about stuff from the 30s, 40s, and 50s. I will frequently plow through the wretched grammar and egregious ellipses in his reviews just so I can pick up some tidbit about a forgotten film classic (e.g., the Burt Lancaster pirate flick from which the walking-under-the-rowboat bit in Pirates of the Caribbean was borrowed).

I don’t think this is a function of Harry’s site in particular, but I will agree that the Internet in general has been feeding the success of stuff like the Matrix trilogy and Scooby Doo and Underworld and so on. It’s not that Aint-it-cool and the other sites actively promote those movies; they quite specifically warned people away from dreck like League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and Tomb Raider 2. But the sheer ubiquity of those submit-your-review sites, and indeed message boards like this one, feeds the desire of self-proclaimed movie geeks to see everything just so they can formulate and offer up an opinion. It’s irrelevant whether Terminator 3 sucked (which, in my opinion, it did); it goes beyond simply being a movie and becomes a social event wherein everybody goes to the cinema and then later congregates in a virtual space for a critical circle-jerk. Yes, the movies are generally crap, but the admission ticket to these exclusive discussion groups is saying you’ve seen the movie in question.

It’s ironic, I think, that the egalitarianism of the Internet and the opening of analysis to Just Anybody, as exemplified by Harry’s site among others, rather than helping us to steer ourselves away from the junk as one might have predicted, has instead caused many people to want to seek membership to that club, thus feeding the frenzy around these Event Movies.

But attacking Harry? That’s just misguided.

Oh man, that made me laugh my ass off. Thanks for the link.

JdeMobrey: I don’t think I’m engaging in hate speech. What, because I called Harry Knowles fat? Fine, he’s “pleasingly plump”. But, more to the point, he’s an awful, toadying critic who epitomizes fanboyism at its worst.

And what’s all this about an offensive tone? I’m worried about him, that’s all. Being that geeky is unhealthy. Maybe he could eat a salad or acknowledge that TRON might not in fact be a cinematic masterpiece worthy of the deepest, the very deepest veneration.

I go that site for a few reasons: First, I’m curiuos about any new info on EPISODE 3. I’m sure the movie will be piece of shit, but that doesn’t mean I don’t have a sentimental attachment to the franchise like anyone born in the mid to late seventies. Second, it’s a good place to follow progress on various comic-book adaptions, which I’m always curious about. But, as I said before, the reviews and opinions are absolute garbage.

I’m not the first to theorize that fanboy culture, which emerged in the early-eighties in the form of STAR WARS and STAR TREK fanaticism, is largely responsible for the crappiness of the new SW movies and the last 2 MATRIX movies. The wholly disposable Boba/ Jango Fett plot in Ep 2 was clearly a carrot offered to fanboys who’ve lionized the character. The film also contains a wealth of meaninglessly complicated expositon–the Sith, the Kin, the Kith, midichlorines, whatever–absolutely inexplicable to anyone who isn’t a fanboy, the type who buys the novels and comic-books.

I have no problem with nerd culture per se. But it seems to have formed an alliance with idiotic sites like AICN and is starting have a pernicious influence on movies. UNDERWORLD has already been mentioned. Exception: The LORD OF THE RINGS movies which are wonderful. Not particularly memorable or innovative, but fun and extremely well-made.

Unfortunatly the site basically screams CHECK OUT THIS MOVIE REVIEW. Yippie.

Once inside a movie review the reviewer will drone incessantly about this, that, and the other.

The comments section also is filled with people who seem to loathe Harry, and continuely post this as though they have an ultra-hip-nerd sensibility about them. It forces posting time and again on their part.

Repressed sexuality? Oh goodness yes. From the writers to the commenters, the “blow a load” analogy is very true. I just can’t take a whole lot of “THIS MOVIE IS INCREDABLE” from people who obviously don’t have a base for reality.

Several years ago, I used to go to AICN about every day. Then the pop-ups started. This was early in the days of pop ups, mind you. I understand why sites use them, but it doesn’t mean I have to like them. This was also in the days before pop up blockers were readily available and no one thought about needing a firewall.

Anyhow, AICN had pop-ups on every freakin’ page. Even when you would click on a story and go back to the home page. Sometimes you’d get two or three per click.

I emailed the webmaster to complain and was basically told to go copulate with myself. If I didn’t like it, I should go somewhere else.

I did and have only visited the site once since (just a few months ago to read the story about a supposed film version of the Hyperion saga).

The webmaster could have just as easily explained the need for the pop-ups without being a dick.

Bad example, Adam, considering that LOTR is the franchise that Harry has been *closest *to during his tenure at AICN- multiple set visits, personal emails from Peter Jackson, et cetera. His exposure to the inner workings of the Star Wars and Matrix films has been limited to writing glowing reviews, and if you think that has somehow caused those films to suck, you have a very strange understanding of causality.

That being said, I don’t particularly care for AICN either… I read it on occasion, but usually am quickly scared off again by poor writing and oozing repressed sexuality that others have mentioned. And that’s just the reviews/ previews/ spy reports/ what have you themselves… one look at any Talkback is usually enough to cause me to flee in terror. That’s just my personal take on AICN, though, and only AICN. There’s plenty of geeky sites out there that don’t reek of juvenility like AICN- see CHUD.com for an excellent example of a movie geek site that actually features decent writers, insightful and witty reviews, and news that isn’t wrong 85% of the time.

Thanks Tarrsk!
CHUD.com on first browse looks like it kicks AICN’s ass into oblivion!

Ok first things first: You dont like AICN? DONT GO THERE! Problem solved!
I do like Harry despite the juvenile reviews and the fact that he gives almost anything a thumbs up. Harry and co. do a lot for small arty films that no one would know about otherwise, and the dude knows his stuff when he comes to film.
That said his reviews can get almost disturbing: Go hunt down his Blade 2 review-you will either shit your pants laughing, or hunt him down like a dog and try your damndest to kill him. My reaction was the former though! That and his Charlie’s Angels reviews are the funniest movie reviews ever.

I disagree. It looks like he was just taught HTML by a color blind monkey. I can’t go to that site and read anything, it’s too…horrible and busy. But beyond having really really really hideous ideas about layout and fonts, I can’t say I have an opinion about the guy. [sub] I’d have to be able to read his articles that[/sub]