Harry Turtledove, Kurt Waldheim, and the Nazis

I’ve been a fan of Harry Turtledove’s alternate history novels for some time, and I recently picked up a copy of his latest, “In The Face of Mine Enemies”. In this book, Turtledove introduces a world where America stayed out of WWII, leaving Germany to eventually become the dominant global superpower. As the book opens in the early months of 2010, we learn that the current Fuhrer is a 91-year-old WWII vet named “Kurt Haldweim”.

Though he faded from the public spotlight before I was born, I recognized this name as a play on that of Kurt Waldheim, former UN Secretary General. Upon checking an encyclopedia, the similarities became more apparent - Waldheim and Haldweim are the same age and have the same birthdate, both were German officers in WWII, and both had bloody reputations - whereas the real Waldheim was accused of war crimes in Yugoslavia a generation later, the fictitious Haldweim is renowned as an aggressive and zealous exterminator of Slavic Jews. It quickly became obvious that, in Turtledove’s work, Waldheim = Haldweim, but for some reason he had chosen to transpose the two letters.

My question is this - why? I imagine that Mr. Waldheim might be a bit irked by being portrayed as the ruler of a cruel and oppressive militaristic empire, but could he really sue Turtledove over that portrayal? And does transposing two letters in the surname actually protect Turtledove from such a lawsuit? In other words, if I were to write a novel about a certain Irish Catholic senator from Massachusetts, whose brother was an assassinated president, and I portryed this senator as a bloodthirsty vampire, would it protect me from prosecution if I called him “Ted Denneky”?

Under American law, it would be extremely difficult. Public figures have to fight a very steep uphill battle.

Given how hard it would be for the real Waldheim to sue in the first place, I guess the letter thing doesn’t hurt. One part of libel suit in the U.S. is identification: if Waldheim wanted to prove Turtledove libeled him, he would first have to prove conclusively that the character was definitely him. The character is a guy in a work of fiction who did things Karl Waldheim clearly never did, so while it might be clear it’s based on him, I’m not sure that’s enough.

It would be almost impossible for him to sue you because Ted Kennedy is an extremely public figure. A very large burden of proof would be on him. If you proved it was parody, you’d be fine no matter what.